Despite the popularity of these transition metal catalyzed
reactions, the toxicity associated with these metals and the
inability to recover 100% of the spent reagent raises concerns
and obstructs their use in industrial processes. Attempts have
been made to recover osmium catalysts after oxidation by
immobilization12 or microencapsulation13 of the catalysts on
polymers. In keeping with green trends in organic synthesis,
Ochiai et al. introduced environmentally benign organoiodine
reagents14 [PhIO, 48%HBF4, 18-Crown-614a and ArI (cat),
48% HBF4, mCPBA14b] for the oxidative cleavage of
alkenes. More recently, Nicolaou reported a one-pot com-
bination of hydroxylation (Upjohn conditions15) followed by
the addition of stoichiometric Ph(IOAc)2 to effect alkene
cleavage.16 Continuing our interest in developing catalytic
and selective oxidation protocols using water-soluble hy-
pervalent iodine reagents in presence of Oxone as a co-
oxidant,17 we reasoned that the oxidation of 4-iodobenzoic
acid (4-IBAcid, 1) with Oxone would yield [hydroxy(4-
carboxyphenyl)-iodonium]ion, 2, a structural derivative of
the active reagent reported by Ochiai et al. for alkene
functionalization (Scheme 1).14a Herein, we report a facile
protonation of iodosyl benzene) is known to be readily soluble
in H2O at pH <2.3.18 Thus, it is not surprising that in the acidic
oxidation medium, 2 is more soluble in solvent mixtures with
higher concentration of D2O. Having established that 2 can
readily be formed from the oxidation of 1 we set out to
investigate the utility of 2 as an in situ generated reagent for
oxidative cleavage of alkenes. Commerically available 1-phenyl-
1- cyclohexene 3 was chosen as the test substrate upon which
optimization studies were performed.
In this study, we chose to focus our initial attention on
determining whether Oxone alone promoted alkene cleavage.
Entries 1 and 2 of Table 1 demonstrate that while Oxone
Table 1. Optimization Studies with 1-Phenyl-1-Cyclohexene, 3a
equiv
% yieldb
entry
1
oxone
(4 + 5)
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
-
0.5c
1.0c
0.5
0.75
1.0
1.2
1.5
1.63
2.0
2.0
95
100
95
69
45
25
8d
3d
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
24
40
65
92
92
100
100
100
100
Scheme 1. Oxidation of 4-IBAcid by Oxone
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.25
0.05
7
15
10
-
5
-
-
-
-
9
and operationally convenient protocol for the oxidative
cleavage of alkenes and vicinal diols in aqueous acetonitrile
using catalytic amounts of 4-IBAcid in the presence of Oxone
as a terminal oxidant.
10
11
12
-
-
-
2.0
2.0
a Reactions were carried out on 0.2 g scale in H2O:CH3CN (1:1 v/v, 20
mL) at 60 °C for 3 h. b 1H NMR yield. c No 4-IBAcid present. d Exclusively
5 with no 4 present.
Our initial efforts were directed at establishing the easy
oxidation of 1 with Oxone in aqueous acetonitrile to produce
the corresponding iodonium ion, 2, the desired active reagent.
Treatment of 1 with 0.75 equiv of Oxone in D2O/CD3CN (3:1
v/v) readily provided 2. However, we also noted that the
oxidation of 1 carried out in 2:1 and 1:1 v/v D2O and CD3CN
were incomplete as evident from the presence of the deshielded
AA′BB′ signals due to 2 along with the upfield signals of 1 in
does convert alkene 3 to the diol products19 4 and 5, no
oxidative cleavage is observed. However, in the presence of
4-IBAcid, alkene 3 is cleaved to the corresponding oxidized
products 6 and 7. The yield of keto-aldehyde 6 and keto-
acid 7 is dependent on the ratio of 4-IBAcid to Oxone.
Entries 3-9 demonstrate that in the presence of 1.0 equiv
of 1, varying equivalents of Oxone results in changes in
product distribution; an increase in Oxone concentration is
met with a parallel increase in formation of cleaved products
6 and 7. The yield of 6 is never high due to rapid aldehyde
oxidation to 7 by Oxone.20 We identified that 1.5-2.0 equiv
of Oxone proved sufficient for complete conversion of 3 (a
trisubstituted alkene) to 7 (a keto-acid).21 The isolated
product mixture from this optimization study contained small
(<20%) amounts of 1 (see Supporting Information) indicating
1
the corresponding H NMR spectra. The apparent difference
in the extent of oxidation in the three solvent mixtures may be
a reflection of the solubility differences of 1 and 2 in the
respective media. [Hydroxy(phenyl)iodonium] ion (obtained by
(12) Kobayashi, S.; Endo, M.; Eagayama, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 11229.
(13) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Endo, M.; Nagayama, S. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
63, 6094. (b) Ho, C. -M.; Yu, W. -Y.; Che, C. -M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed
2004, 43, 3303.
(14) (a) Miyamoto, K.; Tada, N.; Ochiai, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 2772. (b) Miyamoto, K.; Sei, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ochiai, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1382.
(15) Van Rheeven, V.; Kelley, R. C.; Cha, D. Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976,
23, 1973.
(18) Richter, H. W.; Cherry, B. R.; Zook, T. D.; Koser, G. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9614.
(16) Nicolaou, K. C.; Adsool, V. A.; Hale, C. R. H. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 1552.
(19) Doan, L.; Bradley, K.; Gerdes, S.; Whalen, D. L. J. Org. Chem.
1999, 64, 6227.
(17) (a) Thottumkara, A. P.; Bowsher, M. S.; Vinod, T. K. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 2933. (b) Ohja, L. R.; Kudugunti, S.; Maddukuri, P. P.;
Kommareddy, A.; Gunna, M. R.; Dokuparthi, P.; Gottam, H. B.; Botha,
K. K.; Parapati, D. R.; Vinod, T. K. SynLett 2009, 1, 117.
(20) (a) Travis, B. R.; Sivakumar, M.; Hollist, G. O.; Borhan, B. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 1031. (b) Gandhari, R.; Maddukuri, P. P.; Vinod, T. K.
J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 852.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5641