developed thiol protecting groups9 either cannot be removed
by hydrazine or are unstable to SPPS.
To solve the above problems, we conjecture that the new
protecting group can exploit the Acm strategy by using an
acylamidomethyl group that is stable to SPPS. As a con-
sequence, the challenge becomes to design a hydrazine-
based approach to rupture the amide bond in the acylami-
domethyl moiety. Noting the difficulty of amide bond
cleavage under mild conditions, we turn to the idea of
using intramolecular acyl transfer to promote the depro-
tection reaction. Previous studies by the groups of Suggs16
and Hansen17 provide interesting examples for rapid cleav-
age of unactivated amide bonds at neutral pH (Figure 1).
Accordingly, we designed Hgm and Hqm groups (nomen-
clature for Hgm and Hqm is explained in the Supporting
Information) for the protection of a thiol (Figure 1), in
which the OAc moiety is removed by aqueous hydrazine to
trigger the deprotection event.
Figure 1. Design of new thiol protecting groups.
peptides. The tBu and MeBzl (4-methylbenzyl) protecting
groups have been shown to be useful in the stepwise
formation of disulfide bridges,5,11 but their deprotection
requires harsh conditions. For practical purposes, the
method of choice is the use of an acetamidomethyl (Acm)
group7,12 that is compatible with both tert-butoxycarbonyl
(Boc) and 9-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl (Fmoc) SPPS.
However, the deprotection of Acm either needs touse toxic
heavy metals7,12 or may cause side reactions (e.g., iodina-
tion at the Trp and Tyr residues).13 Thus, new protec-
tion groups for the Cys side chain are still needed not
only to overcome the problems associated with Acm
but also to permit a more adaptable manipulation of
Cys residues.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Hqm-Protected Cys
In our studies on protein chemical synthesis,14 we ques-
tion the possibility of developing a new Cys side chain
protecting group that can be removed by aqueous hydra-
zine. Previous studies on protein chemistry have shown
that the aqueous hydrazine condition provides a mild and
operationally simple method for the removal of ester protec-
tion of alcohols.15 The hydrazine method is also compatible
with SPPS and ligation chemistry as demonstrated in the
synthesis of full-length glycoproteins such as diptericin.15
Thus, we envisage that a hydrazine-sensitive, yet stable-to-
SPPS, thiol protecting group would be highly useful for
peptide and protein chemistry. However, the previously
The synthesis of Hqm-protected Cys is illustrated in
Scheme 1. The previously made 117,18 (as a racemic mixture)
is converted to 2 through TBS protection and N-alkyla-
tion. Then a key step is the reaction of 2 with formaldehyde
to form an N-(hydroxymethyl)acylamide intermediate,
which without separation is converted to the correspond-
ing acylamidomethyl acetate. Nucleophilic substitution of
the OAc group by Boc-Cys-OtBu affords 3, which is con-
verted to 4 through standard protecting group transforma-
tions. Finally, 4 is convertedtoBoc-Cys(Hqm)-OH (5) and
Fmoc-Cys(Hqm)-OH (6). Note that 3-6 are synthesized
as inseparable diastereomeric mixtures. Below we will show
that these diastereomeric mixtures do not interfere with
their applications in peptide and protein chemistry. Besides,
(11) (a) Musiol, H. J.; Moroder, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
7624. (b) Kl€uver, E.; Schulz-Maronde, S.; Scheid, S.; Meyer, B.; Forssmann,
W. G.; Adermann, K. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 9804.
(12) Veber, D. F.; Milkowski, J. D.; Varga, S. L.; Denkewalter, R. G.;
Hirschmann J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 5456. (b) Okamoto, R.; Souma,
S.; Kajihara, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 2494.
(13) (a) Mullen, D. G.; Weigel, B.; Barany, G.; Distefano, M. D.
J. Pept. Sci. 2010, 16, 219. (b) Wu, Z.; Alexandratos, J.; Ericksen, B.;
Lubkowski, J.; Gallo, R. C.; Lu, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101,
11587.
(14) (a) Zheng, J. S.; Cui, H. K.; Fang, G. M.; Xi, W. X.; Liu, L.
ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 511. (b) Fang, G. M.; Cui, H. K.; Zheng, J. S.; Liu,
L. ChemBioChem 2010, 11, 1061.
(16) Suggs, J. W.; Pires, R. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2227.
(17) Fernandes, N. M.; Fache, F.; Rosen, M.; Nguyen, P. L.; Hansen,
D. E. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6413.
(18) Fache, F. Synlett 2004, 15, 2827.
(19) Breil, B. Y.; Ludden, P. W.; Triplett, E. W. J. Bacteriol. 1993,
175, 3693.
(15) (a) Tan, Z.; Shang, S.; Halkina, T.; Yuan, Y.; Danishefsky, S. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5424. (b) Wu, B.; Chen, J.; Warren, J. D.;
Chen, G.; Hua, Z.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4116.
(c) Shin, Y.; Winans, K. A.; Backes, B. J.; Kent, S. B. H.; Ellman, J. A.;
Bertozzi, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 11684.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011
569