13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d ¼ 28.2, 28.8, 29.5, 30.5, 32.9, 34.2
(CH2), 128.8, 130.8, 133.9, 139.8 (Th) ppm. UV-visible (CHCl3):
lmax ¼ 443 nm, SEC (THF, polystyrene standard) Mn ¼ 6800 g
molꢂ1; polydispersity ¼ 1.29.
for 300 s. After this spin coating procedure, the sol–gel coatings
were left to age for two days at room temperature.
Techniques
1H, 13C{1H} NMR spectra were recorded at RT in CDCl3 (50 mg
mLꢂ1). All the chemical shifts and coupling constants are
reported in ppm and Hz, respectively. Average molecular weights
and molecular weight distributions of the different poly-
thiophenes were measured using size exclusion chromatography
(SEC) on a system equipped with a guard column and PLgel 500,
103, 104 columns (Polymer Laboratories) and a differential
refractive-index detector (Waters). The eluent used was THF at
a flow rate of 1 mL minꢂ1 at 30 ꢀC. Polystyrene standards
(Polymer Laboratories) ranging from 1400 to 1300 ꢁ 103 g molꢂ1
were used to calibrate the SEC. UV-Vis absorption spectra were
recorded from 300 to 600 nm. Matrix-assisted laser desorption
ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) mass spectra were
recorded using a spectrometer equipped with a nitrogen laser,
operating at 337 nm with a maximum output of 500 J mꢂ2
delivered to the sample in 4 ns pulses at 20 Hz repeating rate.
Time-of-flight mass analyses were performed in the reflection
mode at a resolution of about 10 000. All the samples were
analyzed using (DCTB) trans-2-[3-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-
prop-2-enylidene]malonitrile matrix that was prepared as 20 mg
mLꢂ1 solution in CHCl3. The matrix solution (1 mL) was applied
to a stainless steel target and air dried. Polymer samples were
dissolved in CH2Cl2 to obtain 1 mg mLꢂ1 solutions. 1 mL aliquots
of those solutions were applied onto the target area already
bearing the matrix crystals, and air dried. For the recording of
the single-stage MS spectra, the quadrupole (rf-only mode) was
set to pass ions from 500 to 10 000 Th, and all ions were trans-
mitted into the pusher region of the time-of-flight analyzer where
they were mass analyzed with a 1 s integration time. Trans-
mission Electron Microscopy (TEM) observations were carried
out at 100 kV (JEOL 1200 EXII). Samples for TEM measure-
ments were prepared by embedding the hybrid material in
AGAR 100 resin, followed by ultramicrotomy techniques and
deposition on copper grids. Scanning Electron Microscopy
(SEM) images were obtained with a Hitachi S2600N microscope.
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images were obtained in
ambient conditions with an ICON microscope (Veeco Instru-
ments Inc.) operating in tapping mode. Si cantilevers with
a resonance frequency in the 150–300 kHz range were used. The
images were displayed and analyzed with the WSxM software,19
with topography coded from dark to bright. Elemental analyses
were carried out by the ‘‘Service Central de Micro-Analyse du
CNRS, Vernaison, France’’. Thermogravimetric analyses were
carried out at 10 ꢀC minꢂ1 under N2 and using ca. 10 mg samples
in Pt pans.
Compound 9. 1H NMR (CDCl3): d ¼ 1.38 (m, 8H, CH2), 1.70
(m, 2H, CH2), 1.84 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.80 (m, 2H, CH2–Th), 3.40
3
(t, 2H, CH2–Br, JH–H ¼ 7 Hz), 7.02 (s, 1H, Th) ppm. 13C{1H}
NMR (CDCl3): d ¼ 28.4, 28.9, 29.5, 29.6, 30.5, 30.7, 33.0, 34.2
(CH2), 128.9, 130.7, 133.9, 140.0 (Th) ppm. UV-visible (CHCl3):
lmax ¼ 443 nm, SEC (THF, polystyrene standard) Mn ¼ 5100 g
molꢂ1; polydispersity ¼ 1.28.
Regioregular poly{3-[N-(1-methylimidazolium-3-yl)alkyl]-
thiophene-2,5-diyl bromide} (10–12, respectively n ¼ 4, 6, 8)
Poly[3-(n-bromoalkyl)thiophene] (7–9, n ¼ 4, 6, 8, respectively)
(0.8 mmol of monomer units) was allowed to react with
1-methylimidazole (8 mmol) in refluxing CHCl3 (10 mL) for 3 d.
After cooling to room temperature, the main part of the solvent
mixture was evaporated and the concentrated solution (ca. 2 mL)
was poured to THF to precipitate polymers 10–12. The crude
polymers obtained were repeatedly washed with THF and
diethyl ether to remove residues of 1-methylimidazole and finally
dried under vacuum at 40 ꢀC. The solid polymers 10–12 were
further purified with refluxing diethyl ether by using a Soxhlet
ꢀ
apparatus and finally dried under vacuum at 40 C.
1
Compound 10. Yield: 72%. H NMR (CD3OD): d ¼ 1.80 (m,
2H, CH2), 2.06 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.97 (m, 2H, CH2), 3.97 (s, 3H,
N–CH3), 4.38 (m, 2H, CH2), 7.15 (s, 1H, Th), 7.62 (s, 1H, Har),
7.76 (s, 1H, Har), 9.13 (s, 1H, NCHN) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR
(CD3OD): d ¼ 27.5, 30.3, 31.5, 36.7 (CH2), 50.9 (CH3), 123.8,
124.9, 130.4, 131.8, 135.0, 137.9, 141.5 ppm. UV-visible (EtOH):
lmax ¼ 436 nm.
1
Compound 11. Yield: 79%. H NMR (CD3OD): d ¼ 1.50 (m,
4H, CH2), 1.77 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.97 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.91 (m, 2H,
CH2), 3.97 (s, 3H, N–CH3), 4.25 (m, 2H, CH2), 7.15 (s, 1H, Th),
7.60 (s, 1H, Har), 7.70 (s, 1H, Har), 9.10 (s, 1H, NCHN) ppm.
13C{1H} NMR (CD3OD): d ¼ 27.3, 30.1, 30.4, 31.3, 31.6, 36.8
(CH2), 51.0 (CH3), 123.9, 125.1, 130.4, 131.9, 135.1, 138.0, 141.6
ppm. UV-visible (EtOH): lmax ¼ 440 nm.
1
Compound 12. Yield: 81%. H NMR (CD3OD): d ¼ 1.44 (m,
8H, CH2), 1.76 (m, 2H, CH2), 1.93 (m, 2H, CH2), 2.87 (m, 2H,
CH2), 3.96 (s, 3H, N–CH3), 4.25 (m, 2H, CH2), 7.12 (s, 1H, Th),
7.61 (s, 1H, Har), 7.68 (s, 1H, Har), 9.06 (s, 1H, NCHN) ppm.
13C{1H} NMR (CD3OD): d ¼ 27.6, 30.4, 30.5, 30.6, 30.7, 31.5,
31.9, 36.9 (CH2), 51.1 (CH3), 123.9, 125.2, 130.1, 131.8, 135.1,
138.1, 141.6 ppm. UV-visible (EtOH): lmax ¼ 443 nm.
Results and discussion
Nanocomposite thin films. Given amounts of polymer, tetrae-
thoxysilane (TEOS), EtOH, hydrochloric acid (see Table 1) were
stirred to produce a transparent solution. The solution was
filtered. Thin films were then prepared by spin-coating on glass,
quartz and ITO substrates. The substrate surface was first
completely covered with the solution, and the sample rotation
was turned on immediately at 50 rpm for 8 s and then, 500 rpm
Synthesis of the monomers
Our synthetic strategy relies on the post-polymerization func-
tionalization of bromide-bearing polythiophenes to prepare
regioregular head-to-tail cationic polythiophene polyelectrolyte
containing n-(1-methylimidazolium-3-yl)alkyl (n ¼ 4, 6, 8) side
groups with bromide counterions. The regioregularity of the
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 2733–2739 | 2735