LETTER
Synthesis and Structural Elucidation of C2-Symmetrical Optically Active Macrocycles
2559
course of the macrocyclizations the stereogenic centers of enclosed chiral enviroments of the macrocycles, which
10a–c efficiently relayed their stereochemical informa- will contribute greatly to the effective asymmetric induc-
tion to the formed stereogenic axes of macrocycles 11a–c. tions, are closely associated with the axial chirality of the
biaryl systems and the central chirality of the a-amino
acid residues present in the synthesized macrocycles. The
circular dichroism (CD) measurement of (R,R,M,M)-11b
exhibited an Cotton effect of opposite sign and approxi-
mately equal intensity and shape in comparison with that
of its stereochemical counterpart (S,S,P,P)-11b (left,
Figure 3), and thus the absolute stereochemisy of the biar-
yl subunit of (R,R,M,M)-11b was assigned as M configu-
ration. In a similar way, the absolute configurations of the
present biaryls in compound (R,R,M,M)-11c were as-
signed as M configuration based on the comparison of CD
Figure 2 X-ray structure of macrocycle structure of (S,S,P,P)-11b:
spectra of (S,S,P,P)-11c and (R,R,M,M)-11c (right,
Figure 3). Overall, it should be addressed that there is a
strict stereochemical cooperativity of the present stereo-
genic centers and stereogenic axes in the macrocycles as
follows: the S configuration of the stereogenic center in-
duces the P configuration of the biaryl stereogenic axis;
the R configuration of the stereogenic center induce the M
configuration of the biaryl stereogenic axis. Based on this
concept, the absolute configurations of macrocycles 11a
were also determined as shown in Table 1 (entries 1 and
2).
top view (left) and side view (right)
The stereochemistry of macrocycle (S,S,P,P)-11b was un-
equivocally dertermined by X-ray crystallographic analy-
sis (Figure 1).16 The X-ray analysis disclosed that in the
solid-state macrocycle (S,S,P,P)-11b is C2-symmetrical
and has a chiral and elongated cavity with a dimension of
4.5 × 8.3 Å, which is defined as the cross-macrocycle dis-
tances between the four nitrogen atoms (left, Figure 2).
The side view of the molecule (S,S,P,P)-11b appears to
have a vase-like structure (right, Figure 2). As for the two
biaryl systems in (S,S,P,P)-11b, both of them are highly
twisted, and one biaryl has a 62° torsional angle and the
other one has a 65° torsional angle. In addition, it is inter-
esting to note that both of the biaryl subunits adopt P con-
figuration and exhibit almost the same orientation with
each other. We reasoned that these unique stereochemical
properties may favor the asymmetric induction behaviors
of such a type of macrocycles when they are used as chiral
ligands in the asymmetric catalysis reactions. Similarly,
the X-ray crystal structure of macrocycle (S,S,P,P)-11c
has clearly demonstrated that the macrocycle exhibits a
pair of highly restrained biaryls and thus again evidencing
P,P configurations at the two biaryl axes. It has been seen
that one of the two biaryls has a torsional angle of 57°, the
other one shows a torsional angle of 69°.
In conclusion, we have designed and synthesized novel
chiral macrocycles containing two a-amino acids and two
biaryl residues by following a multistep reaction sequence
in moderate yields. The absolute configurations of biaryl
subunits of these macrocycles were unequivocally estab-
lished by X-ray analysis and CD mesurements, indicating
that the macrocyclizations occurred in high diastereose-
lectivities. We are currently investigating the possibilities
offered by this kind of chiral macrocycles as chiral ligands
in asymmetric catalysis reactions, and the results will be
reported in short course.
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
Acknowledgment
We thank Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (No.
JC015001200902), Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation
(No. 7102010), Doctoral Scientific Research Start-up Foundation of
Beijing University of Technology (No. 52015001200701), National
Basic Research Program of China (No. 2009 CB930203).
References and Notes
Figure 3 CD spectra of (S,S,P,P)-11b vs. (R,R,M,M)-11b (left) and
(S,S,P,P)-11c vs. (R,R,M,M)-11c (right)
(1) Puglisi, A.; Benaglia, M.; Annunziata, R.; Bologna, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2947.
(2) Lewandowski, B.; Jarosz, S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 6399.
(3) Yuan, Q.; Fu, E. Q.; Wu, X. J.; Fang, M. H.; Xue, P.; Wu,
C. T.; Chen, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 3935.
(4) Ema, T.; Tanida, D.; Hamada, K.; Sakai, T. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 9129.
(5) Montero, A.; Albericio, F.; Royo, M.; Herradón, B. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2007, 1301.
Accordingly, on the basis of the above-mentioned results,
we rationalized that the torsional angles of the biaryl sub-
units in the macrocycles can be finely tuned by the intro-
duction of the different R groups as summarized in
Table 1. It has been confirmed by the X-ray crystal struc-
ture analysis of (S,S,P,P)-11b and (S,S,P,P)-11c that the
Synlett 2010, No. 17, 2557–2560 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York