A R T I C L E S
Lin et al.
Scheme 2
chiral rodlike platinum complexes employing 2a and 2b as
building blocks.3d As compared with 2a and 2b, 1,8,9,16-
tetraethynyltetraphenylene (3) is more helical-like because the
introduction of ethynyl groups on C-1, C-8, C-9, and C-16
renders 3 an excellent candidate for constructing rigid helical
supermolecules.
knowledge, there have been no literature reports on macrocycles
that are assembled by enantiopure tetraphenylene derivatives.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of Enantiopure 1,8,9,16-Tetraethynyltetraphenylene
(3). Appropriate substituents on C-1, C-8, C-9, and C-16 on
tetraphenylene (1) endow 1 superior potential as a rigid building
block in the formation of helical macrocycles. Nonetheless, the
steric hindrance on these positions due to the molecular shape
also leads to the difficulty in realizing 3. Enantiopure 2a was
prepared by resolution through (S)-camphorsulfonylation.3d Due
to the defined absolute configuration of the (S)-camphorsulfonyl
group, enantiomerically pure (S,S)-2a and (R,R)-2a were
obtained after subsequent desulfonylation steps. With enan-
tiopure 2a in hand, enantiopure 3 was primarily obtained by
transition metal coupling reactions. Due to the steric hindrance
of the tetraphenylene scaffold, triflate 5 failed to react with
trimethylsilylacetylene under the conditions of Sonogashira9 and
Kumada reactions.10 In these attempts, starting material 5 was
recovered. We then switched our efforts to a Negishi reaction,11
since zinc reagents should be more reactive. Trimethylsilyl-
ethynyl zinc chloride did react with triflate 5 catalyzed by
Pd(dppp)Cl2 in diglyme at 100 °C. Without further purification,
trimethylsilyl groups were removed by K2CO3 in MeOH
(Scheme 2). After careful chromatography, 3 was separated in
a disappointing yield of only 7%, which was too low to fulfill
the next step for the synthesis of macrocycles. In this procedure,
products with two remaining triflic groups were also detected.
These results indicate that the Negishi reaction was by no means
efficient for the introduction of ethynyl groups to the sterically
compact tetraphenylene molecule.
Coordination-driven self-assembly of supramolecular scaf-
folds such as sticks, squares, helices, cylinders, and cages have
significantly grown over the past decade.6 Compared to co-
valently bonded organic counterparts, the preparation of
metal-organic supermolecules enjoys higher efficiency and ease
after elaborate designs. Herein, we wish to report an efficient
synthesis of 3 as well as the realization of a series of enantiopure
helical macrocycles containing the structural motif of 3. We
believe that such helical macrocycles possess attractive potential
applications as luminescent and nonlinear optical materials,
molecular wires, and molecular electronics, because of the
alkynyl group’s inherent property of linear geometry, structural
rigidity, π-electron delocalization, and ability to interact with
metal via pπ-dπ overlap.7 It is noteworthy that 3 can also
transfer its chirality to the macrocycle cores, which make the
macrocycles possess optical rotation values.8 To the best of our
(4) (a) Rajca, A.; Safronov, A.; Rajca, S.; Shoemaker, R. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 488–491. (b) Marsella, M. J.; Kim, I. T.; Tharn,
F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 974–975.
(5) Man, Y.-M.; Mak, T. C. W.; Wong, H. N. C. J. Org, Chem. 1990, 55,
3214–3221.
(6) For reviews, see: (a) Leininger, S.; Olenyuk, B.; Stang, P. J. Chem.
ReV. 2000, 100, 853–907. (b) Seidel, S. R.; Stang, P. J. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2002, 35, 972–983. (c) Swiegers, G. F.; Malefetse, T. J. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2002, 225, 91–121. (d) Holliday, B. J.; Mirkin, C. A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2022–2043. (e) Cotton, F. A.; Lin,
C.; Murillo, C. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 759–771. (f) Fujita, M.
Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 417–425. (g) Lee, S. J.; Lin, W. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2008, 41, 521–537. (h) Schwab, P. F. H.; Levin, M. D.; Michl,
J. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1863–1934. (i) Fujita, M.; Tominaga, M.;
Hori, A.; Therrien, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 369–378. (j) Ward,
M. D. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4487–4499.
We therefore directed our attention to the use of cyano groups
instead of a trimethylsilylethynyl group, as the former has a
(8) (a) Katz, T. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1921–1923. (b) Graule,
S.; Rudolph, M.; Vanthuyne, N.; Autschbach, J.; Roussel, C.; Crassous,
J.; Re´au, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3183–3185.
(9) (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tohda, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975,
16, 4467–4470. For review, see: (b) Hegedus, L. S. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1993, 457, 167–272. (c) Alami, M.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6109–6112.
(7) (a) Ziessel, R.; Hissler, M.; Elghayoury, A.; Harriman, A. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 1998, 178-180, 1251–1298. (b) Khan, M. S.; Kakkar,
A. K.; Long, N. J.; Lewis, J.; Raithby, P. R.; Marder, T. B.; Wittmann,
F.; Friend, R. H. J. Mater. Chem. 1994, 4, 1227–1232. (c) Yam, V. W.-
W.; Yu, K.-L.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Cheung, K.-K. Organometallics 2001,
20, 721–726. (d) Yam, V. W.-W. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 555–
563. (e) Yam, V. W.-W.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Zhu, N. Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 6506–6507. (f) Yam, V. W.-W.; Wong, K. M.-C.;
Zhu, N. Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1400–1403. (g) Yam,
V. W.-W.; Chan, K. H.-Y.; Wong, K. M.-C.; Chu, B. W.-K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6169–6173.
(10) Tamao, K.; Sumitani, K.; Kumada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
4374–4375.
(11) (a) King, A. O.; Okukado, N.; Negishi, E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1977, 683–684. (b) Negishi, E.; Okukado, N.; King, A. O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2254–2255.
9
16384 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 46, 2010