years since they offer the advantages of relatively mild
reaction conditions and high functional group tolerance.3
Methods employing direct arylation allow the use of
simplified starting materials and offer a more atom eco-
nomical approach relative to traditional metal-catalyzed
cross-coupling reactions.4
Our group and that of Catellani have been engaged in
studying a reaction manifold involving a sequence of
domino ortho-functionalization followed by terminal
cross-coupling processes for the synthesis of diversely
substituted aromatic compounds.5 Recently, we disclosed
the first example of palladium-catalyzed synthesis of phe-
nanthridine derivatives employing N-unsubstituted or
N-silylimines and aryl iodides as coupling partners. Using
this method, a number of diversely substituted phenan-
thridine derivatives were synthesized in good to excellent
yields.6
We sought to validate the utility of our method by
applying it to the synthesis of members of the benzo-
[c]phenanthridine alkaloid family of natural products.
However, the synthesis of the requisite aryl iodide reaction
partners proved to be inefficient. We recognized that the
use of readily available aryl triflates could provide a
potential solution to this problem. Significantly, aryl tri-
flates were found to be unsuitable reaction partners in
previous studies involving norbornene mediated C-H
functionalization. Herein we report that aryl triflates can
be utilized instead of aryl halides for the rapid construction
of diversely substituted phenanthridines and outline the
formal synthesis of the natural product Nitidine and
NK109.
As a starting point we chose to study the reaction shown
in Table 1. Combinations of several palladium precursors
with phosphine ligands in acetonitrile at 90 °C gave low
conversion (entries 1-4). Cleavage of the triflate to the
phenol competed with the main reaction; organic bases
such as DABCO or DMAP were found to eliminate this
side reaction, but conversions were low (entries 5 and 6).
Reducing the amount of cesium carbonate and increasing
the amount of the imine employed proved to be effective at
increasing the yield (entry 7). With these conditions pro-
duct 3a could be obtained in 85% yield.
Wenexttestedthegeneralityof thisprotocol byapplying
it to the synthesis of diversely substituted phenanthridines
and benzo[c]phenanthridines. A wide range of aryl tri-
flates, easily generated from the corresponding commer-
cially available phenols, could be successfully employed
(Table 2).
Aryl triflates bearing chloro, methoxy, and alkyl sub-
stituents reacted smoothly with the N-silylaldimine 2a
(entries 1-4) to form the corresponding phenanthridine.
The only apparent requirement is that aryl triflate must be
ortho-substituted. On the other hand, a range of imines,
including N-silylaldimines, and unsubstituted ketimines
reacted in good to moderate yields (entries 5-13).
Finally, based on the promising results of this investiga-
tion, we decided to test its applicability to the synthesis of
more complicated structures (Scheme 1). Triflate 1a was
easily prepared in three steps from commercially available
dibromide 4. Slow addition of n-BuLi to dibromide 4 at
-78 °C generated an aryne intermediate, which underwent
(2) Recent synthetic studies aimed at benzo[c]phenanthridines, see:
(a) Korivi, R. P.; Cheng, C.-H. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 282. (b) Abe,
H.; Kobayashi, N.; Takeuchi, Y.; Harayama, T. Heterocycles 2010, 80,
873. (c) Kohno, K.; Azuma, S.; Choshi, T.; Nobuhiro, J.; Hibino, S.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 590. (d) Ramani, P.; Fontana, G. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2008, 49, 5262. (e) Sanz, R.; Fernandez, Y.; Castroviejo, M. P.;
Perez, A.; Fananas, F. J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 62. (f) Luo, Y.; Mei,
Y.; Zhang, J.; Lu, W.; Tang, J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 9131. (g) Le, T. N.;
Gang, S. G.; Cho, W.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 2768. (h) Harayama, T.;
Sato, T.; Nakano, Y.; Abe, H.; Takeuchi, Y. Heterocycles 2003, 59, 293.
(i) Watanabe, T.; Ohashi, Y.; Yoshino, R.; Komano, N.; Eguchi, M.;
Sakiko, M.; Ishikawa, T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3024. (j)
Harayama, T.; Akiyama, T.; Akamatsu, H.; Kawano, K.; Abe, H.;
Takeuchi, Y. Synthesis 2001, 444. (k) Nakanishi, T.; Suzuki, M. Org.
Lett. 1999, 1, 985. (l) Geen, G. R.; Mann, I. S.; Mullane, M. V.;
McKillop, A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 9875. (m) Sotomayor, N.;
Dominguez, E.; Lete, E. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4062. (n) Seraphin,
D.; Lynch, M. A.; Duval, O. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5731. (o)
Maestri, G.; Larraufie, M.-H.; Derat, E.; Ollivier, Fensterbank, L.;
Table 1. Optimizationa
^
Lacote, E.; Malacria, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5692.
(3) Palladium-catalyzed approaches for the synthesis of phenanthri-
dines: (a) Catellani, M.; Motti, E.; Della Ca’, N. Top. Catal. 2010, 53,
991. (b) Gerfaud, T.; Neuville, L.; Zhu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 572. (c) Bowman, W. R.; Lyon, J. E.; Pritchard, G. J. Synlett 2008,
2169. (d) Sripada, L.; Teske, J. A.; Deiters, A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008,
6, 263. (e) Della Ca’, N.; Motti, E.; Catellani, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008,
350, 2513.
yield
(%)b
Pd source
ligand
base
(4) Reviews: (a) Alberico, D.; Scott, M. E.; Lautens, M. Chem. Rev.
2007, 107, 174. (b) Campeau, L.-C.; Fagnou, K. Chem. Commun. 2006,
1253. (c) Miura, M.; Satoh, T. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 14, 55.
(d) Wolfe, J. P.; Thomas, J. S. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 625. (e) Ritleng,
V.; Sirlin, C.; Pfeffer, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1731. (f) Modern
Arylation Methods; Ackermann, L.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2009. (g)
Handbook of C-H Transformations; Dyker, G., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Wein-
heim, 2005.
(5) Reviews: (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G. ; Gericke, K. M. Domino
Reaction in Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (b) Chiusoli,
G. P.; Catellani, M.; Costa, M.; Motti, E.; Della Ca', N.; Maestri, G. Coord.
Chem. Rev. 2010, 254, 456. (c) Lautens, M.; Alberico, D.; Bressy, C.;
Fang, Y.-Q.; Mariampillai, B.; Wilhelm, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78,
351.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Pd(OAc)2
PdCl2
PPh3
PPh3
TFP
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
DMAP
48
14
e5
0
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
P(t-Bu)3
PPh3
PPh3
PPh3
0
DABCO
Cs2CO3
11
85c
a Reaction conditions: aryl triflate (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), imine (1.1
equiv), Pd source (10 mol %), Ligand (25 mol %), Base (3 equiv), and
norbornene (8.0 equiv) in MeCN (0.05 M) were heated in a sealed tube at
90 °C for 16 h. b NMR yield using mesitylene as an internal standard.
c Imine (2.0 equiv), Cs2CO3 (1.5 equiv).
(6) Candito, D. A.; Lautens, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48,
6713.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 2011
1487