fluorescence activity. In principle, milligram to gram scale
cyclization of a protein is now possible by using the NEXT-A
reaction.8
Unlike existing cyclization methods for recombinant
proteins,2,12 we can build linkages between the N-terminus
and any spatially compatible positions along a protein chain.
The NEXT-A/Cyclization will be applicable to more complicated
living systems such as peptide-fused viral proteins to construct
artificial cyclic-peptide libraries.16 Establishment of an artificial
phage display system in combination with the NEXT-A
cyclization is currently underway in our laboratory.
This work was supported by development projects of the
Industrial Technology Research Grant Program in 2009 from
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organi-
zation (NEDO) of Japan, Japan Society for the Promotion
of Science (JSPS) for the Promotion of Science Grant-in-Aid
for Young Scientists, and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Award in
Synthetic Organic Chemistry. We also thank Dr Laura Nelson
for careful reading of this manuscript.
Notes and references
Fig. 5 Identification of cyclic peptide-GFP. The protein was site-
specifically digested by enterokinase (EK) and analyzed by MS.
(A) Case where caaPhe is reacted with the SH group at the C-terminus
of the linear peptide. The peptide-fused protein should split into two
fragments after the site-specific cleavage. (B) Case where caaPhe is
reacted with the SH group on GFP. The peptide-fused protein
should remain as one fragment after the site-specific cleavage.
(C) MALDI-TOF mass spectrum of cyclic peptide-GFP observed
after the NEXT-A cyclization reaction followed by EK treatment.
The average masses of the protein (m/z) before and after the EK
cleavage were found to be 29 247 (calculated for [M + H]+: 29 252)
and 26 677 (calculated for [M + H]+: 26 665), respectively. This shift
corresponds to the mass of the digested cyclic peptide fragment; the
inset represents MS spectrum of the digested cyclic peptide fragment
[(m/z) was found to be 2606.03, calculated for [M + H]+: 2605.14].
1 E. M. Driggers, S. P. Hale, J. Lee and N. K. Terrett, Nat. Rev.
Drug Discovery, 2008, 7, 608–624.
2 C. P. Scott, E. Abel-Santos, M. Wall, D. C. Wahnon and
S. J. Benkovic, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1999, 96,
13638–13643.
3 R. E. Kleiner, C. E. Dumelin, G. C. Tiu, K. Sakurai and D. R. Liu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 11779–11791.
4 Y. Goto, A. Ohta, Y. Sako, Y. Yamagishi, H. Murakami and
H. Suga, ACS Chem. Biol., 2008, 3, 120–129.
5 M. Taki, A. Kuno, S. Matoba, Y. Kobayashi, J. Futami,
H. Murakami, H. Suga, K. Taira, T. Hasegawa and M. Sisido,
ChemBioChem, 2006, 7, 1676–1679.
6 M. Taki and M. Sisido, Biopolymers, 2007, 88, 263–271.
7 M. Taki, H. Kuroiwa and M. Sisido, ChemBioChem, 2008, 9,
719–722.
8 K. Ebisu, H. Tateno, H. Kuroiwa, K. Kawakami, M. Ikeuchi,
J. Hirabayashi, M. Sisido and M. Taki, ChemBioChem, 2009, 10,
2460–2464.
GFP molecules. It is emphasized that the intramolecular
cyclization exclusively takes precedence over the intermolecular
thioether-bond formation. To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first demonstration of chemoenzymatic intramolecular
protein cyclization, unlike using native chemical ligation
(NCL)12 or other side-chain chemical ligation techniques.13–15
In conclusion, the NEXT-A/Cyclization proceeded in a
single test tube as a one-pot three-step domino reaction to
afford N-terminal cyclic proteins or cyclic peptides via
thioether linkage. The intramolecular cyclization occurred
exclusively, instead of intermolecular thioether formation,
even though the molar concentration of the protein substrate
was moderately high.4 The NEXT-A/Cyclization proceeded
under mild conditions within a very short time, so that the
resulting cyclic peptide-fused GFP retained its native
9 M. Taki, Y. Yamazaki, Y. Suzuki and M. Sisido, Chem. Lett.,
2010, 818–819.
10 B. Hernandez, C. Carelli, Y. M. Coic, J. De Coninck and
M. Ghomi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 12796–12803.
11 R. Y. Tsien, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1998, 67, 509–544.
12 J. A. Camarero, J. Pavel and T. W. Muir, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1998, 37, 347–349.
13 J. W. Chin, H. Neumann, K. H. Wang, L. Davis and M. Garcia-
Alai, Nature, 2010, 464, 441–444.
14 B. Schierling, A. J. Noel, W. Wende, L. T. Hien, E. Volkov,
E. Kubareva, T. Oretskaya, M. Kokkinidis, A. Rompp,
B. Spengler and A. Pingoud, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
2010, 107, 1361–1366.
15 M. E. B. Smith, F. F. Schumacher, C. P. Ryan, L. M. Tedaldi,
D. Papaioannou, G. Waksman, S. Caddick and J. R. Baker, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 1960–1965.
16 C. Heinis, T. Rutherford, S. Freund and G. Winter, Nat. Chem.
Biol., 2009, 5, 502–507.
c
9118 Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 9116–9118
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011