A.M.G. Silva et al. / Tetrahedron 66 (2010) 8544e8550
8549
0.22 mmol, 1.2 equiv), DCC (49.1 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.3 equiv), HOBt
(32.1 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1.3 equiv), 1-naphthylamine (26.2 mg,
0.18 mmol), and DMA (2 mL) was placed in a 10 mL reaction vial,
which was then closed under an argon atmosphere and placed in the
cavity of a CEM microwave reactor. The reaction vial was irradiated
at 55 ꢀC (1 min ramp to 55 ꢀC and 60 min hold at 55 ꢀC, using 100 W
maximum power). The reaction mixture was then purified by flash
chromatography using a 95:5 mixture of chloroform/methanol as
eluent to give 4 (22.6 mg, 30% yield). [Found: C, 73.29; N, 6.84; H
6.30. C26H24N2O3$2/3H2O requires C, 73.57; N, 6.60; H 6.02%]; dH
(400 MHz; DMSO-d6) 2.31 (3H, s, CH3), 2.92 (2H, t, J 6.8 Hz,
CH2CH2CONH), 4.27 (2H, t, J 6.8 Hz, CH2CH2CONH), 5.03 (2H, s,
CH2C6H5), 6.17 (1H, d, J 7.6 Hz, 5-H), 7.29e7.38 and 7.41e7.44 (5H,
2m, CH2C6H5), 7.47e5.56 (3H, m, naph-H), 7.62 (1H, d, J 7.2 Hz, naph-
H), 7.63 (1H, d, J 7.6 Hz, 6-H), 7.77 (1H, d, J 8.0 Hz, naph-H), 7.91e7.95
(2H, m, naph-H), 10.08 (1H, s, NH). dC (100 MHz; DMSO-d6) 12.0
(CH3), 36.6 (CH2CH2CONH), 49.3 (CH2CH2CONH), 71.9 (CH2C6H5),
116.2 (C-5), 121.9, 122.7, 125.5, 125.6, 125.9, 126.1, 127.7, 127.8, 128.2,
128.28, 128.34, 133.2, 133.7, 137.9, 139.7 (C-6), 140.7 (C-2), 145.5 (C-
3), 168.8 (CH2CH2CONH), 171.0 (C-4). m/z (MS, FAB) 413 [MþH]þ.
amount of the ligands solution in water (% DMSO less than 1%)
and with ionic strength 0.1 M in NaCl. Spectrophotometric pH
titrations were performed in stock aqueous solutions of the
ligands (w2.5ꢂ10ꢃ5 M), and aliquots of strong acid or base were
added to adjust pH to the desired value. Calculations were
performed with the program PHAB using data sets of at least
three independent experiments. A typical experiment includes
more than 10 solutions in which 10 different pH values have
been fixed.
4.8. Fluorescence spectroscopy
Steady-state fluorescence measurements were carried out in
a Varian spectrofluorometer, model Cary Eclipse, equipped with
a constant-temperature cell holder (Peltier single cell holder).
Stock solutions of the compounds were obtained by dissolution in
DMSO. All solutions were prepared by dilution of the right amount
of the compound solution in the solvent (% DMSO less than 1%). All
spectra were recorded with a lexc¼290 nm and emission between
300 and 550 nm for the ligands L1 and L2 and lexc¼325 nm and
emission between 350 and 550 nm for the naphthylamine. The slit
width values used for excitation and emission were 10 nm for L1
and L2 in DMSO and 5 nm for L1 and L2 in ACN. Fluorescence
quenching studies were achieved by successive addition of a con-
4.6. Synthesis of 1-(N-naphthylcarbamoylpropyl)-3-hydroxy-
2-methyl-4-pyridinone hydrochloride (L2)
A mixture of 4 (0.30 g, 0.73 mmol) and a catalytic amount of 10%
Pd/C (w/w) in ethanol (10 mL) and HCl (0.05 mL) was stirred under
a hydrogen atmosphere at room temperature for 5 h. The reaction
mixture was filtered through Celite and the solvent evaporated in
vacuum to give the crude product. The resulting residue was
crystallized in methanol/acetone to give the hydrochloride salt of
L2 (0.17 g, 65%) as a white powder. Dihydroxypyridinium form mp
224e226 ꢀC. [Found: C, 63.35; N, 7.87; H, 5.14. C19H18N2O3$HCl
requires C 63.60, N 7.81, H 5.34%]; dH (400 MHz; DMSO-d6) 2.65 (3H,
s, CH3), 3.16 (2H, t, J 6.7 Hz, CH2CH2CONH), 4.72 (2H, t, J 6.7 Hz,
CH2CH2CONH), 7.34 (1H, d, J 7.0 Hz, 5-H), 7.47e7.55 (3H, m, naph-
H), 7.60 (1H, d, J 7.2 Hz, naph-H), 7.77 (1H, d, J 8.2 Hz, naph-H),
7.86e7.94 (2H, m, naph-H), 8.28 (1H, d, J 7.0 Hz, 6-H), 9.57e11.42
(2H, br, OH), 10.25 (1H, s, NH). dC (100 MHz; DMSO-d6) 14.0 (CH3),
37.2 (CH2CH2CONH), 53.9 (CH2CH2CONH), 112.0 (C-5), 123.3, 124.0,
126.87, 126.93, 127.2, 127.4, 129.1, 129.5, 134.4, 135.0, 140.0 (C-6),
143.0 (C-2), 144.4 (C-3), 160.3 (C-4), 169.7 (CH2CH2CONH). m/z (MS,
FAB) 323 [MþH]þ.
stant volume (10 ml) of nitrate metal solutions to the cuvette (final
concentration range 0.0e1ꢂ10ꢃ5 M) containing a constant amount
of ligand (w10ꢃ6 M).
4.9. X-ray crystallography
Crystals of L1 and L2 with suitable quality for single crystal
X-ray determination were grown up from chloroform/methanol
solution.
Crystal data of L1: C16H14NO2Cl, M¼287.73, orthorhombic, space
group Pbcn, Z¼8, a¼8.7433(2), b¼13.1065(4), c¼24.0925(7) Å,
V¼2760.86(13) Å3,
r
(calcd)¼1.384 Mg mꢃ3
,
m
¼0.277 mmꢃ1. 25,774
reflections were collected and subsequently merged to 3372 unique
reflections with a Rint of 0.0509. The final refinement of 190 pa-
rameters converged to final R and Rw indices R1¼0.0516 and
wR2¼0.1006 for 2374 reflections with I>2
s
(I) and R1¼0.0870, and
wR2¼0.1116 for all hkl data.
Crystal data of L2: C19H19N2O3Cl, M¼358.81, monoclinic,
space group P21, Z¼2, a¼8.2793(5), b¼7.1661(5), c¼14.3206(9) Å,
The hydrochloride salt of L2 (100 mg; 0.28 mmol) was dissolved
in a (10:1) mixture of chloroform/methanol and washed twice with
a saturated aqueous solution of Na2CO3. Then the organic layer was
extracted with chloroform and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The
solvent was evaporated in vacuum and the resulting residue was
crystallized in chloroform/hexane to give quantitatively L2 in keto
form. Keto form mp 198e200 ꢀC dH (400 MHz; DMSO-d6) 2.41 (3H, s,
CH3), 3.99 (2H, t, J 6.8 Hz, CH2CH2CONH), 4.35 (2H, t, J 6.8 Hz,
CH2CH2CONH), 6.23 (1H, d, J 7.2 Hz, 5-H), 7.47e7.56 (3H, m, naph-
H), 7.60 (1H, d, J 7.2 Hz, naph-H), 7.65 (1H, d, J 7.2 Hz, 6-H), 7.77 (1H,
d, J 8.4 Hz, naph-H), 7.89e7.94 (2H, m, naph-H), 10.18 (1H, s, NH). dC
(100 MHz; DMSO-d6) 11.5 (CH3), 36.6 (CH2CH2CONH), 49.5
(CH2CH2CONH), 110.6 (C-5), 121.9, 122.8, 125.5, 125.8, 126.0, 127.7,
128.0, 133.1, 133.6, 137.9 (C-6), 145.3 (C-3), 168.8 (C-4 and
CH2CH2CONH).
V¼846.69(9) Å3,
b
¼94.782 (4)ꢀ,
r
(calcd)¼1.407 Mg mꢃ3
,
m
¼0.247 mmꢃ1.10,581 reflections were collected, and subsequently
merged to 4335 unique reflections with a Rint of 0.0264. The final
refinement of 237 parameters converged to final R and Rw indices
R1¼0.0535 and wR2¼0.1331 for 3943 reflections with I>2
s(I) and
R1¼0.0601, and wR2¼0.1383 for all hkl data.
The X-ray data were collected on a CCD Bruker APEX II at 150(2)
K using graphite monochromatized Mo K
a
radiation (l¼0.71073 Å).
The crystals of L1 and L2 were positioned at 35 mm from the CCD
and the spots were measured using a counting time of 60 s. Data
reduction including a multi-scan absorption correction were car-
ried out using the SAINT-NT from Bruker AXS. The structures were
solved by direct methods using SHELXS-97.17 and refined through
full-matrix least squares with SHELXL-97.18 Anisotropic thermal
parameters were used for all non-hydrogen atoms. The CeH
hydrogen atoms were introduced in the refinement at calculated
positions giving thermal parameters equivalent 1.2 times those of
the atom to which were attached. The NeH and OeH hydrogen
positions in L1 and L2 were found from the last Fourier maps and
they were included in the structure refinement with individual
isotropic temperature factors. Molecular diagrams were drawn
with PLATON.19 CCDC 753940 for L1, CCDC 753939 for L2 and CCDC
753941 for derivative 4 contain the supplementary crystallographic
4.7. Spectrophotometric determination of acidity constants
Electronic absorption spectra were recorded with a Varian
Cary bio50 spectrophotometer, equipped with a Varian Cary
single cell Peltier accessory, using quartz cells with 1 cm path
length, thermo stated at 25 ꢀC. Stock solutions of the ligands
were prepared by dissolution in DMSO. Acidity constants of both
ligands were obtained in aqueous solution by dilution of the right