10.1002/chem.201803089
Chemistry - A European Journal
COMMUNICATION
the restricted rotation of the mesityl groups. The 29Si NMR spectrum of
4 reveals two resonance signals at δ = 9.1 and 2.9 ppm, one at lower-
field (δ = 9.1 ppm) is downfield shifted compared with that of 2. A
single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis reveals that the central
structural motive of 4 features a distorted tetrahedral (SiIISiIV)Rh(H)N
core with Rh-SiIV distances of 2.3131(8) and 2.2273(8) Å, respectively,
(see Figure S16).
[2] a) T. D. Tilley, The Chemistry of Organic Silicon Compounds, Vol. 1
(Eds.: S. Patai, Z. Rappoport,), Wiley, New York, 1989, pp. 1415-
1477; b) J. Y. Corey, Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 11291-11435.
[3] a) For a recent review on silyl ligands see: M. Simon, F. Breher,
Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 7976-7997; b) For a recent review on PSiP-
complexes see: L. Turculet, PSiP Transition-metal pincer complexes:
synthesis, bond activation, and catalysis, of pincer and pincer-type
complexes, chapter 6, in Applications in Organic Synthesis and
Catalysis, (Eds. K. J. Szabó, O.F. Wendt), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
2014; c) For a recent review on NSiN-complexes see: F. J. Fernández-
Alvarez, R. Lalrempuia, L. A. Oro, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 350, 49-
60; d) D. Ostendorf, C. Landis, H. Grützmacher, Angew. Chem. 2006,
118, 5293-5297; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5169-5173; e) Z.
Mo, Y. Liu, L. Deng, Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 11045-11049; Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 10845-10849; f) J. Sun, L. Luo, Y. Luo, L.
Deng, Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 2764-2768; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 2720-2724.
tBuONa
thf
RT
O
H
O
H
tBu
tBu
Mes
Mes
O
N
Si
Si
Si
Si
N
tBu
N
RhIII
RhIII
H
N
H
H
tBu
Ph
Ph
Cl
H
H
4
2
[4] a) M. Asay, C. Jones, M. Driess, Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 354-396; b)
S. Yao, Y. Xiong, M. Driess, Organometallics 2011, 30, 1748-1767;
c) B. Blom, D. Gallego, M. Driess, Inorg. Chem. Front. 2014, 1, 134-
148; d) S. Raoufmoghaddam,Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, M. Driess J.
Organomet. Chem. 2017, 829, 2-10; d) L. Alvarez-Rodriguez, J. A.
Cabeza, P. Garcia-Álvarez, D. Polo, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 300, 1-
28.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 4 from the reaction of 2 with tBuONa..
One possible rout to complex 4 is outlined in Scheme 2, migration of
imine from silicon to rhodium could be followed by 1,2-shift of tert-
butoxide group from rhodium to silicon. Testing the catalytic
performance of the 4 revealed that it has very similar catalytic activity
to that of 2 in the reaction of 2-phenylpyridine with norbornene. In situ
1H-NMR studies on the catalytic reactions also proved the formation of
4 as an intermediate in the catalytic process. For oxidant free rhodium-
catalyzed C-H bond functionalization, RhI species is always proposed to
be the catalytic active species.[14] We supposed that 4 might undergo Si-
O bond activation, via a tBuOH elimination, to form an olefin stabilized
RhI intermediate A (Scheme S3). Such cleavage reactions of Si-O bonds
of silyl ligands to form silylene complexes were proposed by Ogino,
Tilley, and Braun et al.[19] The routes of formation of the proposed
catalytically active RhI intermediate from 2 and 4 are presented in
Scheme S3. A tentative calculated mechanism of model catalytic
alkenylation reaction of phenylpyridine with ethylene using the RhI
intermediate A is shown in Scheme S4. Attempts to detect these genuine
catalytically active species were hitherto unsuccessful.
[5] Mo, Z.; Szilvási, T.; Zhou, Y.; Yao, S.; Driess, M. Angew. Chem. 2017,
129, 3753-3756; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 3699-3702.
[6]
a) H. Tobita, K. Hasegawa, J. J. Gabrillo Minglana, L.-S. Luh, M.
Okazaki, H. Ogino, Organometallics 1999, 18, 2058-2060; b) M.
Okazaki, N. Yamahira, J. J. G. Minglana, T. Komuro, H. Ogino, H.
Tobita, Organometallics 2008, 27, 918-926; c) T. Komuro, T. Kitano,
N. Yamahira, K. Ohta, S. Okawara, N. Mager, M. Okazaki, H. Tobita,
Organometallics 2016, 35, 1209-1217; d) T. Kitano, T. Komuro, R.
Ono, H. Tobita, Organometallics 2017, 36, 2710-2713.
[7] a) G. J. Kubas, Metal Dihydrogen and σ-Bond Complexes, Springer,
Berlin, 2001; b) M. Brookhart, M. L. H. Green, G. Parkin, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6908-6914; c) C. Hall, R. N. Perutz, Chem.
Rev. 1996, 96,3125-3146.
[8] a) J. A. Labinger, J. E. Bercaw, Nature 2002, 417, 507-514; b) P. J.
Pérez, Alkane C-H Activation by Single-Site Metal Catalysis, Vol. 38,
Springer, Berlin, 2012.
[9] a) A. J. Cowan, M. W. George, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252, 2504-
2511; b) S. Geftakis, G. E. Ball, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 9953-
9954; c) W. H. Bernskoetter, C. K. Schauer, K. I. Goldberg, M.
Brookhart, Science 2009, 326, 553-556; e) S. D. Pike, A. L. Thompson,
A. G. Algarra, D. C. Apperley, S. A. Macgregor, A. S. Weller, Science
2012, 337, 1648-1651.
[10] a) B. Rybtchinski, L. Konstantinovsky, L. J. Shimon, A. Vigalok and
D. Milstein, Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3287-3292; b) B. J. Burger, W. D.
Cotter, E. B. Coughlan, S. T. Chacon, S. Hajela, T. A. Herzog, R.
Köhn, J. Mitchell, W. E. Piers, P. J. Shapiro, J. E. Bercaw, in Ziegler
Catalysts, (Eds. G. Fink, R. Mülhaupt, H. H. Brintzinger), Springer,
Berlin, pp. 317-331, 1995; c) W. E. Piers, J. E. Bercaw, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 9406-9407.
In summary, the reaction of the first chelate NHSi-silane 1 with
[Rh(coe)2Cl]2 led to the unusual rhodium(III) complex (LSi-R-
SiMes2)RhHCl 2 featuring one agostic and two anagostic Rh-H-C
interactions. Notably, 2 can boost the selective catalytic alkenylation and
alkylation of a C-H bond in the 3-position of 2-phenylpyridine with high
catalytic efficiency under relatively mild reaction conditions. Reactivity
t
investigations on the pre-catalyst 2 towards BuONa furnished the new
agostic bis(silyl) hydridorhodium(III) complex 4, which is likely to act
as intermediate in the catalytic transformations. The high catalytic
activity of 2 surpasses those of related rhodium complexes bearing
phosphines, NHCs and bis(NHSis) as supporting ligands. The promising
steering potential of this new type of strong σ-donor NHSi-silyl scaffold
is expected to open new doorways in other catalytic transformations of
organic substrates.
[11] For divisions of agostic and anagostic interactions see: a) J. C. Lewis,
J. Wu, R. G. Bergman, J. A. Ellman, Organometallics 2005, 24, 5737-
5746: b) D. Braga, F. Grepioni, K. Biradha, G. R. Desiraju, J. Chem.
Soc. Dalton Trans. 1996, 3925-3930; c) W. Yao, O. Eisenstein, R. H.
Crabtree, Inorga. Chim. Acta. 1997, 254, 105-111.
[12] a) E. Clot, O. Eisenstein, Struct Bonding. 2004, 113, 1-36; b) P. L. A.
Popelier, G. Logothetis, J. Organomet. Chem. 1998, 555, 101-111; c)
V. Tognetti, L. Joubert, R. Raucoules, T. De Bruin, C. Adamo, J.
Phys.Chem. A 2012, 116, 5472-5479; d) M. Lein, Coord. Chem. Rev.
2009, 253, 625-634; e) L. Estévez, C. Bijani, K. Miqueu, A. Amgoune,
D. Bourissou, Angew.Chem. 2016, 128, 3475-3479; Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2016, 55, 3414-3418.
Keywords: N-Heterocyclic Silylene • DFT Calculations • Agostic
Complex • Alkenylation • Atoms in Molecules
[1] a) R. H. Crabtree, The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition
Metals, 6nd ed., Wiley, New York, 2014; b) M. Stradiotto, R. J.
Lundgren, Ligand Design in Metal Chemistry: Reactivity and
Catalysis, Wiley, Hoboken, 2016.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.