Notes and references
‡ X-Ray diffraction data for 1. C38H55MgN4, M = 579.16, monoclini◦c,
˚
˚
˚
P21/c, a = 12.7380(4) A, b = 12.9120(5) A, c = 22.1870(7) A, b = 90.308(2) ,
3
-3
˚
V = 3649.1(2) A , Z = 2, r = 1.052 g cm , R1 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.0801,
wR2 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.2098, R1 [all data] = 0.1312, wR2 [all data] = 0.2424,
measured reflections = 50 456, unique reflections = 8271, Rint = 0.1170. X-
Ray diffraction data for 2. C39H52MgN4, M = 601.16, monoclinic, P21/m,
3
˚
˚
˚
˚
a = 9.4213(2) A, b = 20.5902(6) A, c = 9.9732(2) A, V = 1819.79(8) A ,
b = 109.844(2)◦, Z = 2, r = 1.097 g cm-3, R1 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.0537, wR2
[I > 2s(I)] = 0.2192, R1 [all data] = 0.0806, wR2 [all data] = 0.1456,
measured reflections = 32 152, unique reflections = 4267, Rint = 0.0617. X-
Fig. 3 Numbering scheme employed in the refinement of the 1,2-dihy-
dropyridide anion within the X-ray structure of compound 2.
Ray diffraction data for 3. C39H52MgN4, M = 601.16, orthorhombic, Pbmn,
3
˚
˚
˚
˚
a = 9.6737(2) A, b = 18.2623(4) A, c = 20.6525(4) A, V = 3648.55(13) A ,
Z = 4, r = 1.094 g cm-3, R1 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.0476, wR2 [I > 2s(I)] = 0.1111, R1
[all data] = 0.0662, wR2 [all data] = 0.1268, measured reflections = 39 041,
unique reflections = 3303, Rint = 0.0918.
H16A is clearly only present half of the time i.e. only one half
of the pyridine ring has been reduced. H16A–H16B are closer to
each other than one would expect for a CH2 group. No additional
attempts were made to restrain the H ◊ ◊ ◊ H distance in this
moiety.
1 For a recent review, see: P. L. Diaconescu, Curr. Org. Chem., 2008, 12,
1388.
2 See, for example: (a) T. I. Gountchev and T. D. Tilley, Organometallics,
1999, 18, 2896; (b) E. Kirillov, C. W. Lehmann, A. Razavi and J.-F.
Carpentier, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2004, 943.
The observation of both potential isomers during the early
stages of the reaction implies that the ultimate conversion to the
symmetrical 1,4-dihydropyridide-containing isomer, compound 3,
occurs under overall thermodynamic control. This observation
was borne out by calculations performed on model complexes of
compounds 2 and 3 in which the complete b-diketiminate ligand
was replaced by [HC{(H)CN(Me)}]- in the interests of computa-
tional expense. Despite this simplification, geometry optimisations
performed at the B3LYP density functional theory with LAN2DZ
pseudopotentials (and basis set) implemented in the Gaussian03
suite of programmes provided a good approximation of the local
bond lengths and angles about each Mg atom in comparison
to the crystallographically deduced structures.12 Consistent with
the experimentally observed transformation of compound 2 into
compound 3 the isomer containing the 1,4-dihydropyridide anion
was calculated to be some 3.48 kcal mol-1 lower in total energy than
its 1,2-dihydropyridide isomer, while both species are significantly
lower (1,2-isomer, 17.2 kcal mol-1; 1,4-isomer 20.7 kcal mol-1)
than the alternative pyridine-adducted magnesium hydride formu-
3 For example: J. A. Pool, B. L. Scott and J. L. Kiplinger, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 2591.
4 E. Furimsky and F. E. Massoth, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2005, 47, 297
and references therein.
5 (a) C. T. Carver and P. L. Diaconescu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
7558; (b) K. L. Miller, B. N. Williams, D. Benitez, C. T. Carver, K. R.
Ogilby, E. Tkatchouk, W. A. Goddard III and P. L. Diaconescu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 342.
6 For a review, see: A. G. M. Barrett, M. R. Crimmin, M. S. Hill and P.
A. Procopiou, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 2010, 466, 927.
7 (a) K. Ziegler and H. Zeiser, Chem. Ber., 1930, 63, 1847; (b) D.
R. Armstrong, R. E. Mulvey, D. Barr, R. Snaith and D. Reed, J.
Organomet. Chem., 1988, 350, 191; (c) W. Clegg, L. Dunbar, L.
Horsburgh and R. E. Mulvey, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996,
35, 753; (d) P. T. Lansbury and J. O. Peterson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963,
85, 2236.
8 Addition reactions of Grignard and dialkylmagnesium reagents to
N-methoxycarbonyl pyridinium chlorides and N-silylpyridinium ions
have, however, been reported as methods for the selective synthesis
for N-methoxycarbonyl and N-silyl-1,4-dihydropyridines: (a) R. Yam-
aguchi, Y. Nakazono and M. Kawanisi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24,
1801; (b) J. Bra¨ckow and K. T. Wanner, Tetrahedron, 2005, 62, 2395.
9 A. P. Dove, V. C. Gibson, P. Hormnirum, E. L. Marshall, J. A. Segal,
A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Dalton Trans., 2003, 3088.
10 For example, see ref. 9 and (a) V. C. Gibson, J. A. Segal, A. J. P. White
and D. J. Williams, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 7120; (b) P. J. Bailey,
R. A. Coxall, C. M. Dick, S. Fabre and S. Parsons, Organometallics,
2001, 20, 798.
11 (a) S. P. Green, C. Jones and A. Stasch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008,
47, 9079; (b) M. Arrowsmith, M. S. Hill, D. J. MacDougall and M.
F. Mahon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 4013; (c) S. J. Bonyhady,
C. Jones, S. Nembenna, A. Stasch, A. J. Edwards and G. J. McIntyre,
Chem. Eur. J., 2010, 16, 938.
1
lation, [HC{(H)CN(Me)}Mg(H)-k -NC5H5]·C5H5N. We interpret
these results as a clear indication that compounds 2 and 3 may be
regarded as the respective kinetic and thermodynamic products
of the reaction of an initially formed magnesium hydride species
with pyridine. We are seeking to elaborate this reactivity in the
manner provided by the precedent illustrated in Scheme 1, to
incorporate further heterocyclic substrates and extend our studies
to the heavier and more electropositive members of the group 2
series of elements.
12 Gaussian 03, Revision C.02, M. J. Frisch et al. Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT, 2004.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Dalton Trans., 2010, 39, 11129–11131 | 11131
©