Scheme 2. Possible Routes Leading to Furan Acetal 4
Scheme 3. 18O-Assisted Analysis of Epoxidation-Cyclization
Pathwaya
acetal 6 and isomerization to the more stable furan acetal
4.9 In support of path A (cyclization by way of syn-3),
epoxidation of allylic alcohol 2 with m-CPBA did lead to
an isolable epoxide that on treatment with borontrifluor-
ide etherate provided acetal furan 4. Based on literature
precedent, we assumed theepoxide produced in theperacid
epoxidation was syn-3.10 However, direct assignment of
the syn/anti relative stereochemistry of 2,3-epoxy alcohols
by NMR analysis is historically difficult.11 In order to
provide evidence for syn-3 we labeledthe C21 carbonyl of 2
with an 18O isotope. Epoxidation of 18O-2 followed by
cyclization of the intermediate γ,δ-epoxyketone to furan
18O-4 would allow path A (syn-3) and path B (anti-3) to be
distinguished by assignment of the 18O position in furan 18O-4
based on the expected 18O-induced shift of the adjacent carbon
signal in the 13C NMR spectrum (Scheme 2).12
a NMR analysis assisted by premixing of 16O- and 18O-labeled 4.
2 to afford γ,δ-ketoepoxide syn-3 followed by a rapid
cyclization starts with the preorganization of aldol adduct
2 by an intramolecular hydrogen bond (Figure 3).14 We
speculated incorporation of a second hydrogen bond by
way of the C19 hydroxyl group may alter stereoselectivity
to favor the anti epoxy alcohol or allow isolation of the syn-
2,3-epoxy alcohol by slowing the rate of keto-epoxide
cyclization (Scheme 4). In the latter case we would examine
a 6-endo closure of the syn epoxy alcohol promoted by
aqueous solvent to afford the ammocidin acetal-pyran
based on the work of Jamison.5
The 18O-labeled ketone (18O-2) was readily prepared by
stirring ketone 2 in THF using 18O-labeled water and trace
HCl. After 1 h, 18O-2 was isolated and determined to be
>99% 18O labeled.13 Exposure of 18O-2 to VO(acac)2/
TBHP led to the isolation of 18O-4. Examination of the 13
C
NMR spectrum of 18O-4 indicated resonances correspond-
ing to C21 and C24 carbons were accompanied by 18O
induced shifts (Scheme 3). The combination of assigned
stereochemistry and isotope position in 18O-4 (Scheme 3)
indicatessyn-2,3-epoxyalcohol3underwenta5-exoclosure
to 4 (path A, Scheme 2). In contrast, 18O incorporation was
not observed at the C25 carbon as would be expected for a
6-endo closure (path B, Scheme 2).
A tentative model used to rationalize the observed
proclivity for stereoselective epoxidation of aldol adduct
Figure 3. Assumed hydrogen bonding of C20-C28 and
C16-C28 fragments.
(9) Merck Molecular Force Field calculations (MMFF94) estimate
furan acetal 4 to be 1.3 kcal more stable then pyran acetal 6.
(10) (a) Loh, T. P.; Feng, L. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3223–
3226. (b) Smith, A. B., III; Adams, C. M.; Barbosa, S. A. L.; Degnan,
A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 350–351. (c) Fleming, K. N.; Taylor,
R. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1728–1730.
(11) (a) Mihelich, E. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 4729–4732. (b)
Rossiter, B. E.; Verhoeven, T. R.; Sharpless, K. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1979, 4733–4736.
Preparation of the C16-C28 fragment of ammocidin
(Figure 3) started with a double diastereoselective Mu-
kaiyama aldol reaction between aldehyde 8 and silyl enol
ether 9. Aldehyde 8 was prepared in five steps from (-)-malic
(14) In the case of the vanadium-mediated epoxidation coordination
of either the C23 hydroxyl group and/or C21 carbonyl may be con-
sidered.
(15) (a) Saito, S.; Hasegawa, T.; Inaba, M.; Nishida, R.; Fujii, T.;
Nomizu, S.; Moriwake, T. Chem. Lett. 1984, 1389–1392. (b) Saito, S.;
Ishikawa, T.; Kuroda, A.; Koga, K.; Moriwake, T. Tetrahedron 1992,
48, 4067–4086.
(12) (a) Gree, D.; Gree, R.; Lowinger, T. B.; Martelli, J.; Negri, J. T.;
Paquette, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8841–8846. (b) Risley,
J. M.; Vanetten, R. L.; Uncuta, C.; Balaban, A. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1984, 106, 7836–7840. (c) Wilgis, F. P.; Neumann, T. E.; Shiner, V. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4435–4446.
(13) The extent of 18O incorporation was determined by LC-MS.
758
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2011