J. Wierzejska et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 1173–1175
1175
OBn
-0.04
MTPA
OBn
O
-0.03
+0.14
OBn
N
+0.04
+0.12
+0.10
+0.13
+0.09
-0.11
-0.04
-0.01
-0.05
Boc
(S)- or (R)-16α
Figure 2. Model projection for the
DdSR value distributions in ppm (600 MHz,
CDCl3).
In conclusion, we have completed the total synthesis of
(+)-batzellaside B and its C8-epimer from a known -arabinose-
L
Figure 1. Comparison of 1H NMR spectra of 14
a and 14b.
derived tribenzyl ether in 22 steps with overall yields of 3.9%
and 5.4%, respectively. In the course of our synthetic studies the
absolute configuration of (+)-batzellaside B also has been unambig-
uously determined to be 1S,3S,4S,5R,8S by the modified Mosher
analysis of the synthetic intermediate prepared through the sepa-
rate route. The present study represents the first total synthesis of
this class of natural products as well as the first report revealing
the unspecified absolute stereochemistry. Efforts to provide a more
facile and efficient route to this class of natural products and to ex-
plore synthetic access to homologous batzellaside derivatives are
in progress.
changes in spectral shapes of the H20 and H7 with even less re-
solved multiplets. In addition, the 13C NMR chemical shifts for
14b are completely consistent with literature data of structurally
related batzellaside A,1 whereas significant differences in the cor-
responding spectral data are evident in the case of 14
observations, it is evident that 14b can be assigned as the formate
salt of (+)-batzellaside B and 14
should be its C8-epimer.10
a. From these
a
After the completion of the total synthesis, we turned next to
spectroscopic determination of the absolute stereochemistry of
the final products. Unfortunately, an attempt to determine the
Acknowledgment
absolute configurations at the C8 chiral centers of 14
a and 14b
by employing the Mosher’s method11 failed due to indistinguish-
able proton resonances. Therefore, we explored a separate route
involving the intermediacy of a structurally simpler system so as
to validate the Mosher analysis (Scheme 4). Based on these consid-
erations, 11 was allylated by following the Barbier-type protocol12
to give a mixture of low and more polar diastereomeric isomers
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Re-
search from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan.
Supplementary data
15
by silica-gel column chromatography, we subjected 15
tization with (R)- and (S)- -methoxy- -(trifluoromethyl)phenyl-
acetyl chloride (MTPA-Cl) to convert into the corresponding (S)-
and (R)-16 , respectively. Model projection performed according
to the empirical method with the
dSR (=dS ꢀ dR, ppm) value distri-
butions11b for (S)- and (R)-16
allowed precise determination of
the absolute stereochemistry, indicating the absolute configura-
tions at C8 for 15 and 15b to be R and S, respectively (Fig. 2).
Meanwhile, 15b was shown to undergo the cross metathesis with
1-heptene and subsequent hydrogenation to result in exclusive
production of 12b as evidenced by identity of the 1H NMR reso-
nances (see Supplementarydata). Consequently, the definitive con-
clusion drawn from the correlation of the above structure/absolute
a
and 15b, respectively. After the separation of each component
Supplementary data (spectroscopic data for all intermediates,
structural analysis of 10b0, details of the transformation of 15b into
12b) associated with this article can be found, in the online version,
a
to deriva-
a
a
a
D
References and notes
a
1. Segraves, N. L.; Crews, P. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 118–121.
2. Tejima, S.; Fletcher, H. G., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 2999–3004.
3. (a) Yoda, H.; Katoh, H.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7661–7665; (b)
Lay, L.; Nicotra, F.; Paganini, A.; Panza, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 4555–4558.
4. On the basis of the coincidence spectral data and the mechanistic sequence
identical to the literature procedure employing D-antipode of 1, it is reasonable
a
to assume that
3 would have the (R)-configuration at the newly formed
stereocenter, see Ref. 3a.
5. (a) Yoda, H.; Yamazaki, H.; Kawauchi, M.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1995, 6, 2669–2672; (b) Yoda, H.; Nakajima, T.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 5531–5534; (c) Yoda, H.; Oguchi, T.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997,
38, 3283–3284; (d) Yoda, H.; Uemura, T.; Takabe, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
977–979.
configuration relationship is that the C8 stereochemistries of 14
a
and 14b should be R and S, respectively.
6. On the basis of simple 1H NMR spectral data, it is reasonable to assume that 6
was formed as a single diastereomer.
OBn
O
O
7. (a) Ram, S.; Ehrenkaufer, R. E. Synthesis 1988, 91–95; (b) Radinov, R.; Hutchings,
S. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8955–8960.
3
4
OBn
Ph
Ph
a
OR
8
2
8. (a) Chiesa, M. V.; Manzoni, L.; Scolastico, C. Synlett 1996, 441–443; (b) Belvisi,
L.; Colombo, L.; Colombo, M.; Di Giacomo, M.; Manzoni, L.; Vodopivec, B.;
Scolastico, C. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6463–6473; (c) Artale, E.; Banfi, G.; Belvisi,
L.; Colombo, L.; Colombo, M.; Manzoni, L.; Scolastico, C. Tetrahedron 2003, 59,
6241–6250.
11
5
OBn
MeO CF3
F3C OMe
N
Boc
1
*
7
6
(R)-MTPA
(S)-MTPA
15α; less polar
15
β; more polar
9. The crude HCl salts were purified on DOWEX 50W-X8 (H+ form resin) column
with aqueous NH3 at 0.7 M prior to use.
c
(R = H)
12
β
b
10. The observed optical rotation of 14b (½a D25
ꢂ
+9.3 (c 0.5, MeOH)) close to that for
+10 (c 0.5, MeOH), see Ref. 1) indicated their
(
)
(
) 16
(R = (S)-MTPA or (R)-MTPA)
α
S - or R -
the natural product (lit. ½a D25
ꢂ
structural and stereochemical identity.
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) CH2@CHCH2Br, Mg, THF, ꢀ40 °C, 1 h then
ꢀ30 °C, 2 h; 58% (15 ), 27% (15b); (b) (R)- or (S)-MTPA-Cl, py, rt, 24 h (for (S)-16 ),
5 days (for (R)-16 ); 46% ((S)-16 ), 81% ((R)-16 ); (c) (i) 1-octene, Grubbs II
complex, toluene, rt, 4.5 h; (ii) H2, Pd/C(en), MeOH, rt, 12 h; 61% (for two steps).
11. (a) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 3732–3738; (b) Ohtani, I.;
Kusumi, T.; Kakisawa, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4092–4096; (c) Seco, J. M.;
Quinoa, E.; Riguera Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 17–117.
a
a
a
a
a
12. Molander, G. A.; Harris, C. R. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 307–338.