Ye et al.
JOCFeatured Article
(d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.38 (dt, J = 10.8, 7.2 Hz, 1H), 4.22 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 3.00 (s, 3H), 2.51 (dq, J = 6.9, 1.5 Hz, 2H).
47. To a solution of 46 (5.4 g, 3.2 mmol) in DMSO (20 mL),
NaCN (1.6 g, 3.2 mmol), and NaI (480 mg, 3.2 mmol) were
added under an N2 atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at 55 °C
for 12 h. After the reaction was complete, water (50 mL) was
added. The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether. The extract
was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under
vacuum. The residue was purified by distillation to give 47 (2.8 g,
89% yield, colorless liquid): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 5.64 (d, J =
10.8 Hz, 1H), 5.41 (m, 1H), 2.40 (m, 4H).
48. The compound was prepared by a modification of the
literature procedure.37 To a solution of 47 (1.1 g, 11 mmol) in a
2:1 (volume ratio) mixture of THF and HMPA was slowly
added via syringe a solution of LDA (6.1 mL 1.8 M in THF, 11
mmol) at -78 °C under an N2 atmosphere. After the solution
was stirred for 30 min at -78 °C, 1-bromo-2-butyne (1.6 g, 15
mmol) was added.38 The mixture was stirred for 3 h at -78 °C
and then was warmed to room temperature. After the reaction
was complete, water (40 mL) was added. The mixture was
extracted with diethyl ether. The extract was dried with MgSO4,
and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue was
purified by silica gel chromatography (hexane/ethyl acetate) to
give 48 (750 mg, 45% yield over two steps): 1H NMR (CDCl3)
δ 5.69 (m, 2H), 5.44 (m, 2H), 2.58 (p, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (m,
4H), 1.66 (dp, J = 6.9, 0.9 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 128.4,
128.2, 125.1, 125.0, 122.1, 32.0, 29.13, 29.11, 13.2; HRMS (ESI)
calcd for C10H12D3NNa 175.1290, found 175.1295.
5. Under an N2 atmosphere, 48 (350 mg, 2.3 mmol) was added
to a suspension of LiAlH4 (150 mg, 4 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL)
at 0 °C, and the mixture was stirred overnight at room tem-
perature. After the reaction was complete, water (0.5 mL) was
added. To the crude reaction mixture Et3N (1 mL) and TsCl
(570 mg, 3 mmol) were added via a syringe. The mixture was
stirred for 12 h. After the reaction was complete, water (20 mL)
was added. The mixture was extracted with diethyl ether. The
extract was dried with MgSO4, and the solvent was removed
under vacuum. The residue was purified by silica gel chroma-
tography (ethyl acetate/hexanes) to afford 5 (550 mg, 77% yield,
colorless oil): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.74 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 2H),
7.31 (dt, J = 8.4, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 5.51 (m, 2H), 5.29 (m, 2H), 4.54 (t,
J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.87 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.01 (t,
J = 6.9 Hz, 4H), 1.60 (m, 1H), 1.55 (dt, J = 6.9, 0.9 Hz, 3H); 2H
NMR (CHCl3) δ 1.49 (s, 3D); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 143.5, 137.2,
129.9, 127.9, 127.8, 127.3, 126.3, 126.2, 46.9, 39.1, 29.43, 29.41,
21.7, 13.1; HRMS (ESI) calcd for C17H22D3NO2SNa 333.1692,
found 333.1705.
theory (RDFT)40 calculations were performed with the hybrid
density-functional, B3LYP.41,42 A combination of the Stuttgart
RSC 1997 ECP43 for Pd and the all-electron 6-31þG(d) basis
sets (Basis I)44 for all other atoms were used for gas-phase
geometry optimization and normal-mode analyses. Full geome-
try optimizations were carried out in internal coordinates using
the Berny algorithm.45 Frequency calculations were performed
at optimized geometries and transition states, confirming that
each optimized minimum has zero imaginary frequencies and
each optimized transition state has exactly one imaginary
frequency. When visual inspection of the single negative eigen-
value defining a saddle point did not clearly confirm the reaction
trajectory, IRC calculations were performed to verify that the
identified transition state corresponded to the appropriate
reactant/product potential energy surface.46 Zero-point energy
and additional thermochemical corrections were calculated at
80 °C using the identified normal modes. Charge analyses were
carried out on converged spin-restricted density matrices using
the natural population analysis (NPA) method47 as implemen-
ted within NBO 3.1 in G03.
At the calculated stationary points, solvation-corrected sin-
gle-point total energy calculations were carried out with the Pd
basis detailed above and the 6-311þG(d,p) basis (Basis II) on all
other atoms with electrostatic and nonelectrostatic solvation
effects evaluated using the integral-equation-formalism polariz-
able-continuum model (IEF-PCM).48 These calculations were
used to predict the solvation free energy under typical catalytic
conditions (i.e., toluene solvent at 80 °C (353 K)). The solvation
cavity was generated using UFF radii, explicitly treating hydro-
gen atoms, and the radii were scaled by a factor of 1.2. The PCM
input was modified with the following parameters to define the
physical characteristics of the solvent (ε = 2.24, F = 0.810 g cm-1
,
3
˚
r = 2.82 A). The dielectric constant (ε) used here was determined
with eq 9.49 The temperature range over which eq 9 is
reported is 207-316 K; however, we find that eq 9 repro-
duces, with necessary accuracy, dielectric constants at the
higher temperature examined here.50 The density (F) of toluene at
353 K was determined using a 24-parameter empirical model
(40) Koch, W., Holthausen, M. C. A Chemist’s Guide to Density Func-
tional Theory; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2000.
(41) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1372–1377.
(42) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789.
(43) (a) The Stuttgart RSC 1997 ECP basis set for Pd was obtained from
the Extensible Computational Chemistry Environment Basis Set Database,
version 02/25/04, as developed and distributed by the Molecular Science
Computing Facility, Environmental and Molecular Sciences Laboratory,
which is part of the Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P.O. Box 999, Richland,
WA 99352, and funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Pacific
Northwest Laboratory is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Battelle
Memorial Institute for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-
Computational Studies. All computations were performed
with the Gaussian 03 (G03) program39 using resources provided
by NSF TeraGrid partners. Spin-restricted density functional
€
AC06-76RLO 1830. (b) Andrae, D.; Haussermann, U.; Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.;
Preuss, H. Theor. Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 123–141.
(44) Hehre, W. J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, L. P. v. R.; Pople, J. A. Ab Initio
Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, 1986.
(45) (a) Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Schlegel, H. B.; Frisch, M. J. J. Comput.
Chem. 1996, 17, 49–56. (b) Peng, C. Y.; Schlegel, H. B. Isr. J. Chem. 1993, 33,
449–454.
(46) (a) Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 2154–2161.
(b) Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 94, 5523–5527.
(47) Reed, A. E.; Weinstock, R. B.; Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83,
735–746.
(48) For an overview of solvation models and reviews on PCM methods,
see: (a) Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999–
3093. (b) Cramer, C. J.; Truhlar, D. G. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2161–2200. For
(37) Petschen, I.; Parrilla, A.; Bosch, M. P.; Amela, C.; Botar, A. A.;
Camps, F.; Guerrero, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3299–3309.
(38) Kurth, M. J.; Decker, O. H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 5769–5775.
(39) Gaussian 03, Revision D.01: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel,
H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A.,
Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.;
Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.;
Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda,
R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.;
Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.;
Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.;
Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski,
V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.;
Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.;
Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith,
T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill,
P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A.
Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
ꢁ
references on our current approach, see: (c) Cances, E.; Mennucci, B.;
Tomasi, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 3032–3041. (d) Mennucci, B.; Tomasi,
ꢁ
J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 5151–5158. (e) Mennucci, B.; Cances, E.;
Tomasi, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 10506–10517. (f) Tomasi, J.;
ꢁ
Mennucci, B.; Cances, E. THEOCHEM 1999, 464, 211–226.
(49) Lide, D. R. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 88th ed.; CRC Press:
Boca Raton, 2007.
(50) Kandil, M. E.; Marsh, K. N.; Goodwin, A. R. H. J. Chem. Eng. Data
2008, 53, 1056–1065.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 76, No. 4, 2011 1043