Dehydrogenation of Perfluoroalkyl Ketones
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
CAREER Award (CHE-0847262). The authors especially acknow-
ledge Dr. James Bobbitt for helpful discussions, troubleshooting
assistance, and aid in salt preparation. Dr. You-Jun Fu is thanked
for his assistance in obtaining the HRMS of novel compounds. The
authors also acknowledge Owen Insel, Mike Mercadante, Timothy
Monos, and Rebecca Wiles of the University of Connecticut for
We have described the first direct dehydrogenation of
simple ketones using an oxoammonium salt. The reaction
can be conducted under mild conditions and gives good
yields of the corresponding α,β-unsaturated products. While
specific to perfluoroalkyl ketones, an array of β-substituents
is tolerated. The proposed mechanism involves a two-step
process invoking α-alkylation followed by an E2-like elimi- useful discussion/technical assistance.
nation. Although this study was focused on perfluoroalkyl
[1] a) M. A. Mercadante, C. B. Kelly, J. M. Bobbitt, L. J. Tilley,
ketones, extension of this reaction to other substrates bear-
ing electron-withdrawing groups may be possible. Further
studies of this and other methods for oxoammonium salt-
mediated dehydrogenation are currently underway.
N. E. Leadbeater, Nat. Protoc. 2013, 8, 666–676; b) C. B. Kelly,
Synlett 2013, 24, 527–528; c) J. M. Bobbitt, C. Bruckner, N.
Merbouh, Org. React. 2010, 74, 103–424; d) J. M. Bobbitt, N.
Merbouh, Org. Synth. 2005, 82, 80–86.
[2] a) J. M. Bobbitt, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 9367–9374; b) J. Qui,
P. P. Pradhan, N. B. Blanck, J. M. Bobbitt, W. F. Bailey, Org.
Lett. 2012, 14, 350–353; c) N. Merbouh, J. M. Bobbitt, C.
Bruckner, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 5116–5119.
[3] N. A. Eddy, C. B. Kelly, M. A. Mercadante, N. E. Leadbeater,
G. Fenteany, Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 498–501.
Experimental Section
[4] H. Richter, O. Mancheño García, Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6066–
6069.
[5] H. Richter, R. Rohlmann, O. Mancheño García, Chem. Eur. J.
2011, 17, 11622–11627.
Synthesis of (E)-1,1,1-Trifluoro-4-phenylbut-3-en-2-one (3a) as a
Representative Procedure for Dehydrogenation: To a 250 mL round-
bottomed flask equipped with stir bar was added trifluoromethyl
ketone 2a (1.42 g, 7 mmol, 1 equiv.), 2,6-lutidine (1.65 g,
15.4 mmol, 2.2 equiv.), and CH2Cl2 (70.0 mL). The reaction mix-
ture was stirred for 10 min, and salt 1 (5.46 g, 18.2 mmol,
2.6 equiv.) was then added to the flask. The flask was equipped
with a reflux condenser, and the contents were stirred for 24 h at
reflux. Once the reaction was judged complete (GC–MS analysis),
the solvent was removed in vacuo to yield a thick red residue. An-
hydrous diethyl ether (ca. 30 mL) was added to the flask (causing
precipitation of the spent oxidant 1a), and the mixture was allowed
to stir for 10 min. Any large pieces of 1a were crushed into fine
particles to release any trapped product. The solution was filtered
through a fritted funnel to isolate spent oxidant 1a. The solid was
washed thoroughly with anhydrous diethyl ether. The resulting fil-
trate was dry-packed on silica (using 1.5–2 weight equivalents rela-
tive to the ketone). The dry-packed material was loaded on to a
pad of silica gel (3.5 weight equivalents relative to the ketone) and
rinsed with approximately 80–100 mL of hexane/EtOAc (95:5). The
eluting solvent was removed in vacuo by rotary evaporation in a
room-temperature water bath to afford the pure α,β-unsaturated
TFMK product (0.9086 g, 65%) as a clear yellow oil. 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.02 (dd, J = 15.89, 0.73 Hz, 1 H) 7.41–
7.57 (m, 3 H) 7.60–7.70 (m, 2 H) 7.97 (d, J = 15.89 Hz, 1 H) ppm.
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 116.68 (q, JC,F = 291.20 Hz,
CF3) 116.90 (CH) 129.50 (C) 129.51 (CH) 132.59 (CH) 133.60
(CH) 150.41 (CH) 180.26 (q, JC,C-F = 35.90 Hz, 1 C) ppm. 19F
NMR (377 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –80.67 ppm. GC–MS (EI): m/z (%)
= 200 (56) [M]+, 199 (12), 132 (10), 131 (100), 103 (81), 102 (13),
77 (42), 69 (6), 51 (16). HRMS (ESI+): calcd. for C10H7F3O [M +
H]+ 201.0527; found 201.0548.
[6] a) P. P. Pradhan, J. M. Bobbitt, W. F. Bailey, Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 5485–5487; b) T. Takata, Y. Tsujino, S. Nakanishi, K. Naka-
mura, E. Yoshida, T. Endo, Chem. Lett. 1999, 937–938.
[7] a) M. Shibuya, M. Tomizawa, Y. J. Iwabuchi, J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 4750–4752; b) M. Shibuya, M. Tomizawa, Y. Iwabu-
chi, Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4715–4718; c) J.-M. Vatèle, Synlett
2008, 1785–1788; d) J.-M. Vatèle, Synlett 2009, 2143–2145; e)
J.-M. Vatèle, Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 904–912.
[8] M. Hayashi, M. Shibuya, Y. Iwabuchi, Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
154–157.
[9] H. Richter, O. Mancheño García, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010,
4460–4467.
[10] C. B. Kelly, M. A. Mercadante, T. A. Hamlin, M. H. Fletcher,
N. E. Leadbeater, J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 8131–8141.
[11] Mancheño García and co-workers recently reported an oxoam-
monium salt mediated C–C bond-forming reaction from benz-
ylic C(sp3)–H bonds adjacent to an oxygen or nitrogen atom
by dehydrogenative coupling with enolizable carbonyls, see
ref.[9] To the best of our knowledge, the only known dehydro-
genative oxidation by an oxoammonium species was reported
by us, see ref.[3]
[12] D. M. Rudzinski, C. B. Kelly, N. E. Leadbeater, Chem. Com-
mun. 2012, 48, 9610–9612.
[13] During our studies we noted that the addition of water to the
reaction mixture (0.2 mL) greatly accelerated the rate of the
reaction, but complicated the isolation. Additionally, rigor-
ously dried crystalline oxoammonium salt (see ref.[3] for a dry-
ing protocol) caused the reaction to proceed at a much slower
rate, which indicated that the low levels of water found in the
powdered form did assist in the reaction.
[14] a) V. A. Golubev, R. V. Miklyush, Zh. Org. Khim. 1972, 8,
1376–1377; b) Y. Liu, T. Ren, Q. Guo, Chin. J. Chem. 1996, 14,
252–258.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
[15] J. Iskra, D. Bonnet-Delpon, J.-P. Bégué, J. Fluorine Chem. 2005,
cle): Experimental details, characterization data for the products,
126, 549–554.
1
and copies of the H NMR, 13C NMR, and 19F NMR spectra for
Received: March 14, 2013
all intermediates and products.
Published Online: May 7, 2013
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 3658–3661
© 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
www.eurjoc.org
3661