Heck reactions are generally
run at relatively high tempera-
tures (> 1008C) for several
hours. However, for the flow
sequence to be effective, the re-
action has to reach a high level
of completion during the time
in which it is receiving micro-
wave irradiation while it is tra-
versing the reaction capillary;
this is in the order of minutes.
To explore how the Heck reac-
tion could be made to perform
under flow conditions,[15] we
first examined a simplified set
Scheme 2. Heck reaction between fragments 10 and 11.[16]
of starting materials (Table 1). As a control, we performed
the reaction first under batch conditions in an oil bath
(Table 1, entry 1) and found that 18 h were required to ach-
result of the target products undergoing a second Heck reac-
tion.[17] With some investigation, it was found that the excess
tryamine from the acylation reaction (used crude in the next
step) was present as the HCl salt and was being deprotonat-
ed by the triethylamine that was originally used for the sub-
sequent Heck reaction. The resultant tyramine free base (in
excess) then underwent a Michael reaction with compound
11, the initially formed desired product, thus removing it
from the reaction mixture; the aryl iodide, now in excess
due to the depletion of 11, underwent a second undesired
Heck coupling. This problem was overcome by the use of
equimolar quantities of tryamine and acryloyl chloride and
only a slight excess of Hunigꢁs base in the Heck reaction,
which now led to good yields of analogues 1 and 3 (see
bottom of Scheme 2). The addition of tetrabutylammonium
bromide and Hunigꢁs base, which has a soluble conjugate
acid, were key to this yield improvement and instrumental
to producing larger quantities (vide infra).
Table 1. Optimization of the Heck reaction.
Entry
14
[equiv]
Conc. of
Time or
Temp.
Conversion
[%][d]
G
13[a] [m]
flow rate[b]
[8C][c]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1.5
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.9
1.5
18 h
20
20
15
20
90
100
76
85
94
92
65
complex
mixture
100
135
125
140
110
140
20
20
With the first two steps worked out, we extended the flow
process to include a subsequent alkylation step to approach
7 and aplysamine 6 (8) (Scheme 3).[18] Acylation proceeded
cleanly and the crude material was used directly, as usual, in
the Heck reaction. Coupling of mono bromide 11a proceed-
ed uneventfully and in excellent recovery. However, unex-
pectedly, the dibromide (11b) underwent reduction of one
of the bromides. To probe the origin of this undesired reac-
tion, we first repeated it with identical reactions conditions
only in batch, and the same result was attained. Thus, the
side reaction is not a consequence of flow. Clearly, the pro-
pensity for reduction diminishes when one of the bromides
is removed as we never observed reduction in the case of
11a. Perhaps the hydroxyl group in 17 makes the ring elec-
tron-rich enough to avoid oxidative addition of a single bro-
mide under these reaction conditions, but the presence of
the second bromide tips the balance and activates the ring.
The next question is the hydride source for this reduction.
We suspected the phenol and to test this we protected it as
a methyl ether; this halted reduction confirming the phenol
as the source of the problem.
[a] Concentration is based on 14. [b] The experiment in entry 1 is a batch
reaction performed in an oil bath for 18 h, all other entries are flowed re-
actions and the rate listed is in mLminÀ1. [c] The temperature listed in
entry 1 is of the oil bath. All other temperatures are the temperature re-
corded off the surface of the reaction capillary by the internal IR sensor
of the Biotage Initiator Synthesizer. [d] Percent conversion is determined
by taking an aliquot from the eluent stream from the capillary (crude ma-
terial) and calculating the ratio of the peaks of the starting materials and
product in the proton NMR spectrum.
ieve full conversion. Knowing that the flowing reaction only
resides for a few minutes in the microwave irradiation zone,
we irradiated it with enough power to create temperatures
well in excess of 1008C (Table 1, entries 2–7). With optimi-
zation of concentration, flow rate, and temperature, excel-
lent levels of conversion were attained using MACOS.
Using the conditions outlined in Table 1, entry 5, compounds
1, 2, 5, and 6 were prepared from their corresponding Heck
precursors (10 and 11, where compound 11 was used directly
from the acylation procedure) in 32, 22, 48, and 46% yield,
respectively (Scheme 2).[16]
From the above applied results, some shortcomings of the
Heck conditions were realized. Most importantly, yield
dropped off sharply, which was found to be primarily the
Carrying on with the preparation of the final tyramine an-
alogues, we set out to alkylate the phenol position. The reac-
tion was thought to work best with a soluble base that had a
12798
ꢀ 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 12797 – 12800