Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
Table 1: Optimization of reaction conditions.[a]
Entry
Variation of the standard conditions
Yield [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
none
4 instead of 3
5 instead of 3
6 instead of 3
82 (82)
<5
<5
<5
52
7 instead of 3
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
K2CO3 instead of KOtBu
DBU instead of KOtBu
Et3N instead of KOtBu
DMSO instead of DMF
1,4-dioxane instead of DMF
toluene instead of DMF
808C instead of 1008C
6 h instead of 12 h
10 mol% of 3 instead of 20 mol%
73
78
29
72
41
<5
38
75
71
[a] Standard conditions: 1a (0.25 mmol), 3 (0.05 mmol), KOtBu
(0.05 mmol), DMF (2.0 mL), 4 ꢀ M.S. (50 mg), 1008C, 12 h. [b] The
yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis (CDCl3) of the crude
reaction mixture using CH2Br2 as the internal standard. Yield of isolated
product given within parentheses. DMF=N,N-dimethylformamide,
DMSO=dimethylsulfoxide, Mes=2,4,6-trimethylphenyl, M.S.=molec-
ular sieves.
Scheme 2. Scope with respect to the NHC-catalyzed umpolung of
imines for the synthesis of indoles. General conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol),
3 (0.1 mmol), KOtBu (0.1 mmol), DMF (4.0 mL), 4 ꢀ MS (100 mg),
1008C, 12 h. Yields of the isolated products are given. [a] Reaction run
for 36 h. [b] Run for 48 h. [c] Reaction run on 0.25 mmol scale.
[d] Structure confirmed by X-ray analysis.
reaction conditions (Table 1). Gratifyingly, treatment of 1a
with a carbene generated from the triazolium salt 3, using
KOtBu as the base in DMF, afforded the 2-aryl indole 3-acetic
acid derivative 2a in 82% yield (entry 1).[18] The indole 2a
was likely formed by the umpolung of 1a using NHC, and
subsequent conjugate addition. Compared to the NHC
generated from 3, other carbenes generated from the
precursors 4–6 are less effective (entries 2–4), and the carbene
generated from 7 furnished 2a in 52% yield (entry 5). The
screening of bases revealed that K2CO3 resulted in 73% of 2a
and DBU produced 78% of 2a, whereas Et3N was not
efficient for this transformation (entries 6–8). The reaction
afforded 72% of 2a when carried out in DMSO (entry 9), and
the performed reactions in 1,4-dioxane and toluene led to
inferior results (entries 10 and 11). The reaction temperature
of 1008C and stirring for 12 hours was needed for good
conversion into 2a (entries 12 and 13). Moreover, reducing
the amount of 3 resulted in a lower yield of 2a (entry 14).
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we then
examined the substrate scope of this annulation reaction
which proceeds by the umpolung of imines (Scheme 2). A
series of aldimines synthesized by the condensation of
aromatic amines with the aromatic aldehydes having elec-
tron-releasing, electron-neutral, and moderately electron-
poor groups at the 4-position of the ring are well tolerated in
the cyclization reaction to furnish the functionalized indoles
in 75–95% yields (2a–g). Disappointingly, imines formed
from aldehydes having electron-withdrawing groups, such as
CN, at the 4-position furnished a reduced yield of the indole
product (2h). Moreover, substrates having 2-substitution and
3-substitution, as well as disubstitution on the aryl ring
attached to the imine carbon center underwent smooth
umpolung using NHCs, thus leading to the formation of the
desired product in good yields (2i–m). Additionally, various
heterocyclic-aldehyde-derived aldimines furnished the
desired 2-heteroaryl indole derivatives in good yields (2n–
r). Interestingly, the a,b-unsaturated aldimine 1s afforded the
expected indole 2s in 42% yield. Besides, sterically different
alkoxycarbonyl groups at the Michael acceptor moiety were
tolerated, and in all cases the target product was formed in
good yield (2t–v). Furthermore, this reaction is not limited to
a,b-unsaturated esters as the Michael acceptor, but instead
a,b-unsaturated ketones can also be used as the Michael
acceptors, thus providing the indole functionalized ketones in
high yields (2w–x). In the case of indole derivative 2w, the
structure was confirmed using single-crystal X-ray analysis.[19]
Finally, a series of aldimines with electron-releasing and
2
ꢀ 2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!