Organic Letters
Letter
electrophilic and nucleophilic at the same carbon. This kind of
ambivalent reactivity is a characteristic of carbene. In recent
years, dioxaphospholene (6), also known as the Kukhtin−
Ramirez adduct, which can be conveniently derived from a 1,2-
dicarbonyl compound, has received attention as a highly useful
carbene surrogate that can react with an electrophile and a
nucleophile in a sequential manner.6,7 The addition of an
electrophile onto 6 leads to the formation of an oxaphospho-
nium species 7, which has an excellent leaving group that can
be easily displaced by a nucleophile to give the geminally
difunctionalized product 8. Here, we report a tandem, one-step
geminal chlorofluorination of 1,2-diketone with a halenium
and a halide by taking advantage of the carbene-like reactivity
of dioxaphospholene.
Because of the nucleophilic reactivity of the P(III) reagent,
the scope of a compatible electrophile in the Kukhtin−Ramirez
reaction is rather limited. In our case, the P(III) nucleophile
and the halogen electrophile will be consumed together in an
unproductive way by forming a halophosphonium adduct
unless the complete formation of dioxaphospholene is ensured
prior to the addition of a halenium reagent. A brief survey of
the P(III) reagent revealed that trialkyl phosphite is capable of
facile and complete production of dioxaphospholene with 1,2-
diketone.8 For example, the reaction of triethyl phosphite and
benzil afforded dioxaphospholene 6a quantitatively (Figure
2A). However, the subsequent halogenation was accompanied
kinetic stability of the two P−O bonds. The remaining site is
occupied by a secondary amino group, which is also difficult to
dealkylate. This newly designed P(III) reagent can be readily
prepared in one step from a commercially available
chlorophosphite. With 10, the reaction of benzil (11a)
produced the dioxaphospholene adduct 12a cleanly as
observed by ReactIR and 31P NMR spectroscopy. Gratifyingly,
the subsequent treatment with a fluorenium [(PhSO2)2NF,
NFSI] and a soluble chloride (n-Bu4NCl) afforded the geminal
chlorofluoride 13a in 76% yield without any detectable sign of
dealkylation (Figure 2C). A small portion of the dioxaphos-
pholene 12a reverted back to the starting material 11a, which
accounted for the mass balance. In addition, no reaction was
observed between 12a and n-Bu4NCl. Thus, the chlorofluori-
nation is clearly initiated by the electrophilic fluorination.
Encouraged by this promising preliminary result, we
evaluated several combinations of other halogenating reagents
prior to the substrate survey (Table 1). In contrast to the fairly
a
Table 1. Survey of Halogenating Reagents
b
b
entry
X+
X−
13a (%)
11a (%)
1
2
3
(PhSO2)2NF
Selectfluor
(PhSO2)2NF
(PhSO2)2NF
(PhSO2)2NF
NCS
n-Bu4NCl
n-Bu4NCl
LiCl
n-Bu4NCl
n-Bu4NCl
n-Bu4NF
n-Bu4NF
78
3
15
26
0
13
26
45
39
0
c
4
5
d
6
7
0
2
11
18
PhthN-Cl
a
Reaction conditions: 11a (1.0 mmol), 10 (1.0 mmol), X+ (1.2
b
mmol), and X− (1.2 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (6.0 mL). Isolated yields after
column chromatography. With 2 equiv of 10. With 4 equiv of 10.
c
d
clean reaction with NFSI (entry 1), the use of another popular
electrophilic fluorinating reagent, Selectfluor, afforded a
complex mixture (entry 2). The mass balance was poor, and
only a trace amount of the desired product 13a was isolated.
Interestingly, when poorly soluble LiCl was employed, a
substantial amount of starting material was regenerated (entry
3). Because the displacement with Cl− is slow, a large portion
of fluorooxyphosphonium intermediate must have remained
unreacted and then been hydrolyzed to 1,2-diketone upon
aqueous workup. The use of an excess amount of 10 was not
beneficial. With 2 equiv of 10, product formation was
significantly attenuated (entry 4). Furthermore, the halogen-
ation was completely suppressed when 4 equiv of 10 was
employed (entry 5), and dioxaphospholene 12a remained as a
major component in the crude mixture. As mentioned above,
the excess P(III) reagent has probably consumed the
electrophilic fluorinating reagent. Switching the roles of
halenium and halide was found to be detrimental. A complex
mixture was obtained from the reaction with a chlorenium (N-
chlorosuccinimide or N-chlorophthalimide) and a fluoride (n-
Bu4NF), and the desired product formation was negligible
(entries 6 and 7). As proposed earlier, the introduction of a
small fluorine substituent at the initial electrophilic addition
step is beneficial for the subsequent nucleophilic displacement.
Figure 2. Design of the phosphorus(III) reagent.
by a serious side reaction. Instead of the desired SN2
displacement at the activated α-carbon, a nucleophilic
dealkylation took place at the alkoxy group of phosphite to
give phosphate 9, and no geminal chlorofluoride was obtained.
Thus, it turned out that two SN2 reactions are competing in
intermediate 7a. To facilitate the desired SN2 reaction at the α-
carbon, the steric hindrance around this center must be
alleviated by employing a small electrophilic halogen, i.e., F+.
In addition, to suppress the undesired dealkylation, we came
up with a neopentyl glycol-derived P(III) reagent 10 that
should be resistant to nucleophilic displacement (Figure 2B).
The bidentate nature of the diol moiety will also increase the
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX