Under Marson-type FC conditions, initial efforts to cyclize
4 to the benzotetrahydrofuran 8 with BF3·Et2O were met with
limited success.7b,c,13 After screening, a large excess of SnCl4
was found to give optimal results at -78 °C.6a,d Notably,
this intramolecular arylation step proceeded with high stereo-
and regioselectivity at C9/C10. The alternative C7/C10-
regioisomer and C8/C10 ipso-isomer were not detected.
Quenching the reaction was, however, problematic. Typical
aqueous protocols led to significant decomposition of 8, with
significant reversion back to 4. After considerable experi-
mentation, quenching the remaining SnCl4 by pouring into
half-saturated Rochelle salt solution suppressed these side-
reactions and reliably provided 8 in good yields.14 As much
as 8 equivalents of SnCl4 were, however, required for the
conversion, suggesting a possible retardation of Lewis acid
reactivity by the sulfonate group.15
To further improve practical issues, we next decided to
develop a direct catalytic FC method to 8. Having screened
several oxophilic Lewis acids, a new catalytic combination of
5 mol % Bi(OTf)3 with 3 equiv of LiClO4 as a cocatalyst16
was eventually discovered to drive the FC cyclization to furnish
8 in 94% yield within 3.5 h.15 Interestingly, LiClO4 alone was
incapable of effecting the cyclization and one equivalent of
Bi(OTf)3 without LiClO4 gave inefficient conversions for
tosylates. In Mukaiyama’s SbCl5/LiClO4-catalyzed Friedel-
Crafts acylation,16a the formation of an active oxocarbenium
perchlorate species is suggested between SbCl5 and LiClO4 with
acid anhydrides.15 Likewise, the combination of Bi(OTf)3 and
LiClO4 could generate a more reactive cationic species with
the lactol 4 toward nucleophilic ring closure. From our findings,
we also reason that Li+ can compete for the Lewis basic
sulfonate group and release any trapped Bi(III), thereby allowing
a catalytic cycle to persist.
(at ambient pressures) or THF (in a sealed-tube) at 130 °C
efficiently afforded the dienone caged-core 10 in 86% yield
over two steps.
As introduced earlier, a chemo- and stereocontrolled
conjugate reduction at the electron-deficient C4-C9 olefin
of 10 to the enone 3a (versus its C9-epimer 3b) was
anticipated to be achievable by virtue of the C6-methoxy
group. A method to control the stereochemical outcome was,
however, difficult to achieve (Table 1, entries 1-3). Atmo-
Table 1. Conjugate Reduction Study of R-Methoxydienone 10
entry
1
conditions
yield (%) 3a:3ba
Pd-C cat., H2, EtOAc/ethanolic
KOH (2:1), 2 h
70
56
1:3b
2
(i) CuCl/NaOtBu/(R)-tol-BINAP (20 mol %),
PMHSc (2 equiv), toluene, 132 h; then
(ii) DMPd (3 equiv), CH2Cl2, 7 h
(S)-BINAP/Cu(OAc)2 (0.5 equiv),
1:4
3
4
5
6
17
30
10
61
0:1
PMHSc (6 equiv), BuOH/THF, 36 h
t
(-)-13 (1 equiv), 15 (2.4 equiv),
3.5:1
1.2:1
8:1e
dioxane, 60 °C, 48 h
20 mol % (S)-TRIP23/ D-Val-OtBu,
15 (5 equiv), nBu2O, 70 °C, 120 h
20 mol % (-)-14, 15 (3.2 equiv),
dioxane, 60 °C, 130 h
a Based on 1H NMR dr at C9. b 11a/11b isolated (1:3). c Polymethylhydro-
siloxane. d Dess-Martin periodinane. e 11a/11b also isolated in 17% yield
(∼1:1).
spheric hydrogenation of 10 over catalytic Pd/C afforded a
1:3 diastereomeric ratio (dr) in favor of undesired 11b over
11a (entry 1). Buchwald’s in situ prepared (R)-p-tol-BINAP-
stabilized Cu-H complex17 gave a 1:4 dr in favor of 3b
over 3a (entry 2) and alternative Cu-H conditions with (S)-
BINAP18 favored the undesired 3b exclusively (entry 3).
Having secured reliable FC cyclization conditions, the
benzyl deprotected tosyl-phenol 9 was freshly formed (see
Supporting Information for single-crystal X-ray data) and
directly subjected to intramolecular alkylative dearomatiza-
tion conditions. Boger’s methods were initially examined.8b,c
DBU in refluxing CH3CN or NaH in DMF/THF (and
Collectively, these results suggest an over-riding substrate-
controlled steric effect enforcing ꢀ-facial attack. They are
also consistent with Mulzer’s first investigation on using
Crabtree’s Ir-catalyst, which furnished a 1.3:1 C8/C9-cis/
trans decalin mixture at best from a C6-demethoxy analog
of 10 under 1 atm of H2.4a Nevertheless, exceptions to
substrate control have been achieved under high pressures
and with optimized chiral reagents. These include Corey’s
600-psi Rh(I)/DIOP-catalyzed hydrogenation3b and, recently,
Mulzer and Pfaltz optimized their Ir(I)/P,N-ligand-catalyzed
hydrogenation5g procedure at 50 bar of pressure. Neither
possessing the specialized apparatus nor reagents, we pursued
alternative methods to affect a stereocontrolled reduction
process (Table 1, entries 4-6).
Inspired by amine-based organocatalytic mechanistic
rationales, we explored the possibility of reversing the facial
preference of 10 toward hydride delivery by relaying steric
information via a C6-methoxy group-directed putative trans-
iminium species 16 (Figure 1). Although MacMillan-type
catalysts in the presence of Hantzsch hydride donors like
t
methods such as Na in BuOH or LDA in THF) gave poor
conversions with 9. Eventually, without the need to resort
to better leaving groups or phenyl silyl ether activation
methods,3b,5e,8b,d the treatment of 9 with TBAF in xylene
(11) Evans, D. A.; Bender, S. L.; Morris, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988,
110, 2506
.
(12) Martinelli, M. J.; Nayyar, N. K.; Moher, E. D.; Dhokte, U. P.;
Pawlak, J. M.; Vaidyanathan, R. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 447
.
(13) (a) TfOH and TMSOTf were also unsuccessful. Other BF3·Et2O-
mediated electrophilic arylations: (b) Sugai, T.; Kakeya, H.; Ohta, H.
Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 3463. (c) Kim, H.; Wooten, C. M.; Park, Y.; Hong,
J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3965
.
(14) Examples of using Rochelle salts in work-up procedures in titanium-
and aluminum-mediated reactions: Jung, M. E.; D’Amico, D. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12150.
(15) A bromo-equivalent of the tosylate 4 could be cyclized with only
4 equivalents of SnCl4 or 5 mol % of Bi(OTf)3 in 1.5 h during FC screening
studies. This work will be described in full together with the conjugate
reduction study of 10 and a complete total synthesis of (-)-1.
(16) (a) Mukaiyama, T.; Suzuki, K.; Han, J. S.; Kobayashi, S. Chem.
Lett. 1992, 435. (b) Kawada, A.; Mitamura, S.; Kobayashi, S. Chem.
Commun. 1996, 183. (c) Chapman, C. J.; Frost, C. G.; Hartley, J. P.; Whittle,
A. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 773. (d) Bartoli, G.; Locatelli, M.;
Melchiorre, P.; Sambri, L. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 2037.
(17) Moritani, Y.; Appella, D. H.; Jurkauskas, V.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6797.
(18) Rainka, M. P.; Aye, Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
2004, 101, 5821.
5512
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010