4e estimated that the energy of interaction between lone
pairs (LP) of both nitrogens and σ* orbital for the
Nimide-H bond was 3.21 and 4.33 kcal/mol, respectively.
These results imply that the hydrogen on sulfonimide in 4e
makes hydrogen bonding to both nitrogens in quinoline
and pyrrolidine.
The optimized structure for enamine intermediate 9 also
shows hydrogen bonding between the nitrogen in quino-
line and the hydrogen on sulfonimide, although the nitro-
gen in the pyrrolidine ring is separated from the
sulfonimide hydrogen becauseoftheformation ofenamine
(Figure 2). The NBO analysis for enamine 9 also shows the
interaction between the lone pair of quinoline nitrogen and
the σ* orbital for the Nimide-H bond. The stabilizing
energy for their hydrogen bonding was estimated to be
8.45 kcal/mol.
Figure 3. Assumed transition state for the cross-aldol reaction of
1a with acetone, using 4e.
play an important role in transition states. There are two
plausible transition states TS-S and TS-R. The reaction
with 4e proceeds more preferably through TS-S giving
(S)-2a, because TS-R, whichgives (R)-2a, isdestabilizedby
steric repulsion between the bulky trifluoromethyl groups
and methyl or the 8-quinolyl groups in enamine 9.15
In conclusion, we have developed a highly enantioselec-
tive construction of a quaternary carbon center by the
reaction of trihalometyl ketones and a ketimine with
acetone (up to 96% ee). We have identified 8-quinoline-
sulfonylated catalyst 4e to be a privileged organocatalyst
for the reaction with various trihalometyl ketones and
ketimine. Further studies are in progress to study the
potential of these catalytic systems in other processes.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the
Tatematsu Foundation. We are grateful to Zeon Co. for
a gift of CPME.
Figure 2. Optimized structure for enamine intermediate 9.
From the above considerations, the assumed transition
states for the enantioselective aldol reaction of trifluoro-
methyl ketones with acetone are shown in Figure 3. The
hydrogen bonding between the sulfonimide proton and the
8-quinolyl nitrogen atom in the organocatalysts 4e would
Supporting Information Available. Representative ex-
perimantal procedures, HPLC analyses, and NMR spec-
tra of the products. This material is available free of
(13) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.;
Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.;
Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Caricato, M.; Li, X.; Hratchian, H. P.;
Izmaylov, A. F.; Bloino, J.; Zheng, G.; Sonnenberg, J. L.; Hada, M.;
Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakaji-
ma, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Vreven, T.; Montgomery, J. A.,
Jr.; Peralta, J. E.; Ogliaro, F.; Bearpark, M.; Heyd, J. J.; Brothers, E.;
Kudin, K. N.; Staroverov, V. N.; Kobayashi, R.; Normand, J.; Ragha-
vachari, K.; Rendell, A.; Burant, J. C.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Cossi,
M.; Rega, N.; Millam, J. M.; Klene, M.; Knox, J. E.; Cross, J. B.;
Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.;
Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.;
Martin, R. L.; Morokuma, K.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Voth, G. A.; Salva-
dor, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Farkas, O.;
Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cioslowski, J.; Fox, D. J. Gaussian 09,
Revision A.02; Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2009.
(14) NBO Version 3.1; Glendening, E. D., Reed, A. E., Carpenter,
J. E., Weinhold, F. See also: (a) Reed, A. E.; Weinstock, R. B.;
Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 735. (b) Reed, A. E.; Curtiss,
L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899.
(15) It is reasonable that the phenyl group is effectively a smaller
group than the trifluoromethyl group. The order of relative sizes for
trihalomethyl and phenyl group are CCl3 > CF3 > Ph as indicated by
the following reports, see: (a) Corey, E. J.; Cheng, X.-M.; Cimprich,
K. A.; Sarshar, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 6835. (b) Ramachandran,
P. V.; Teodorovic, A. V.; Brown, H. C. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1725. (c)
Corey, E. J.; Helal, C. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 1986. (d) Tur,
ꢀ
F.; Mansilla, J.; Lillo, V. J.; Saa, J. M. Synthesis 2010, 1909. This
assumption is in good agreement with the better enantioselectivity
obtained from the reaction with trichloromethyl ketones 5 than that
with trifluoromethyl ketones 1.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 7, 2011
1665