C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
In conclusion, we present the first demonstration of regulating
chloride concentrations by photoisomerization of a receptor.
Isomerization alters the effective chain length, and thus the helical
stability of the aryl-triazole foldamer. The trans-dominated isomers
are more preorganized for chloride binding, and an ∼10-fold
reduction in binding affinity was induced by the trans-to-cis
isomerization in CH3CN. A robust chloride binding and release
cycle can be achieved by alternately irradiating the sample with
UV and visible light.
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by the Chemical
Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic
Energy Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy
and the Camille Dreyfus Teacher-Scholar Award. We thank Mario
Vieweger for assistance with the photoexcitation apparatus.
Figure 5. Light-driven cycles of the solution conductivity obtained upon
exposure to UV (purple) and visible (blue) light. The electrolyte solution
contains equimolar concentrations of TBACl and receptor 1 (1 mM, CH3CN,
298 K). The first point is the addition of 1trans-trans, and the dashed line
corresponds to the conductivity in the absence of receptor.
Supporting Information Available: General methods, compound
syntheses, molecular modeling, NMR data, UV-vis spectra of pho-
toisomerizations and TBACl titrations, NMR titrations, CD spectra,
diffusion NMR, and conductivity analysis. This material is available
by mixing the PSS-UV and PSS-vis solutions. The signals for the
triazole protons, two each for 1trans-trans and 1cis-cis and four for
1cis-trans, all shift the greatest degree compared to the other protons.
References
These large ∼1 ppm shifts are consistent with all the triazole CH
protons forming hydrogen bonds12,14,18 with the chloride inside
folded conformations of the three isomers. Based on the point at
which chloride-receptor saturation occurs (Figure 3, inset) and from
the approximate binding constants in CD2Cl2,17 the relative order
(1) Mayer, G.; Heckel, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4900–4921.
(2) Lehn, J.-M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 89–112.
(3) (a) Tsien, R. Y.; Zucker, R. S. Biophys. J. 1986, 50, 843–853. (b) Kaplan,
J. H.; Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1988, 85, 6571–
6575.
(4) Shinkai, S.; Nakaji, T.; Nishida, Y.; Ogawa, T.; Manabe, O. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 5860–5865.
(5) Shinkai, S.; Nakaji, T.; Ogawa, T.; Shigematsu, K.; Manabe, O. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 111–115.
(6) Haas, K. L.; Franz, K. J. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 4921–4960.
(7) Verkman, A. S.; Galietta, L. J. V. Nat. ReV. 2009, 8, 153–171.
(8) Clark, J. F.; Clark, D. L. EnViron. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 3124–3127.
(9) (a) Bencini, A.; Bernardo, M. A.; Bianchi, A.; Ciampolini, M.; Fusi, V.;
Nardi, N.; Parola, A. J.; Pina, F.; Valtancoli, B. J. Chem. Soc., Perkins
Trans. 2 1998, 413–418. (b) Bencini, A.; Bianchi, A.; Giorgi, C.;
Romagnoli, E.; Lodeiro, C.; Saint-Maurice, A.; Pina, F.; Valtancoli, B.
Supramol. Chem. 2001, 13, 277–285.
(10) (a) Shimasaki, T.; Kato, S.-I.; Ideta, K.; Goto, K.; Shinmyozu, T. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 1073–1087. (b) Wang, Y.; Bie, F.; Jiang, H. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 3630–3633.
(11) Molecular Switches; Feringa, B. L., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2001.
(12) (a) Hecht, S.; Meudtner, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4926–
4930. (b) Juwarker, H.; Lenhardt, J. M.; Pham, D. M.; Craig, S. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3740–3743. (c) Li, Y.; Flood, A. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 12111–12122. (d) Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Han, Y.; Wang, F.;
Jiang, H. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 9424–9433.
in the chloride affinities is as predicted: 1trans-trans > 1cis-trans > 1cis-cis
.
The association constants for the two PSSs indicate that the
chloride levels can be regulated with light. To test this idea, a
conductivity experiment21 was performed (Figure 5) with equimolar
concentrations of 1 and TBACl (1 mM, CH3CN, 298 K). Based on
the binding constants, the concentration of free chloride will be
0.23 mM for the visible PSS and this will increase to 0.56 mM
upon exposure to UV light. These differences are sufficient for a
proof of principle demonstration.
According to eq 1,22 the solution phase electrical conductivity
(κ) is directly related to the concentration (C) and diffusion
coefficient (D) of all the charged species in solution; all other
symbols have their usual meaning.
(13) Other anion-binding foldamers: (a) Suk, J.-M.; Jeong, K.-S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 11868–11869. (b) Kim, U.-I.; Suk, J.-M.; Naidu, V. R.;
Jeong, K.-S. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 11406–11414. (c) Xu, Y.-X.; Wang,
G.-T.; Zhao, X.; Jiang, X.-K.; Li, Z.-T. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7267–
7273. (d) See also sectrons in Saraogi, I.; Hamilton, A. D. Chem. Soc.
ReV. 2009, 38, 1726–1743. (e) Juwarker, H.; Suk, J.-M.; Jeong, K.-S. Chem.
Soc. ReV. 2009, 38, 3316–3325.
κ ) (Fe/k T) ·
|z |2D C
j j
(1)
∑
B
i
In solution, three species are responsible for the conductivity:
TBA+, chloride, and the complex 1•Cl-. While the concentration
of TBA+ remains unchanged, altering the binding strength of the
receptor changes the relative fraction of the free and bound chloride.
Formation of the 1•Cl- complex results in a larger charge carrier
with a smaller diffusion coefficient.
In the absence of the receptor, the conductivity of the salt solution
is 158 µS cm-1. Upon addition of 1trans-trans, the conductivity
decreases, as expected, to 128 µS cm-1. Irradiating the sample with
UV light caused an increased conductivity (135 µS cm-1), which
is attributed to an increase in the chloride concentration. Irradiation
with visible light lowered the conductivity (130 µS cm-1) on
account of the recapture of the chloride by the trans-dominated
receptors. This cycle can be repeated over eight times (Figure 5).
Using eq 1 and estimates for the diffusion coefficients17 of 1•Cl-,
TBA+, and chloride, the relative change in conductivity is
dominated by the calculated change in free chloride levels.17
(14) (a) Li, Y.; Flood, A. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 2649–2652. (b)
Hua, Y.; Flood, A. H. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2010, 39, 1262–1271.
(15) (a) Foldamers: Structure, Properties and Applications, Hecht, S.; Huc, I.,
Eds.; Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007. (b) Stone, M. T.; Heemstra, J. M.;
Moore, J. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 11–20.
(16) (a) Khan, A.; Kaiser, C.; Hecht, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1878–
1881. (b) Khan, A.; Hecht, S. Chem.sEur. J. 2006, 12, 4764–4774. (c)
Furusho, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Maeda, T.; Ikeda, M.; Yashima, E. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 3174–3176.
(17) See Supporting Information.
(18) Lee, S.; Hua, Y.; Park, H.; Flood, A. H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2100–2102.
(19) (a) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599. (b) Tornøe, C. W.; Christensen, C.;
Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064.
(20) (a) Vander Griend, D. A.; Bediako, D. K.; DeVries, M. J.; DeJong, N. A.;
Heeringa, L. P. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 656–662. (b) Li, Y.; Vander Griend,
D. A.; Flood, A. H. Supramol. Chem. 2008, 21, 111–117.
(21) Conners, K. A. Binding Constants; John Wiley and Sons: New York, 1987.
(22) Bard, A. J.; Faulkner, L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and
Applications, 2nd ed.; Wiley: 2000.
JA105793C
9
12840 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 37, 2010