strain.9 Moreover, despite the fact that the competitive
[1,3]-Brook rearrangement has been used in other systems
as a dominant direct path to vinylsilane,10 formation of the
unstable oxiranyl anion 7 would render path b rather
unfavorable here. On the other hand, for the potential
stereoselectivity in [1,2]-Brook path a, we anticipated the
sterically hindered SiMe3 group might have some key
impacts on the conformation of siloxy carbanion 4, thus
providing reasonable configurational control during for-
mation of the double bond. Herein, we report the realization
of this sequential addition/[1,2]-Brook rearrangement/
epoxide-opening process.
Scheme 1
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
investigated. Additionally, despite the preparation of silyl
enol ethers from acysilanes having been reported,7 there
are only limited examples describing the synthesis of
tetrasubstituted one. We envisioned that such an addition
might initiate an efficient approach to tetrasubstituted
β-hydroxy-R-TMS silyl enol ethers 6 based on the con-
sideration of the following selectivity issues (Scheme 1).
First, for the potential two Csp3 to O silyl migration paths
of alkoxide intermediate 3, we presumed that the desired
[1,2]-Brook rearrangement8 (path a) should be energeti-
cally more favorable due to the relief of epoxide ring
entrya acylsilane (R3Si)
epoxide
solvent product yieldc
1
2
3
4
5
1a (Et3Si)
1a (Et3Si)
2a (Si = Me3Si) Et2O
6a
6a
6b
6c
6d
18%
63%
42%
23%
50%
2a (Si = Me3Si) pentane
1b (t-BuMe2Si) 2a (Si = Me3Si) pentane
1c (PhMe2Si)
1a (Et3Si)
2a (Si = Me3Si) pentane
2b (Si = Ph3Si) pentane
a Reaction conditions: acylsilane 1 (1.0 equiv), epoxide 2 (2.0 equiv),
t-BuLi (2.0 equiv), TMEDA (2.4 equiv); 0.12 M at -98 °C. b The
stereoselectivity was determined by 1H NMR spectroscopy, and the
configuration was determined by NOE experiments of 6a. c Isolated
yield after purification by silica gel column chromatography.
(4) (a) Ishii, A.; Kojima, J.; Mikami, K. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 2013. (b)
Ho, C. Y.; Ohmiya, H.; Jamison, T. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
1893. (c) Tsubouchi, A.; Enatsu, S.; Kanno, R.; Takeda, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7089.
(5) (a) Eisch, J. J.; Galle, J. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 4646. (b)
Eisch, J. J.; Galle, J. E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1988, 341, 293. (c)
Molander, G. A.; Mautner, K. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4042. (d) Marie,
J. C.; Courillon, C.; Malacria, M. Synlett 2002, 4, 553. (e) Courillon, C.;
Marie, J. C.; Malacria, M. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 9759. (f) Marie, J. C.;
Courillon, C.; Malacria, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2, 463. (g) Nagaki,
A.; Takizawa, E.; Yoshida, J. I. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 486. For reviews
on oxiranyl anions, see:(h) Satoh, T. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3303. (i)
Hodgson, D. M.; Gras, E. Synthesis 2002, 1625.
(6) For the latest review, see: (a) Patrocinio, A. F.; Moran, P. J. S. J.
Braz. Chem. Soc. 2001, 12, 7. For recent representative studies on
acylsilanes, see:(b) Li, F. Q.; Zhong, S.; Lu, G.; Chan, A. S. C. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1955. (c) Tarr, J. C.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 3870. (d) Lettan, R. B.; Galliford, C. V.; Woodward, C. C.;
Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 8805. (e) Greszler, S. N.;
Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3689. (f) Shen, Z. M.;
Dong, V. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 748. (g) Yoshikawa, T.;
Mori, S.; Shindo, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2092. (h) Greszler,
S. N.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 827. (i) Unger, R.; Weisser, F.;
Chinkov, N.; Stanger, A.; Cohen, T.; Marek, I. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1853.
(j) Sasaki, M.; Oyamada, K.; Takeda, K. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3941.
(k) Tarr, J. C.; Johnson, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3317. (l) Smith,
A. G.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1784. (m) Schmitt, D. C.;
Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 944. (n) Matsuo, J.-i.; Hattori, Y.;
Ishibashi, H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2294.
(7) (a) Reich, H. J.; Rusek, J. J.; Olson, R. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 2225. (b) Reich, H. J.; Olson, R. E.; Clark, M. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 1423. (c) Kato, M.; Mori, A.; Oshino, H.; Enda, J.; Kobayashi,
K.; Kuwajima, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1773. (d) Enda, J.;
Kuwajima, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5495.
(8) For reviews, see: (a) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77. (b)
Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065.
(9) (a) Clayden, J.; Watsona, D. W.; Chambers, M. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 3195. (b) Robertson, B. D.; Hartel, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2008, 49, 2088. (c) Baker, H. K.; Hartel, A. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 4012.
(10) For studies on 1,2- vs 1,3-silyl migration, see: (a) Reich, H. J.;
Eisenhart, E. K.; Olson, R. E.; Kelly, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
7791. (b) Taguchi, H.; Ghoroku, K.; Tadaki, M.; Tsubouchi, A.;
Takeda, T. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 8450.
To establish feasibility, the reaction of acylsilane 1a11
with epoxide 2a was examined initially. Deprotonation of
2a by t-BuLi/TMEDA complex in Et2O at -98 °C and the
following addition to 1a afforded the desired silyl enol
ether 6a, although in 18% yield, as a single Z-diastereomer
(Table 1, entry 1). To our delight, using nonpolar solvents
such as pentane then led to a much higher yield (63%, entry 2).
The alkoxide intermediate 5 showed good stability even at
room temperature for several hours, and no further 1,3-
Csp2 to O silyl migration occurred.12 The result is consistent
with Takeda’s observation that such silyl migrations are
not active in less polar solvents due to the covalent
character of the Li-O bond.13 Acylsilanes containing the
more hindered t-BuMe2Si and PhMe2Si group proved to
(11) Xin, L. H.; David, A. N.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2957.
(12) Further1,3-Csp2 to O silyl migration of 6a or 6b and the following
alkylation with alkyl halides would potentially generate various tetra-
substituted silyl enol ethers. Investigations on this transformation are
still ongoing. For recent studies on Csp2 to O silyl migration, see: (a)
Moser, W. H.; Endsley, K. E.; Colyer, J. T. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 718. (b)
Taguchi, H.; Ghoroku, K.; Tadaki, M.; Tsubouchi, A.; Takeda, T. Org.
Lett. 2001, 3, 3811. (c) Moser, W. H.; Zhang, J.; Lecher, C. S.; Frazier,
T. L.; Pink, M. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 1981. (d) Tsubouchi, A.; Itoh, M.;
Onishi, K.; Takeda, T. Synthesis 2004, 9, 1504. (e) Taguchi, H.; Takami,
K.; Tsubouchi, A.; Takeda, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 429. (f)
Devarie-Baez, N. O.; Shuhler, B. J.; Wang, H.; Xian, M. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 4655. (g) Smith, A. B., III; Kim, W. S.; Wuest, W. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7082. (h) Devarie-Baez, N. O.; Kim, W. S.;
Smith, A. B., III; Xian, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1861. (i) Smith, A. B., III;
Kim, W. S.; Tong, R. B. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 588.
(13) Tsubouchi, A.; Kira, T.; Takeda, T. Synlett 2006, 2577.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 6, 2011
1441