agents with novel mechanisms of action. Over the past few
years, we have developed a series of triazole nucleoside
analogs bearing aromatic moieties on the triazole nucleo-
base4-6 some of which exhibited antiviral and anticancer
activity involving novel modes of action.4-6 Of particular
interest are some N-aryltriazole nucleosides, which showed
potent anticancer activity against drug-resistant pancreatic
cancer.6a However, their synthesis via Cu-mediated N-
arylation was far from satisfactory, with narrow substrate
scope and low product yields,6 thus limiting further biological
evaluation and structure/activity relationship studies.
Pd-catalyzed C-N coupling7 is becoming a powerful
technique in the synthesis of various N-arylated nucleoside
analogs.8 However, no reports exist on Pd-catalyzed C-N
cross coupling with triazole nucleoside precursors. In marked
contrast to simpler aromatic systems, triazole nucleosides
are particularly challenging for Pd-catalyzed cross coupling
reactions due to the low reactivity of the triazole ring, the
multiple coordinating N- and O-atoms and the labile glyco-
sidic bond. Here, we report the synthesis of novel N-
aryltriazole acyclonucleosides via highly reactive Pd-
catalyzed C-N cross-coupling. The phosphor ligands, Synphos
and Xantphos, had a selective and effective impact on the
C-N coupling reactions with the bromotriazole nucleoside
substrates, giving the corresponding products with good to
excellent yields. In addition, some of the synthesized triazole
nucleosides showed potent anticancer activity against drug-
resistant pancreatic cancer, with potentially novel modes of
action.
In this study, we used both 5-bromotriazole acyclonucleo-
side 1 and its structural isomer, 3-bromotriazole nucleoside
29 as the substrates for Pd-catalyzed C-N coupling (Scheme
1). Under the classical condition of 10 mol % Pd(OAc)2, 12
mol % BINAP and 2 equiv of Cs2CO3 in toluene,10 we only
obtained the C-N coupling product with 1 (Table S1, entry
1, Supporting Information), but not with 2. We therefore first
focused our attention on the reaction with 1. After extensive
screening (Table S1, Supporting Information), we defined
the optimized condition as Pd2(dba)3 with the combination
of Synphos as the ligand, K2CO3 as the base and toluene as
the solvent. It is noteworthy that monocoordinating ligands
Scheme 1. Bromotriazole Nucleosides 1 and 2 Were Used As
Starting Materials for the C-N Coupling Reactions in This
Study
turned out to be inefficient in this reaction (Figure S1, Table
S1, entries 4-6, Supporting Information), in concordance
with previous report.11 Although C3-Tunephos yielded
considerable amount of the product 3a (Table S1, entry 2,
Supporting Information), it also led to the formation of
numerous byproduct. Therefore, Synphos emerged as the
most effective ligand in our conditions (Table S1, entry 8,
Supporting Information). Furthermore, the nature and the
strength of bases affected importantly the reaction. Potassium
carbonate was superior to all the other bases tested (Table
S1, entry 13, Supporting Information): strong bases such as
NaOtBu and LiHMDS resulted in substrate decomposition;
whereas weak bases such as Li2CO3 were also ineffective
and failed to promote the reaction, but did not result in
substrate decomposition. The choice of solvent was also
critical, and toluene appeared to be the best choice (Table
S1, entry 13, Supporting Information), whereas the polar
solvent DMF yielded no product, but rather substrate
decomposition. Finally, the catalyst precursors also had a
considerable impact, with Pd2(dba)3 proving to be the most
efficient (Table S1, entries 19-21, Supporting Information)
allowing a high yield even with a catalyst loading of 1 mol
% (Table S1, entries 22, Supporting Information).
We next explored the scope of arylamine substrates (Table
1). The reaction worked extremely well with electron-rich
arylamines, affording the corresponding products with excel-
lent yields (Table 1, entries 1-7). Arylamines with electron-
deficient substituents led to decreased yet very good yields
(Table 1, entries 9-10). The use of even sterically hindered
arylamines offered the products with good to excellent yields
(Table 1, entries 6-7), except for pyrenylamine which gave
considerably reduced yields (Table 1, entry 8) probably due
to the particularly large pyrenyl moiety which would create
steric hindrance during the N-arylation process. A support
for this hypothesis came from the crystal structure of 3f
(Figure 1). As we can see, the glycosidic moiety in 3f is in
such a position that the approach of an exceedingly larger
amine to the reaction center might create steric hindrance
and therefore impede the reaction.
(4) Xia, Y.; Qu, F. Q.; Peng, L. Mini-ReV. Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 806
.
(5) (a) Xia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wan, J. Q.; Wang, M. H.; Rocchi, P.; Qu, F. Q.;
Neyts, J.; Iovanna, J. L.; Peng, L. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 6083. (b) Wan,
J. Q.; Xia, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M. H.; Rocchi, P.; Yao, J. H.; Qu, F. Q.;
Neyts, J.; Iovanna, J. L.; Peng, L. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 1144. (c) Wang,
M. H.; Xia, Y.; Fan, Y. T.; Rocchi, P.; Qu, F. Q.; Iovanna, J. L.; Peng, L.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5979
.
(6) (a) Liu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Fan, Y. T.; Maggiani, A.; Rocchi, P.; Qu, F. Q.;
Iovanna, J. L.; Peng, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 2503. (b) Li,
W.; Fan, Y. T.; Xia, Y.; Rocchi, P.; Zhu, R. Z.; Qu, F. Q.; Neyts, J.; Iovanna,
J. L.; Peng, L. HelV. Chim. Acta 2009, 92, 1503
.
(7) (a) Surry, D.; Buchwald, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6338.
(b) Hartwig, F. Nature 2008, 455, 314.
(8) (a) Thomson, P. F.; Lagisetty, P.; Balzarini, J.; De Clercq, E.;
Lakshman, M. K. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1728. (b) Lagisetty, P.;
Russon, L. M.; Lakshman, M. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3660.
(c) Ngassa, F. N.; DeKorver, K. A.; Melistas, T. S.; Yeh, E. A.-H.;
Lakshman, M. K. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4613. (d) Lakshman, M. K. Curr.
Org. Synth. 2005, 2, 83, and references therein.
(9) Zhu, R. Z.; Qu, F. Q.; Que´le´ver, G.; Peng, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 2389.
(10) Chakraborti, D.; Colis, L.; Schneider, R.; Basu, A. K. Org. Lett.
2003, 5, 2861–2864.
(11) Lakshman, M. K.; Hilmer, M. J. Q.; Keeler, J. Q.; Dinh, Y. V.;
Ngassa, F. N.; Russon, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7779.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 24, 2010
5713