Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 4
DOI: 10.1039/C6CC06399C
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
Roskelley, C. M. Overall, A. Minchinton, F. Pacchiano, F.
Carta, A. Scozzafava, N. Touisni, J. Y. Winum, C. T. Supuran
and S. Dedhar, Cancer Res., 2011, 71, 3364.
namely compound 4f, in complex with its target enzyme (see ESI for
experimental details). Interestingly, analysis of the structure of the
hCA II/4f adduct showed that the bulky substituent of the
benzoxaborole ring has a great effect in influencing the interaction
of the inhibitor with the enzyme active site. Indeed, in this case only
one binding mode is observed (Fig. 3A and S4), which is completely
different from binding mode A of compound 1 (Fig. 3B) and rather
similar to binding mode B (Fig. 3C), even if some differences in the
orientation of the benzoxaborole ring can be observed also in this
case.
3. J. Y. Winum, A. Innocenti, A. Scozzafava, J. L. Montero and
C. T. Supuran, Biorg. Med. Chem., 2009, 17, 3649.
4. A. Innocenti, J. Y. Winum, R. A. Hall, F. A. Muhlschlegel, A.
Scozzafava and C. T. Supuran, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
2009, 19, 2642.
5. M. Lei, H. Feng, C. Wang, H. Li, J. Shi, J. Wang, Z. Liu, S.
Chen, S. Hu and Y. Zhu, Biorg. Med. Chem., 2016, 24, 2576.
6. J. Adams and M. Kauffman, Cancer Invest., 2004, 22, 304.
7. T. Pekol, J. S. Daniels, J. Labutti, I. Parsons, D. Nix, E.
Baronas, F. Hsieh, L. S. Gan and G. Miwa, Drug metabolism
and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2005, 33
771.
,
8. V. Ciaravino, J. Plattner and S. Chanda, Environ. Mol.
Mutagen., 2013, 54, 338.
9. R. R. Haynes and H. R. Snyder, J. Org. Chem., 1964, 29
3229.
,
10. A. Adamczyk-Wozniak, K. M. Borys and A. Sporzynski,
Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 5224.
11. S. J. Baker, Y.-K. Zhang, T. Akama, A. Lau, H. Zhou, V.
Hernandez, W. Mao, M. R. K. Alley, V. Sanders and J. J.
Plattner, J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49, 4447.
12. F. L. Rock, W. Mao, A. Yaremchuk, M. Tukalo, T. Crepin, H.
Zhou, Y. K. Zhang, V. Hernandez, T. Akama, S. J. Baker, J. J.
Plattner, L. Shapiro, S. A. Martinis, S. J. Benkovic, S. Cusack
and M. R. Alley, Science, 2007, 316, 1759.
Fig. 3 (A) σA-weighted |2Fo-Fc| map (contoured at 1.0 σ) relative to the inhibitor
molecule in the hCA II/4f adduct. (B) Structural superposition of the hCA II/4f
adduct with hCA II/1
the hCA II/4f adduct with hCA II/
adduct in binding mode A. (C) Structural superposition of
adduct in binding mode B
1
.
13. A. Adamczyk-Woźniak, M. K. Cyrański, A. Żubrowska and A.
Sporzyński, J. Organomet. Chem., 2009, 694, 3533.
It is worth noting that the inhibitor 4f cannot assume the
binding mode A when it interacts with hCA II active site, since
in such case the bulky tail in position 6 would clash with the
14. W. J. Lennarz and H. R. Snyder, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1960, 82
2172.
,
hydrophobic pocket defined by residues Phe131, Leu141, 15. T. Akama, C. Dong, C. Virtucio, D. Sullivan, Y. Zhou, Y. K.
Val121 and Val143. The stabilization of only one binding mode
and the formation of a higher number of polar and van der
Waals interactions with enzyme active site (see Fig. S4) can be
considered as the main factors responsible with the improved
inhibition properties against hCA II of compound 4f with
respect to 1.
In conclusion, altogether data here reported provide evidence
that benzoxaboroles can be efficiently used as a new class of
Zhang, F. Rock, Y. Freund, L. Liu, W. Bu, A. Wu, X. Q. Fan
and K. Jarnagin, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2013, 347, 615.
16. F. Zhengyan, H. Jiangpeng, T. Aiping, X. Yongmei and W.
Yuquan, Synthesis, 2013, 45, 2843.
17. C. T. Supuran, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2008, 7, 168.
18. D. Neri and C. T. Supuran, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 2011, 10
767.
,
19. A. Di Fiore, A. Vergara, M. Caterino, V. Alterio, S. M. Monti,
J. Ombouma, P. Dumy, D. Vullo, C. T. Supuran, J. Y. Winum
and G. De Simone, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 11519.
20. G. N. Murshudov, P. Skubak, A. A. Lebedev, N. S. Pannu, R.
A. Steiner, R. A. Nicholls, M. D. Winn, F. Long and A. A.
Vagin, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 2011, 67, 355.
21. M. D. Winn, C. C. Ballard, K. D. Cowtan, E. J. Dodson, P.
Emsley, P. R. Evans, R. M. Keegan, E. B. Krissinel, A. G.
Leslie, A. McCoy, S. J. McNicholas, G. N. Murshudov, N. S.
Pannu, E. A. Potterton, H. R. Powell, R. J. Read, A. Vagin
and K. S. Wilson, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 2011,
67, 235.
CAIs, presenting interesting inhibition properties and
a
completely new binding mode to the CA active site. Moreover,
the substitution pattern at the benzoxaborole ring can be used
to finely modulate the affinity and the binding mode toward
the different CA isoforms. Finally, our data also suggest that
the high reactivity of benzoxaborole 1 towards His residues
may be useful to map the exposition of such amino acids in
other poorly investigated proteins.
This work was supported by a grants from CNR-DSB Progetto
Bandiera "InterOmics”, and from the Ligue contre le Cancer
(comité des Pyrénées-Orientales) and by the LabEx CheMISyst
(ANR-10-LABX-05-01).
22. A. E. Eriksson, T. A. Jones and A. Liljas, Proteins, 1988, 4,
274.
23. R. T. Jacobs, J. J. Plattner, B. Nare, S. A. Wring, D. Chen, Y.
Freund, E. G. Gaukel, M. D. Orr, J. B. Perales, M. Jenks, R. A.
Noe, J. M. Sligar, Y. K. Zhang, C. J. Bacchi, N. Yarlett and R.
Notes and references
1. V. Alterio, A. Di Fiore, K. D'Ambrosio, C. T. Supuran and G.
De Simone, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 4421.
2. Y. Lou, P. C. McDonald, A. Oloumi, S. Chia, C. Ostlund, A.
Ahmadi, A. Kyle, U. Auf dem Keller, S. Leung, D. Huntsman,
B. Clarke, B. W. Sutherland, D. Waterhouse, M. Bally, C.
Don, Future Med. Chem., 2011, 3, 1259.
24. W. W. Bachovchin, W. Y. Wong, S. Farr-Jones, A. B. Shenvi
and C. A. Kettner, Biochemistry, 1988, 27, 7689.
25.J. W. Tomsho, A. Pal, D. G. Hall and S. J. Benkovic, ACS Med.
Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 48.
4 | J. Name., 2012, 00, 1-4
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins