As shown in Scheme 1, the synthesis of GNB, LNB, and
their derivatives was carried out using a one-pot two-enzyme
system containing BiGalHexNAcP and a recombinant E. coli
GalK. GalK catalyzed the formation of a-D-Gal-1-P from
inexpensive D-Gal in the presence of ATP. The in situ generated
a-D-Gal-1-P was used as the donor substrate by the
phosphorylase to form diverse b1–3-linked galactosides.
Excess amounts of D-Gal and ATP (1.2 or 1.5 equiv.) were
used to drive the reaction towards disaccharide formation.
HPLC-based pH profile study of BiGalHexNAcP revealed
that its catalytic activity was optimum in a relatively narrow
pH range of 5.0 to 6.5. Extremely low activity was observed
when the pH of the reaction reached 7.0 or higher (see ESIw).
For GalK, it prefered a pH higher than 7.0 for optimum
activity, showed medium activity at pH 6.5 and low activity at
pH lower than 6.5. Therefore, pH 6.5 was chosen for the
one-pot two-enzyme reactions. The reactions were carried out at
37 1C for 48 h. Products were purified using the combination of
size exclusion chromatography and silica gel chromatography.
As shown in Table 1, BiGalHexNAcP exhibits promiscuous
acceptor substrate specificity and has comparable levels of
activity toward GlcNAc and GalNAc-based structures. For
example, free GlcNAc (1) and GalNAc (11), their b-glycosides
(2 and 12, respectively) and a-glycosides (3 and 13, respectively)
are superb acceptors for BiGalHexNAcP to produce LNB
(21–23) and GNB (31–33) disaccharides in excellent 92–96%
yields. Apparently, the configurations of the C-4 hydroxyl
group and the anomeric center of the N-acetyl hexosamine do
not affect the activity of BiGalHexNAcP.
and Galb1–3GalNAca1-O-Thr. As shown in Scheme 2,
incubating GalNAca1-O-Ser 41 or GalNAca1-O-Thr 42 with
Gal and ATP in the presence of GalK and BiGalHexNAcP
successfully produced the desired disaccharide products 43
and 44 in excellent 92% and 91% yields, respectively.
In summary, taking advantage of the acceptor substrate
promiscuity of BiGalHexNAcP, we have developed a highly
efficient one-pot two-enzyme approach for the synthesis of
diverse b1–3-linked galactosides. Compared to galactosyl-
transferase-catalyzed approaches, the BiGalHexNAcP-catalyzed
reactions do not require the use, in situ generation, or regeneration
of expensive sugar nucleotides, and thus are more efficient and
simplified systems for producing galactosides. We believe that
this synthetic route will contribute greatly to obtaining and
elucidating the important roles of b1–3-galactosides as well as
b1–3-galactoside-containing glycans and glycoconjugates.
This work was supported by NIH grants R01GM076360,
U01CA128442 (to X. Chen), and R01HD061935 (to P. G.
Wang). X. Chen is an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow, a
Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar, and a UC-Davis Chancellor’s
Fellow. We thank Professor David Mills at the University
of California-Davis for providing us the genomic DNA of
Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697.
Notes and references
1 Essentials of Glycobiology, ed. A. Varki, R. D. Cummings,
J. D. Esko, H. H. Freeze, P. Stanley, C. R. Bertozzi, G. W. Hart
and M. E. Etzler, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,
New York, 2nd edn, 2008.
Similarly, N-acetyl group derivatization with small acyl
groups or derivatives does not affect the BiGalHexNAcP
activity significantly. For example, GlcNTFA 4 and GalNTFA
14 with an N-trifluoroacetyl group or GlcNAcN3 5 and
GalNAcN3 15 with an N-azidoacetyl group in the hexosamines
are excellent acceptors to produce disaccharides 24–25 and
34–35 in 91–94% yields. However, larger N-acyl groups
differentiated glucosamine and galactosamine-based acceptors.
For example, GlcNPr 6 and GlcNBu 7 with an N-propyl and
an N-butyl group, respectively, at glucosamine, are good
acceptors for BiGalHexNAcP to synthesize disaccharides 26
and 27 in 86% and 78% yields, respectively. The synthetic
yield decreases moderately as the size of the N-acyl group on
the glucosamine increases. In contrast, the corresponding
galactosamine derivative GalNPr 16 leads to disaccharide 36
in a moderate 69% yield while GalNBu 17 is not a suitable
acceptor for BiGalHexNAcP. A bulky N-benzoyl group prevents
both glucosamine and galactosamine derivatives (8 and 18) from
being suitable BiGalHexNAcP acceptors. Quite interestingly,
GlcN3 9 and GalN3 19, the C2 derivatives of GlcNAc and
GalNAc with the N-acetyl group being replaced by a relatively
small azido group (–N3), are not tolerable acceptors.
2 (a) C. Kunz, S. Rudloff, W. Baier, N. Klein and S. Strobel, Annu.
Rev. Nutr., 2000, 20, 699–722; (b) J. Holgersson and J. Lofling,
Glycobiology, 2006, 16, 584–593; (c) T. Feizi, Immunol. Rev., 2000,
173, 79–88; (d) C. R. Bertozzi and L. L. Kiessling, Science, 2001,
291, 2357–2364.
3 M. Wilstermann and G. Magnusson, Carbohydr. Res., 1995, 272, 1–7.
4 (a) L. Hedbys, E. Johansson, K. Mosbach and P. O. Larsson,
Carbohydr. Res., 1989, 186, 217–223; (b) A. Vetere, M. Miletich,
M. Bosco and S. Paoletti, Eur. J. Biochem., 2000, 267, 942–949;
(c) A. D’Almeida, M. Ionata, V. Tran, C. Tellier, M. Dion and
C. Rabiller, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2009, 20, 1243–1246.
5 (a) G. Baisch, R. Ohrlein, M. Streiff and F. Kolbinger, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 751–754; (b) D. M. Su, H. Eguchi,
W. Yi, L. Li, P. G. Wang and C. Xia, Org. Lett., 2008, 10,
1009–1012; (c) Z. Wang, M. Gilbert, H. Eguchi, H. Yu,
J. Cheng, S. Muthana, L. Zhou, P. G. Wang, X. Chen and
X. Huang, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 1717–1728.
6 B. L. Cantarel, P. M. Coutinho, C. Rancurel, T. Bernard, V. Lombard
and B. Henrissat, Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37, D233–D238.
7 D. Derensy-Dron, F. Krzewinski, C. Brassart and S. Bouquelet,
Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 1999, 29(Pt 1), 3–10.
8 E. Farkas, J. Thiem, F. Krzewinski and S. Bouquelet, Synlett,
2000, 728–730.
9 (a) M. Kitaoka, J. Tian and M. Nishimoto, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 2005, 71, 3158–3162; (b) J. Xiao, S. Takahashi,
M. Nishimoto, T. Odamaki, T. Yaeshima, K. Iwatsuki and
M. Kitaoka, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2010, 76, 54–59.
10 (a) M. Nishimoto and M. Kitaoka, Biosci., Biotechnol., Biochem.,
2007, 71, 2101–2104; (b) M. Nishimoto and M. Kitaoka,
Carbohydr. Res., 2009, 344, 2573–2576.
BiGalHexNAcP also shows good tolerance towards
C6-modification. Both 6-deoxy-GlcNAc (GlcNAc6Deoxy) 10
and 6-azido-6-deoxy-GlcNAc (GlcNAc6N3) 20 are very good
acceptors for the enzyme to synthesize disaccharides 30 and 40
in high yields (84 and 87%, respectively).
11 M. Hidaka, M. Nishimoto, M. Kitaoka, T. Wakagi, H. Shoun and
S. Fushinobu, J. Biol. Chem., 2009, 284, 7273–7283.
12 X. Chen, J. Fang, J. Zhang, Z. Liu, J. Shao, P. Kowal, P. Andreana
and P. G. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 2081–2082.
13 D. A. Sela, J. Chapman, A. Adeuya, J. H. Kim, F. Chen,
T. R. Whitehead, A. Lapidus, D. S. Rokhsar, C. B. Lebrilla,
J. B. German, N. P. Price, P. M. Richardson and D. A. Mills,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2008, 105, 18964–18969.
The BiGalHexNAcP and the one-pot two-enzyme system
have also been successfully applied in the efficient synthesis of
biologically important T-antigens Galb1–3GalNAca1-O-Ser
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7507–7509 7509