Page 3 of 5
Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Please do not adjust margins
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
(3a), p‐methoxyphenyl‐ (5a), p‐methylphenyl‐(5b), and α‐naphthyl‐ On the basis of the above results, a possible mechanism was
(5c) cinnamyl moiety were well tolerated and provided the proposed in Scheme 4. We envisioned thaDt OthI:e10s.t1r0o3n9g/Cc7oOoBr0d0in91a2tGing
corresponding products in 80−92% yields. In addiꢀon to the aryl ability of nitrile functionality with the transition metals13 has changed
substitution at γ‐position on α,β,γ,δ‐unsaturated ketonitrile, the the course of the reaction. Instead of annulation (Scheme 4, path
aryl substitution at β‐position is also well tolerated (5d‐e). a),12 probably, the coordination of nitrile functionality with PdII
Interestingly, starting with an appropriately designed substrate, complex (intermediate I, path b) occurs, followed by formal
α,β,γ,δ‐unsaturated ketonitrile with different aryl groups at γ‐, δ‐, elimination of HX to form ketenimine (or keteniminate)
and β‐positions could be synthesized as shown in the case of 5d‐5f.
intermediates II and III. Presumably, the presence of acid facilitates
such tautomerization. Further, the intermediate III undergoes an
oxidative β‐deprotonation/de‐palladation, as shown through the
arrow pushing, to produce the α,β,γ,δ‐unsaturated ketonitrile.
Notably, the conformational stability of III over II (steric crowding)
could be the probable reason for the observed diastereoselectivity.
Further, the Pd(0) was reoxidized to Pd(II) with the aid of
benzoquinone. The control experiments (see, Supporting
Information) also indicate that the nitrile functional group is assisting
the direct oxidation of α‐cinnamyl‐β‐ketonitrile to give α,β,γ,δ‐
unsaturated ketonitriles.
Scheme 3. Substrate Scope: Variations of Cinnamyl Counterparta,b
In summary, we have developed a process for the nitrile assisted
direct oxidation of readily available α‐cinnamyl‐β‐keto‐nitriles into
valuable α,β,γ,δ‐unsaturated ketonitrile. The disclosed synthetic
strategy involves a chemoselective oxidation over the oxidative
annulation of α‐cinnamyl‐β‐keto‐nitriles, which furnishes α,β,γ,δ‐
unsaturated ketonitrile in good yield and with broad substrate scope.
Acknowledgement
This work has been financially supported by IISER Bhopal. R.N. is
grateful to CSIR, New Delhi and R.R.R. is thankful to IISER Bhopal for
their research fellowship. We thank Mr. Lalit Mohan Jha, IISER
Bhopal, for single crystal XRD analysis.
References
1. (a) Q. Zhang, T. Fang and X. Tong, Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 8095; (b) L.
Zhang, X. Xu, Q. Shao, L. Pan and Q. Liu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2013,
11, 7393; (c) X. Wang, T. Fang and X. Tong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2011, 50, 5361; (d) C. D. Fusco, C. Tedesco and A. Lattanzi, J. Org.
Chem., 2011, 76, 676; (e) J. O. Guevara‐Pulido, J. M. Andrés and R.
Pedrosa, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2014, 8072.
2. (a) R. H. Crabtree, M. F. Mellea, J. M. Mihelcic and J. M. Quirk, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 107; (b) R. H. Crabtree, P. C. Demou, D.
Edon, J. M. Mihelcic, C. A. Parnell, J. M. Quirk and G. E. Morris, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 6994; (c) R. H. Crabtree, The
Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals, 5th edn, John
Wiley and Sons. 2009.
aReaction conditions: α‐cinnamyl‐β‐keto‐nitriles 1 (0.12 mmol),
PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (5 mol %), BQ (1.0 equiv), PTS (1.0 equiv), THF (1.0
mL). b Isolated yields after column chromatography. c (E: Z = 1:0.1). d
(E: Z = 1:0.07). ePdCl2(CH3CN)2 (10 mol %) was used.
3. For recent reports on palladium‐catalyzed aerobic oxidation
covering dehydrogenation reactions, see: (a) J. Muzart, Eur. J. Org.
Chem., 2010, 3779; (b) S. S. Stahl, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43,
3400; (c) D. Walker, and J. D. Hiebert, Chem. Rev., 1967, 67, 153; (d)
H. J. Reich and S. Wollowitz, Org. React. 1993, 44, 1; (e) J.
Muzart, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2010, 3779; (f) S. S. Stahl and T. Diao,
Comp. Org. Synth., 2014, 7, 178; (g) A. Turlik, Y. Chen and T. R.
Newhouse, Synlett 2016, 27, 331; (h) M. V. Leskinen, A.
Madarász, K.‐T. Yip, A. Vuorinen, I. Pápai, A. J. Neuvonen and P.
M. Pihko, J. Am. Chem.Soc., 2014, 136, 6453; (i) A.‐V. Iosub and
S.‐S. Stahl, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 8201.
4. (a) Y. Izawa, D. Pun and S. S. Stahl, Science 2011, 333, 209;
(b) T. Diao and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14566;
(c) S. S. Stahl, Science 2005, 309, 1824; (d) T. Diao, T. J.
Wadzinski and Stahl, S. S. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 887; (e) T. Diao, D.
Pun and S. S. Stahl, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 8205; (f) Y.
Izawa, C. Zheng and S. S. Stahl, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52,
3672.
Scheme 4. Proposed Mechanism for Current Oxidation
5. A. Hajra, Y. Wei and N. Yoshikai, Org. Lett., 2012, 14, 5488.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1‐3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins