1156
M. J. Palframan et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1154–1156
Chuang, Y.-H.; Chang, N.-C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 9685–9688; (b) Takacs, J. M.;
Bolto, S. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 2941–2944; (c) Tietze, L. F.; Rackelmann,
N.; Müller, I. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 2722–2731; (d) Itoh, T.; Miyazaki, M.;
Fukuoka, H.; Nagata, K.; Ohsawa, A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1295–1297; (e) Tietze, L.
F.; Rackelmann, N.; Sekar, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4254–4257; (f)
Ihara, M.; Yasui, K.; Taniguchi, N.; Fukumoto, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29,
4963–4966; (g) Ihara, M.; Tasui, K.; Taniguchi, N.; Fukumoto, K. J. Chem. Soc.,
Perkin Trans. 1 1990, 1469–1476; (h) Takano, S.; Hatakeyama, S.; Ogasawara, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 2519–2522.
gether with various by-products), unsaturated ester 17 gave 18 in
excellent 89% yield.
Tricycles 12 and 13 were then converted into predominantly 3-
epi-protoemetinol (epi-3) and 3-epi-3-desmethyl protoemetinol
(epi-19), respectively, by reduction of the ester groups followed
by catalytic hydrogenation of the C@C bonds (Scheme 5). In each
case, a face-selective hydrogenation using Pd/C as the catalyst
was observed to give predominantly the epi isomers. However,
investigations on the use of alternative catalysts, found that Crab-
tree’s catalyst12 afforded a moderate excess of both ( )-protoemet-
inol (3) and the ( )-desmethyl analogue 19. For example, catalytic
hydrogenation using Crabtrees’ catalyst, in dichloromethane at rt,
afforded a 1.1:1.0 ratio of 3:epi-3 (54% yield) and a 1.4:1.0 ratio
of 19:epi-19 (96% yield).
5. See for example: (a) Gandon, L. A.; Russell, A. G.; Güveli, T.; Brodwolf, A. E.;
Kariuki, B. M.; Spencer, N.; Snaith, J. S. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5198–5207; (b)
Lee, E.; Jeong, E. J.; Min, S. J.; Hong, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, S. K.; Kim, H. J.; Choi, B. G.;
Koo, K. C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2169–2171; (c) Koreeda, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.
Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3329–3332; (d) Katritzky, A. R.; Luo, Z.; Fang, Y.; Feng, D.;
Ghiviriga, I. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2000, 1375–1380; (e) Parsons, A. F.;
Pettifer, R. M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1998, 651–660; (f) Ishibasi, H.;
Inomata, M.; Ohba, M.; Ikeda, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1149–1152; (g)
Kaoudi, T.; Miranda, L. D.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3125–3127; (h) Quirante,
J.; Escolano, C.; Bosch, J.; Bonjoch, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 2141–
2142; (i) Yu, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Deschamps, J.; Flippen-Anderson, J.; Liao, X.;
Cook, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7565–7581; (j) Kuehne, M. E.; Wang, T.;
Seraphin, D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7873–7881; (k) Wang, T.; Cook, J. M. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 2057–2059; (l) Eichberg, M. J.; Dorta, R. L.; Lamottke, K.; Vollhardt,
K. P. C. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2479–2481; (m) Kuehne, M. E.; Wang, T.; Seraphin, D.
Synlett 1995, 557–558.
6. For a related 6-exo cyclisation of an indole bearing an unsaturated malonate,
see: Takayama, H.; Watanabe, F.; Kitajima, M.; Aimi, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 5307–5310.
7. Compound 5 was prepared from 6,7-dimethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline
using the following four-step procedure: (1) Boc2O, Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt (85%); (2)
sBuLi, THF, À78 °C then allyl bromide, À78 °C to rt (68%); (3) TFA, CH2Cl2, rt
then aq NaOH (88%); (4) 2,3-dibromopropene, K2CO3, Et3N, DMF, rt (67%).
8. All new compounds gave consistent spectral and high-resolution mass
spectrometry data.
9. Typical experimental procedure for the radical cyclisation: A solution of bromide 5
(0.70 g, 2.0 mmol) in THF (25 mL) was stirred at reflux while AIBN (16 mg,
0.10 mmol) was added, followed by the slow addition of a solution of Bu3SnH
(0.75 mL, 2.80 mmol) and AIBN (150 mg, 0.90 mmol) in THF (20 mL) by a
syringe pump over a period of 4 h. Following the complete addition of the
Bu3SnH solution, the reaction mixture was maintained at reflux for a further
2 h, after which the solution was cooled to rt. The reaction mixture was
concentrated in vacuo, until approximately 10 mL of solvent remained, which
was then stirred with KF/silica for 10 min. The resulting slurry was loaded onto
a short KF/silica column, and flushed with petrol then EtOAc, and the EtOAc
fraction was concentrated in vacuo to afford a yellow gum. The gum was
purified by flash silica chromatography, elution gradient 3:1 petrol/EtOAc to
EtOAc, the pure fractions were then concentrated in vacuo to afford compound
6 (0.24 g, 44%) and compound 8 (0.14 g, 26%), both as yellow gums.
10. 1,2-Dibromobut-2-ene was prepared in four-steps from crotonaldehyde. The
stereochemistry of the C@C bond was tentatively assigned as Z on the basis of a
1H NOESY experiment.
The synthesis of a de-methoxy mitragynine analogue 22 was
also explored (Scheme 6). Treatment of the vinyl bromide 20 with
tributyltin hydride afforded a mixture of products, including the
direct reduction diene 21, the desired cyclised product, octahydro-
quinolizine 22 and an unexpected pentacyclic-bridged system 23.
The pentacyclic-bridged system is proposed to occur via a 5-exo
cyclisation of the initial vinyl radical onto the indole ring, followed
by a second 5-exo cyclisation onto the a
,b-unsaturated ester.13
It has been shown that ( )-protoemetinol (3), its 3-epi-isomer
epi-3 and 3-desmethyl derivatives 19 and epi-19 can be prepared
in just five linear steps from dihydroisoquinoline 10. This repre-
sents the quickest reported approach to these compounds, which
are isolated in good to moderate yield. For example, 3-epi-3-desm-
ethyl protoemetinol (epi-19) was isolated in an excellent overall
yield of 32%. Also, because we found that resolution of ( )-bromide
11 could be achieved using chiral HPLC,14 it was possible to use
this approach to access both enantiomeric series of the alkaloids.
Acknowledgements
We thank AstraZeneca and the EPSRC for the funding.
References and notes
1. (a) Fuji, T.; Ohba, M.; Yoshifuji, S. Heterocycles 1988, 27, 1009–1033; (b)
Michael, J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1994, 17–39.
2. Tan, G. T.; Kinghorn, A. D.; Hughes, S. H.; Pezzuto, J. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266,
23529–23536.
3. (a) Takayama, H.; Ishikawa, H.; Kurihara, M.; Kitajima, M.; Aimi, N.; Ponglux,
D.; Koyama, F.; Matsumoto, K.; Moriyama, T.; Yamamoto, L. T.; Watanabe, K.;
Murayama, T.; Horie, S. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1949–1956; (b) Takayama, H.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 52, 916–928; (c) Takayama, H.; Kitajima, M.; Kogure,
N. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 1445–1464; (d) Matsumoto, K.; Takayama, H.;
Ishikawa, H.; Aimi, N.; Ponglux, D.; Watanabe, K.; Horie, S. Life Sci. 2006, 78,
2265–2271; (e) Ma, J.; Yin, W.; Zhou, H.; Cook, J. M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3491–
3494.
11. The lower yield of 12 may be explained by a competing 1,5-H transfer reaction
of the radical formed on 6-exo cyclisation. Reduction of the resulting allylic
radical could produce a terminal alkene, which is supported by the presence of
new signals between 5 and 6 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude
product.
12. Crabtree, R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 331–337.
13. For the synthesis of mitragynine 2, see: Takayama, H.; Maeda, M.;
Ohbayashi, S.; Kitajima, M.; Sakai, S-i.; Aimi, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995,
36, 9337–9340.
14. HPLC was carried out at AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, by Michael Hatton on a
Rainin prep (200 ml heads) instrument with a Merck 100 mm 20
lm Chiralpak
AS column, using IsoHex/IPA/Et3N 80/20/0.1 as the mobile phase.
4. For the synthesis of protoemetinol (3) and related compounds, and the use of
these compounds in alkaloid synthesis, see: (a) Chang, J.-K.; Chang, B.-R.;