J.-R. Li et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 14 (2011) 265–267
267
Table 2
Distances (d/Å) and angles (°) for the π–π interactions in 1 and 2.a
Compound, ring(1)···ring(2)
d[Cg(1)···Cg(2)]b
αc
βd
γe
d[Cg(1)···P(2)]f
d[Cg(2)···P(1)]g
1, C(7)–C(12)···N1, C(19)–C(23)
3.66
3.60
3.89
12.9
13.2
0
23.4
19.7
25.9
27.7
22.7
25.9
3.36
3.32
3.50
3.24
3.39
3.50
2, C(7)–C(12)···N1, C(19)–C(23)
2, C(19)–C(23)···N1, C(19)i–C(23)i···N1i; i: 2−x, 1−y, 1−z
a
For a graphical depiction of distances and angles in the assessment of π-π interactions, see Scheme 2.
Centroid–centroid distance.
Dihedral angle between the ring planes.
Angle between the centroid vector Cg(1)···Cg(2) and the normal to the plane 2.
Angle vector Cg(1)···Cg(2)(between the centroid ) and the normal to the plane 1.
Perpendicular distance of Cg(1) on ring plane 2.
b
c
d
e
f
g
Perpendicular distance of Cg(2) on ring plane 1.
In this work, we have shown that microwave-assisted synthesis is a
fast and efficient route to the preparation of In(SPh)3 precursor, and the
precursor can further react with bipy and dpp giving rise to two new
compounds 1 and 2. The two compounds feature neutral In(SPh)3 unit
bridged by dipyidyl ligands to form one-dimensional polymeric
structures. Their thermal property has been investigated.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (Nos. 20771102, 20873149 and 21001104).
Scheme 2. Graphical presentation of the parameters used in Table 2 for the description
of π–π stacking.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
complex. The polymeric structures containing bifunctional ligands have
not yet been described [18–20].
CCDC Nos. 794992 and 794991 contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for compounds 1 and 2, respectively. The data
12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (+44) 1223-336-033; or
PXRD patterns, and IR spectra are available as electronic supplementary
The purity of the as-synthesized compounds 1 and 2 were further
confirmed by the consistence of their powder X-ray diffraction patterns
(PXRD) and the simulated PXRD patterns from respective single-crystal
X-ray structures (Fig. S5). The thermal stabilities of the precursor In(SPh)3
and compounds 1–2 were examined by thermogravimetric analyses
(TGA) in a N2 atmosphere from ~25 to 450 °C in NETZSCH STA 449 F3 unit
at a heating rate of 5 °C/min with ~8 mg powder samples. As shown in
Fig. 2, the In(SPh)3 is stable up to 120 °C, and then loses weight in two
steps between 120 °C and 240 °C. The combined weight loss of two steps
is 65.7%. The TG processes of 1 and 2 are very similar and reveal one step
weight loss in the range of 220 °C–400 °C. The weight losses of 1 and 2
were 70.1% and 72.8%, respectively. The weigh losses in the TG of all the
three compounds can be ascribed to the decompositions of compounds,
leaving the inorganic In2S3 as post-TGA residue, which was confirmed by
the powder X-ray diffraction study (Fig S6, JCPDS No. 6504–59 for cubic
In2S3).
References
[1] Q.C. Zhang, X.H. Bu, J. Zhang, T. Wu, P.Y. Feng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129 (2007)
8412–8413.
[2] R. Ahlrichs, A. Eichhofer, D. Fenske, K. May, H. Sommer, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46
(2007) 8254–8257.
[3] J.T. Sampanthar, J.J. Vittal, Dalton Trans. (1999) 1993–1997.
[4] L. Chen, Y.B. Chen, L.M. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 16334–16335.
[5] T.H. Larsen, M. Sigman, A. Ghezelbash, R.C. Doty, B.A. Korgel, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125
(2003) 5638–5639.
[6] Z.Q. Yang, A.B. Smetana, C.M. Sorensen, K.J. Klabunde, Inorg. Chem. 46 (2007)
2427–2431.
[7] R.K. Chadha, P.C. Hayes, H.E. Mabrouk, D.G. Tuck, Can. J. Chem. 65 (1987) 804–809.
[8] R. Kumar, H.E. Mabrouk, D.G. Tuck, Dalton Trans. (1988) 1045–1047.
[9] J.H. Green, R. Kumar, N. Seudeal, D.G. Tuck, Inorg. Chem. 28 (1989) 123–127.
[10] C.O. Kappe, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43 (2004) 6250–6284.
[11] A. de la Hoz, A. Diaz-Ortiz, A. Moreno, Chem. Soc. Rev. 34 (2005) 164–178.
[12] I. Bilecka, M. Niederberger, Nanoscale 2 (2010) 1358–1374.
[13] C. Chen, L.D. Sun, Z.X. Li, L.L. Li, J. Zhang, Y.W. Zhang, C.H. Yan, Langmuir 26 (2010)
8797–8803.
[14] H. Bux, F.Y. Liang, Y.S. Li, J. Cravillon, M. Wiebcke, J. Caro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131
(2009) 16000–16001.
[15] E. Haque, N.A. Khan, J.H. Park, S.H. Jhung, Chem. Eur. J. 16 (2010) 1046–1052.
[16] G.G. Briand, R.J. Davidson, A. Decken, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 9914–9920.
[17] A mixture of In(SPh)3 (0.1 mmol, 44.0 mg) and 4, 4′-bipyridine (0.1 mmol,
16.0 mg), was placed in a 12 mm glass tube, and 1 mL of methanol was added. The
tube was sealed after evacuation and heated to 90 °C for 3 days. Upon slow
cooling of the solution to room temperature, colorless block crystals of 1 were
obtained in the yiled of 58.0% (35.0 mg). A procedure similar to that used for 1
was employed to prepare the crystals of compound 2 except that dpp (20.0 mg,
0.1 mmol) was used instead of bipy. Colorless block-like crystals of 2 were
obtained in the yield of 49% (31.0 mg).
[18] T.A. Annan, R. Kumar, H.E. Mabrouk, D.G. Tuck, R.K. Chadha, Polyhedron 8 (1989)
865–871.
[19] S. Suh, D.M. Hoffman, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998) 5823–5826.
[20] G.G. Briand, B.F.T. Cooper, D.B.S. MacDonald, C.D. Martin, G. Schatte, Inorg. Chem.
45 (2006) 8423–8429.
Fig 2. TGA curves of compounds In(SPh)3, (bipy) (1) and In(SPh)3(dpp) (2).