78
K. Hirakawa, H. Segawa / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 213 (2010) 73–79
New Research on DNA Damage, Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, 2008,
pp. 197–219.
[10] Y. Hiraku, K. Ito, K. Hirakawa, S. Kawanishi, Photosensitized DNA damage
and its protection via a novel mechanism, Photochem. Photobiol. 83 (2007)
205–212.
[11] D.E.J.G.J. Dolmans, D. Fukumura, R.K. Jain, Photodynamic therapy for cancer,
Nat. Rev. Cancer 3 (2003) 380–387.
[12] S. Hirohara, M. Obata, H. Alitomo, K. Sharyo, T. Ando, M. Tanihara, S. Yano,
Synthesis, photophysical properties and sugar-dependent in vitro photocy-
totoxicity of pyrrolidine-fused chlorins bearing S-glycosides, J. Photochem.
Photobiol. B: Biol. 97 (2009) 22–33.
[13] M.R. Wasielewski, Photoinduced electron transfer in supramolecular systems
for artificial photosynthesis, Chem. Rev. 92 (1992) 435–461.
[14] M.R. Wasielewski, Self-assembly strategies for integrating light harvesting
and charge separation in artificial photosynthetic systems, Acc. Chem. Res. 42
(2009) 1910–1921.
[15] H. Kurreck, M. Huber, Model reactions for photosynthesis-photoinduced charge
and energy transfer between covalently linked porphyrin and quinone units,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 34 (1995) 849–866.
[16] P. Piotrowiak, Photoinduced electron transfer in molecular systems: recent
developments, Chem. Soc. Rev. 28 (1999) 143–150.
[17] N. Aratani, A. Osuka, H.S. Cho, D. Kim, Photochemistry of covalently-linked
multi-porphyrinic systems, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 3
(2002) 25–52.
[18] S. Takagi, M. Eguchi, D.A. Tryk, H. Inoue, Porphyrin photochemistry in inor-
ganic/organic hybrid materials: clays, layered semiconductors, nanotubes, and
mesoporous materials, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev. 7 (2006)
104–126.
[19] K. Hirakawa, H. Segawa, Excitation energy transfer and photo-induced electron
transfer in axial bispyrenyl phosphorus porphyrin derivatives: factors govern-
ing the competition between energy and electron transfer processes under the
existence of intramolecular - interaction, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.
123 (1999) 67–76.
Fig. 8. Dependence of the calculated CT state energy on dielectric constant of sol-
vent.
of the pyrene moiety, which was estimated from the fluorescence
peak, and the CT energy of Py-POH (Table 4). These obtained val-
ues were larger than the reorganization energy (ꢁ) of the Marcus
theory (Table 4) [42,43], suggesting that the ELT of this system is in
the inverted region. However, the ELT of this system was enhanced
depending on the −ꢂG. The flexibility of the bridge butoxy chain
between the pyrene and porphyrin might change the ꢁ, resulting
in the enhancement of ELT depending on the −ꢂG.
[20] J. Wan, A. Ferreira, W. Xia, C.H. Chow, K. Takechi, P.V. Kamat, G. Jones
II, V.I. Vullev, Solvent dependence of the charge-transfer properties of
a
quaterthiophene–anthraquinone dyad, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 197
(2008) 364–374.
[21] A. Ikezaki, M. Nakamura, Effects of solvents on the electron configurations of the
low-spin dicyano[meso-tetrakis(2,4,6-triethylphenyl)porphyrinato]iron(III)
complex: importance of the C–H. . .N weak hydrogen bonding, Inorg. Chem.
41 (2002) 2761–2768.
[22] M.T. Albelda, P. Díaz, E. García-Espan˜a, J.C. Lima, C. Lodeiro, J.S. de Melo, A.J.
Parola, F. Pina, C. Soriano, Switching from intramolecular energy transfer to
intramolecular electron transfer by the action of pH and Zn2+ co-ordination,
Chem. Phys. Lett. 353 (2002) 63–68.
[23] Y. Pellegrin, R.J. Forster, T.E. Keyes, pH-Modulated photoinduced electron trans-
fer in a {[ruthenium-adamantyl] [-cyclodextrin-methylviologen]} inclusion
complex, Inorg. Chim. Acta 361 (2008) 2683–2691.
[24] I.B. Beralman, Handbook of Fluorescence Spectra of Aromatic Molecules, Aca-
demic Press, New York and London, 1965.
[25] K. Susumu, K. Kunimoto, H. Segawa, T. Shimidzu, Control of photophysical prop-
erties of “wheel-and-axle-type” phosphorus(V) porphyrin dimers by electronic
symmetry breaking, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 92 (1995) 39–46.
[26] K. Susumu, K. Kunimoto, H. Segawa, T. Shimidzu, Relaxation process of the sin-
glet excited state of “wheel-and-axle-type”phosphorus(V) porphyrin dimmers,
J. Phys. Chem. 99 (1995) 29–34.
In summary, this study has shown that hydrogen bonding
between the axial hydroxyl group of Py-POH and surroundings can
control the competition process between the intramolecular ENT
and ELT. Hydrogen bonding interaction showed larger contribution
to the selection of these processes rather than solvent polarity.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of the
Japanese Government.
[27] K. Susumu, H. Segawa, T. Shimidzu, Synthesis and photochemical properties
of the orthogonal porphyrin triad composed of free-base and phosphorus(V)
porphyrins, Chem. Lett. (1995) 929–930.
[28] J.N. Demas, G.A. Crosby, Measurement of photoluminescence quantum yields,
J. Phys. Chem. 75 (1971) 991–1024.
References
[29] K. Kunimoto, H. Segawa, T. Shimidzu, Selective synthesis of unsymmetrical
dialkoxyphosphorus(V) tetraphenylporphine derivatives by stepwise substi-
tution of axial position, Tetrahedron Lett. 33 (1992) 6327–6330.
[30] C.A. Marrese, C.J. Carrano, Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemistry
of (5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphinato)dichlorophosphorus(V) chloride, Inorg.
Chem. 22 (1983) 1858–1862.
[31] The solvent polarity parameter (f) is expressed by following formula:
f = 2(ε − 1)/(2ε + 1) − (n2 − 1)/(2n2 + 1) where ε and n are static dielectric con-
stant and refractive index of the solvent, respectively. The following values
were used as ε: 36.0 (acetonitrile), 12.3 (pyridine), 9.10 (dichloromethane),
7.58 (tetrahydrofuran), 2.38 (toluene), 33.1 (methanol), 23.8 (ethanol), 18.3
(2-propanol), and 17.95 (iso-butylalcohol). The following values were used as
n: 1.34 (acetonitrile), 1.51 (pyridine), 1.42(dichloromethane), 1.40 (tetrahydro-
furan), 1.50 (toluene), 1.33 (methanol), 1.36 (ethanol), 1.38 (2-propanol), and
1.40. (iso-butylalcohol).
[1] B. Albinsson, J. Mårtensson, Long-range electron and excitation energy trans-
fer in donor–bridge–acceptor systems, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem.
Rev. 9 (2008) 138–155.
[2] J. Otsuki, T. Akasaka, K. Araki, Molecular switches for electron and energy trans-
fer processes based on metal complexes, Coord. Chem. Rev. 252 (2008) 32–56.
[3] A.C. Benniston, A. Harriman, Controlling electron exchange in molecular assem-
blies, Coord. Chem. Rev. 252 (2008) 2528–2539.
[4] J.M. Lehn, Supramolecular chemistry-scope and perspectives molecules, super-
molecules, and molecular devices, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 27 (1988)
89–112.
[5] J.M. Lehn, Perspectives in supramolecular chemistry - from molecular recogni-
tion towards molecular information processing and self-organization, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 29 (1990) 1304–1319.
[6] A.P. de Silva, S. Uchiyama, T.P. Vance, B. Wannalerse, A supramolecular chem-
istry basis for molecular logic and computation, Coord. Chem. Rev. 251 (2007)
1623–1632.
[7] A.P. de Silva, H.Q.N. Gunaratne, C.P. McCoy, A molecular photoionic AND gate
based on fluorescent signalling, Nature 364 (1993) 42–44.
[8] C. Herrero, B. Lassalle-Kaiser, W. Leibl, A.W. Rutherford, A. Aukauloo, Artificial
systems related to light driven electron transfer processes in PSII, Coord. Chem.
Rev. 252 (2008) 456–468.
[9] K. Hirakawa, DNA damage through photo-induced electron transfer and photo-
sensitized generation of reactive oxygen species, in: H. Kimura, A. Suzuki (Eds.),
[32] A. Weller, Photoinduced electron transfer in solution, Z. Phys. Chem. Neue Folge
133 (1982) 93–98.
[33] The CT s−tate energy (ECT) was calculated from−the following equation: ECT
=
(E1+/2 − E1/2) − (Z1Z2/4ꢄε0εr) where E+ and E1/2 are half wave one-electron
1/2
oxidation and reduction potentials, respectively, Z1 is the charge of the electron
donor, Z2 is the charge of the electron acceptor, and ε0 is vacuum permeability.
The distance between the pyrene and porphyrin moieties (r = 8.5 Å) was esti-
mated from the ab initio MO calculation. Because the positive charge on the
P(V) porphyrin ring is neutralized by the ELT, the Z2 becomes zero and ECT can
be calculated by the simple equation: ECT = E1+/2 − E1−/2
.