86
A.M. Santana et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 14 (2011) 83–86
(c) A.V. Khripun, V.Y. Kukushkin, G.I. Koldobskii, M. Haukka, Inorg. Chem.
Commun. 10 (2007) 250–254;
(d) A.C. Moro, F.W. Watanabe, S.R. Ananias, A.E. Mauro, A.V.G. Netto, A.P.R. Lima,
J.G. Ferreira, R.H.A. Santos, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 9 (2006) 493–496.
[3] G.R. Desiraju, T.R. Steiner, The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and
Biology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.
(C4⋅⋅⋅Cg(1) 3.448(6) Å, H4⋅⋅⋅Cg(1) 3.04 Å, C4–H4⋅⋅⋅Cg(1) 108.4°,
symmetry code ½−x,−½+y, ½−z; C11⋅⋅⋅Cg(1) 3.652(6) Å, H11⋅⋅⋅Cg
(1) 3.11 Å, C11–H11⋅⋅⋅Cg(1) 108.4°, symmetry code 3/2−x, ½+y,
½−z). Many authors have considered the existence of C–H⋅⋅⋅π(metal
chelate ring) in structures whose H⋅⋅⋅Cg distances are b3.0 Å [5].
However, according to DFT calculations reported by Zaric et al. [18],
the interaction energy is greater than 1.5 kcal/mol for the range of
2.4–2.9 Å, while it is greater than 1 kcal/mol to H⋅⋅⋅Cg distances up to
3.4 Å, indicating that attractive interaction is expected even at the
H⋅⋅⋅Cg distances longer than 3.0 Å. Therefore, the intermolecular
C–H⋅⋅⋅π (Pd chelate ring) in 1 may be thought to be a structural
evidence for the metalloaromaticity of the cyclopalladated ring.
As can be observed in the crystal packing of 2 (Fig. 4), each
molecule of [Pd(C2,N-bzan)(μ-Pz)]2 (2) is assembled by C–H⋅⋅⋅π
interactions involving the C4b-H4b donor group and the phenyl ring
Cg(3a) (the ring centroid defined by C8a⋅⋅⋅C13a atoms; C4b⋅⋅⋅Cg(3a)
3.629(1) Å, H4b⋅⋅⋅Cg(3a) 2.84 Å, C4b–H4b⋅⋅⋅Cg(3a) 142°, symmetry
code 3/2−x, ½+y, ½−z). On the other hand, the C11a–H11a moiety
interacts with the pyrazolate aromatic ring Cg(4b) (defined by
N1b⋅⋅⋅C16b atoms: C11a⋅⋅⋅Cg(4b) 3.567(9) Å, H11a⋅⋅⋅Cg(4b) 2.79 Å,
C11a–H11a⋅⋅⋅Cg(4b) 141°, symmetry code 3/2−x, ½+y, ½−z).
In conclusion, this study showed that the cooperative effect of
C–H⋅⋅⋅π interactions plays a pivotal role for directing self-assembly
of organopalladated molecules 1 and 2 during the crystallization. At
this point, it seems important to point out that the manifestation of
the C–H⋅⋅⋅π(metal chelate ring) interactions in these complexes
appears to be sensitive to the nature of the central core. Systematic
solid state studies on C–H⋅⋅⋅π hydrogen bonds in other cyclopalla-
dated compounds are currently underway in order to investigate
the ability of cyclopalladated chelate ring to act as π acceptor
towards CH acids and their potential utility in crystal engineering.
[4] M. Nishio, M. Hirota, Y. Umezawa, The CH⋅⋅⋅π Interaction, Evidence, Nature and
Consequences, Wiley-VCH, New York, 1998.
[5] (a) R. Carballo, B. Covelo, N. Fernández-Hermida, A.B. Lago, E.M. Vázquez-López,
J. Mol. Struct. 936 (2009) 87–91;
(b) A. Castineiras, A.G. Sicilia-Zafra, J.M. González-Pérez, D. Choquesillo-Lazarte,
J. Niclós-Gutiérrez, Inorg. Chem. 41 (2002) 6956–6958;
(c) Z.D. Tomić, V.M. Leovac, S.V. Pokorni, D. Zobel, S.D. Zaric, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
(2003) 1222–1226;
(d) Z.D. Tomić, S.B. Novaković, S.D. Zarić, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2004) 2215–2218.
[6] H. Masui, Coord. Chem. Rev. 219 (2001) 957–992.
[7] E.T. de Almeida, A.E. Mauro, A.M. Santana, S.R. Ananias, A.V.G. Netto, J.G. Ferreira,
R.H.A. Santos, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 10 (2007) 1394–1398.
[8] (a) A.E. Mauro, R.H.A. Santos, M.T.P. Gambardella, R.H.P. Francisco, Polyhedron 6
(1987) 1273–1277;
(b) A.V.G. Netto, R.C.G. Frem, A.E. Mauro, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 374 (2002) 255–260;
(c) A.V.G. Netto, R.C.G. Frem, A.E. Mauro, R.H.A. Santos, J.R. Zoia, Trans. Metal
Chem. 27 (2002) 279–283;
(d) K. Tomita, A.C.F. Caíres, V.A.D. Neto, A.E. Mauro, Acta Cryst. C 50 (1994) 1872–1873;
(e) A.E. Mauro, S.H. Pulcinelli, R.H.A. Santos, M.T.P. Gambardella, Polyhedron 11
(1992) 799–803;
(f) J. Zukerman Schpector, E.E. Castellano, A.E. Mauro, Acta Cryst. C 42 (1986)
302–303.
[9] A.M. Santana, A.E. Mauro, E.T. de Almeida, A.V.G. Netto, S.I. Klein, R.H.A. Santos, J.R.
Zóia, J. Coord. Chem. 53 (2001) 163–172.
[10] S. Trofimenko, Inorg. Chem. 10 (1971) 1372–1376.
[11] E.C. Alyea, S.A. Dias, F. Bonati, Trans. Metal Chem. 6 (1981) 24–27.
[12] Complex 2 was synthesized by the dropwise addition of a solution containing
0.025 g (0.37 mmol) of pyrazole and 0.5 mL (3.6 mmol) of N, N, N-triethylamine
to an acetone suspension containing 0.1000 g (0.15 mmol) of [Pd(bzan)(μ-N3)]2.
The resulting solution was stirred for 1 h, the solvent was removed under reduced
pressure and the yellow solid was washed with pentane and dried in vacuum.
Yield: 95%. C32H26N6Pd2 (707.44): calcd. C 54.32, H 3.71, N 11.88; found C 54.69, H
3.80, N 11.62.
[13] Crystal Date were collected on a Enraf–Nonius CAD4 difractometer at room
temperature using KαMo radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). The structures were solved
by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least squares on F2 using SHELXS-97
software. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. The structural
analysis was performed by PLATON program. Crystallographic data for 1:
monoclinic, space group P21/n, a=10.5695(6) Å b=10.1215(6) Å, c=11.9116
(7) Å, Z=2, α=γ=90° β=103.462(5)° V=1239.3(1) Å3, Dc =1.761 g/cm3,
μ=1.483 mm−1, crystal dimension: 0.15 · 0.10 · 0.10 mm, of 3781 reflections
collected, 3606 were independent [Rint =0.046]. The R values are R1 =0.041, and
wR2 =0.119 [IN2σ(I)] and GOF=0.97, max/min residual electron density: 0.138/
−0.993 e/Å3. For 2: monoclinic, space group P21/n, a=12.234(1) Å, b=11.7350
(7) Å, c=20.588(2) Å, Z=4, α=γ=90° β=100.636(8)° V=2905.0(4) Å3,
Dc =1.617 g/cm3, μ=1.27 mm−1, crystal dimension 0.10 · 0.10 · 0.05 mm, of
8880 reflections collected, 8444 were independent [Rint =0.050]. The R values are
R1 =0.050 and wR2 =0.156 [IN2σ(I)] and GOF=0.93; max/min residual electron
density: 0.572/−0.669 e/Å3. Crystallographic data have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center, Summary of Data CCDC Nos.
737228/737229.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge CNPq, FAPESP and CAPES for
financial support.
Appendix A
Additional materials, consisting of atomic coordinates and equivalent
isotropic displacement parameters for non-hydrogen atoms, H-atom
coordinates and isotropic displacement parameters, interatomic bond
lengths and bond angles have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre, CCDC, no. 737228 (complex 1), and 737229
(complex 2). Copies free of charge of this information may be obtained
free of charge from de Director, CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ,
[14] NMR data (ppm) given as δ (multiplicity, J, [integration], assignment): 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3): 8.14 (s, [1H], HC=Nbzan), 8.11 (s, [1H], HC=Nbzan), 7.40 (d, 2 Hz,
[2H], H5Pz), 7.24–7.05 (m, [18H], CHbzan), 6.55 (d, 2 Hz, [2H], H3Pz), 5.83 ppm (t, 2 Hz,
[2H], H4Pz). 13C{1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): 175.6 (HC=Nbzan), 148.9 (Cbzan–Pd),
138.4 (C5Pz), 137.5 (C3Pz), 135.4–122.5 (Carom), 104.4 ppm (C4Pz).
[15] L. Pauling, The Nature of Chemical Bond, Cornell University Press, NY, 1960.
[16] A.M. Santana, A.V.G. Netto, E.T. de Almeida, A.E. Mauro, J. Souza Jr., R.H.A. Santos, Z.
Kristallogr, NCS 217 (2002) 147–148.
References
[17] (a) J. Chakraborty, M.K. Saha, P. Banerjee, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 10 (2007) 671–676;
(b) H.-P. Huang, S.-H. Li, S.-Y. Yu, Y.-Z. Li, Q. Jiao, Y.-J. Pan, Inorg. Chem. Commun.
8 (2005) 656–660;
[1] (a) C.B. Aakeroy, N.R. Champness, C. Janiak, CrystEngComm 12 (2010) 22–43;
(b) D. Braga, L. Brammer, N.R. Champness, CrystEngComm 7 (2007) 1–19;
(c) X. Lin, J. Jia, P. Hubberstey, M. Schroder, N.R. Champness, CrystEngComm 9
(2007) 438–448.
(c) A. Boixassa, J. Pons, X. Solans, M. Font-Bardia, J. Ros, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 6
(2003) 922–925.
[2] (a) G.R. Desiraju, Acc. Chem. Res. 35 (2002) 565–573;
(b) T. Steiner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41 (2002) 48–76;
[18] V.B. Medakovic, M.K. Milcic, G.A. Bogdanovic, S.D. Zaric, J. Inorg. Biochem. 98
(2004) 1867–1873.