The Journal of Organic Chemistry
ARTICLE
by following the decay of the visible absorption band at 580 nm) vs
[MenFc] plots.
Fresh solutions were used for every MenFc concentration. Correla-
tion coefficients were in all cases >0.992. The given rate constants are the
average of at least two independent experiments, typical errors being
<10%.
(14) Shao, J.; Geacintov, N. E.; Shafirovich, V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010,
114, 6685–6692.
(15) (a) Magri, D. C.; Workentin, M. S. Chem.—Eur. J. 2008,
14, 1698–1709. (b) Donkers, R. L.; Workentin, M. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 1688–1698. (c) Donkers, R. L.; Tse, J.; Workentin, M. S.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 135–136.
(16) (a) Donkers, R. L.; Maran, F.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Workentin,
M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7239–7248. (b) Antonello, S.;
Musumeci, M.; Wayner, D. D. M.; Maran, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 9541–9549. (c) Workentin, M. S.; Maran, F.; Wayner, D. D. M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2120–2121.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Details of the synthesis of tert-
b
butyl 4-tert-butylcumyl peroxide. NMR spectra. Time-resolved
absorption spectra. Plots of kobs vs [MenFc] for the reactions of
the 4-X-CumO• with the MenFc. Plots of log k2 vs EA (4-X-
CumO•). Computational details and data for the 4-X-CumO•-
DcMFc complexes and the electron affinities of 4-X-CumO•.
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
(17) Bietti, M.; DiLabio, G. A.; Lanzalunga, O.; Salamone, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2010, 75, 5875–5881.
(18) LFP of tert-butyl 4-X-cumyl peroxides also produces the tert-
butoxyl radical (t-BuO•). This radical, however, does not interfere with
our measurements because, as mentioned above, the ET rate constants
for its reaction with the ferrocene donors are at least 2 orders of
magnitude lower than those measured for the corresponding reactions
of CumO•.17
(19) (a) Avila, D. V.; Ingold, K. U.; Di Nardo, A. A.; Zerbetto, F.;
Zgierski, M. Z.; Lusztyk, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 2711–2718.
(b) Avila, D. V.; Lusztyk, J.; Ingold, K. U. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992,
114, 6576–6577.
(20) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Salamone, M.; Steenken, S. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 2266–2270.
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
*E-mail: bietti@uniroma2.it; gino.dilabio@nrc.ca; osvaldo.
(21) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Lanzalunga, O.; Steenken, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11516–11517.
(22) Frey, J. E.; Du Pont, L. E.; Puckett, J. J. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 5386–5392.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Financial support from the Ministero dell’Istruzione
dell’Universitꢀa e della Ricerca (MIUR) is gratefully acknowl-
edged. We thank Lorenzo Stella for the use of LFP equipment
and Alessandra Gentili for performing an Enhanced Resolution
ESI(þ) experiment.
(23) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652.
(24) Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789.
(25) This model was described in: DiLabio, G. A.; Pratt, D. A.;
LoFaro, A. D.; Wright, J. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 1653–1661.
(26) Cossi, M.; Rega, N.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V. J. Comput. Chem.
2003, 24, 669–681 and references cited therein.
’ REFERENCES
(27) Gaussian 03, Revision D.01: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.;
Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.;
Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam,
J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.;
Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara,
M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.;
Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian,
H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann,
R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.;
Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.;
Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz,
J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.;
Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.;
Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe,
M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.;
Pople, J. A. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh PA, 2004.
(1) Jomovꢁa, K.; Kysel, O.; Madden, J. C.; Morris, H.; Enoch, S. J.;
Budzak, S.; Young, A. J.; Cronin, M. T. D.; Mazur, M.; Valko, M. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 2009, 478, 266–270.
(2) Goldstein, S.; Samuni, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 1066–1072.
(3) Fukuzumi, S.; Shimoosako, K.; Suenobu, T.; Watanabe, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9074–9082.
(4) (a) Brinck, T.; Lee, H.-N.; Jonsson, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999,
103, 7094–7104. (b) Jonsson, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 6814–6818.
(5) (a) Das, T. N.; Dhanasekaran, T.; Alfassi, Z. B.; Neta, P. J. Phys.
Chem. A 1998, 102, 280–284. (b) Alfassi, Z. B.; Khaikin, G. I.; Neta, P.
J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 265–268.
(6) Jovanovic, S. V.; Jankovic, I.; Josimovic, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 9018–9021.
(7) Litwinienko, G.; Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 222–230.
(8) Steenken, S.; Neta, P. In The Chemistry of Phenols; Rappoport, Z.,
Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2003; Chapter 16, pp 1107-1152.
(9) Itoh, S.; Kumei, H.; Nagatomo, S.; Kitagawa, T.; Fukuzumi, S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2165–2175.
(28) We have recently shown that the difference in the calculated
solvent-phase EAs between CumO• and t-BuO• (ΔEA(CumO•
-
t-BuO•)) parallels the analogous ΔE° values.17 Accordingly, by taking
into account the reduction potential of CumO• (E°CumO•/CumO- = -
0.19 V/SCE in MeCN),16a the ΔEA values obtained from Table 1 can
provide reasonable estimates of the E° values of the 4-X-CumO• radicals.
(29) Swain, C. J.; Lupton, E. C., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
4328–4337.
(10) Armstrong, D. A.; Sun, Q.; Schuler, R. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 9892–9899.
(11) (a) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Lanzalunga, O.; Lapi, A.; Raponi,
D. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1378–1385. (b) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.;
Di Fusco, M.; Lanzalunga, O.; Raponi, D. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74,
5576–5583. (c) Baciocchi, E.; Bietti, M.; Di Fusco, M.; Lanzalunga, O.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8748–8754.
(30) Using the B971 functional: Hamprecht, F. A.; Cohen, A. J.;
Tozer, D. J.; Handy, N. C. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 6264–6271 as
implemented in ref 27, along with 6-31þG(d,p) basis sets.
(31) (a) DiLabio, G. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 455, 348–353. (b)
Mackie, I. D.; DiLabio, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 10968–
10976.
(12) Galli, C.; Gentili, P.; Lanzalunga, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2008, 47, 4790–4796.
(13) (a) Blinco, J. P.; Hodgson, J. L.; Morrow, B. J.; Walker, J. R.;
Will, G. D.; Coote, M. L.; Bottle, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6763–6771.
(b) Manda, S.; Nakanishi, I.; Ohkubo, K.; Yakumaru, H.; Matsumoto,
K.; Ozawa, T.; Ikota, N.; Fukuzumi, S.; Anzai, K. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2007, 5, 3951–3955.
(32) Sinnokrot, M. O.; Sherrill, C. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 7690–7697.
1793
dx.doi.org/10.1021/jo102420p |J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 1789–1794