1496
C. Sall et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 1493–1497
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.3
cpd 4
cpd 4
0.25
Norfloxacin
Control
cpd 10
Norfloxacin
0.2
Control
0.15
cpd 10
0.1
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0.05
0
0
100
200
300
400
500
0
100
200
300
400
500
Time (min)
Time (min)
Figure 3. Effect of compounds 4, 10 and norfloxacin on bacterial growth at concentrations of 10
lM (left) and 100
lM (right).
10. Rodrıguez-Borges, J.-E.; Goncalves, S.; Vale, M. L.; Garcia-Mera, X.; Coelho, A.;
Sotelo, E. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 372.
11. Zhang, J.; Chen, H. N.; Chiang, F. I.; Takemoto, J. Y.; Bensaci, M.; Chang, C. W. T. J.
Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 17.
12. Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3057.
13. Meldal, M.; Tornoe, C. W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2952.
14. Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2596.
15. Huisgen, R. 1, 3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry; Wiley: New York, 1984.
pp 1–176.
16. Olagnier, D.; Costes, P.; Berry, A.; Linas, M. D.; Urrutigoity, M.; Dechy-Cabaretb,
O.; Benoit-Vical, F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6075.
17. Wilkinson, B. L.; Long, H.; Sim, E.; Fairbanks, A. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008,
18, 6265.
18. Formation of azide was monitored by TLC. Trying to purify azides by
chromatography did not improve yields of the following steps, and in
addition some of them were obtained after with low yields purification
(probably due to their degradation under the conditions of purification).
19. Dyall, L. K.; L’abbé, G.; Dehaen, W. J. Chem. Soc. 1997, 2, 971.
20. Typical method for preparation of compounds 3-20: To a stirred solution of
aniline (1 g) in H2O/HCl (50/50, 15 mL/15 mL) was added NaNO2 (0.8 g,
11.55 mmol). The whole was stirred at 0 °C for 2 h, and then NaN3 was
added (0.78 g, 11.55 mmol). The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h. After
extraction with dichloromethane, the resulting crude azide (100 mg) was
In summary, from natural diterpenic frameworks, we have de-
signed biological active analogues in an efficient way allowing fur-
ther developments. Through the generation of this library, the
principal several relevant point when concerning SAR data in the
field of specific anti-biofilm activity is that, as hypothesized from
semi-empirical calculations which showed the similarities of the
two series, the nature of the linker modulates the activity but does
not generate fundamental changes in the biological response.
However, further studies are needed in order to highlight precisely
the effect of the terpenic chain. Finally, the low toxicity of the
derivatives allows us to focuses our interest in the development
of these molecules as non-toxic anti-biofilm compounds for poten-
tial use as non toxic co-biocides or co-antibiotics in view of rational
eradication of persistent biofilms. In this way, further studies are
actually in course in order to optimize the nature of the linker as
well as to define the mechanism of action of this class of
compounds.
dissolved in
a solution of H2O/EtOH (50/50 1.5 mL/1.5 mL) containing
Acknowledgements
CuSO4ꢀ5H2O (0.3 equiv), alkyne (1.5 equiv) and sodium ascorbate (0.4 equiv).
The resulting mixture was stirred 12 h at room temperature. A saturated
solution of Na2CO3 was added and the resulting solution extracted three times
with ethyl acetate. Organic layers were then dried over Na2SO4 and evaporated
to give the crude triazoles which were purified by flash chromatography eluted
with hexane/ethyl acetate.
The Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain was gracefully supplied by
IFREMER; Service Interfaces et Capteurs, IFREMER Brest, France.
21. Spectral data for selected compounds: 4-[((E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyl-
oxy)methyl]-1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (3); (ESI, m/z) 364.35
(M+Na+), 342.38 (M+H+). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 1.29 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.37
(s, 3H), 1.38 (s, 3H), 1.73-1.84 (m, 4H), 3.50 (s, 3H), 3.83 (d, 2H, J = 6.7 Hz), 4.39
(s, 2H), 4.88 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 5.11 (t, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz), 6.37 (m, 2H), 7;05 (dt, 1H,
J = 8.3 and 1.6 Hz), 7.43 (dd, 1H, J = 7.7 and 1.3 Hz), 7,95 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
(CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 15.7, 16.8, 24.9, 25.6, 38.8, 55.0, 62.4, 66.0, 111.5, 119.9,
120.2, 120.4, 123.2, 124.3, 124.9, 125.5, 129.3, 130.6, 139.7, 150.2. 4-[((E)-3,7-
dimethylocta-2,6-dienyloxy)methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole
(4); (ESI, m/z) 364.33 (M+Na+), 342.37 (M+H+). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 1.26
(s, 1H), 1.33 (s, 1H), 1.35 (s, 1H), 1.69–1.80 (m, 4H), 3.50 (s, 3H), 3.82 (d, 2H,
J = 7.1 Hz,), 4.35 (s, 2H), 4.77 (t, 1H, J = 5.5 Hz), 5.07 (t, 1H, J = 6.7 Hz), 6,60 (m,
1H), 6.96 (m, 1H), 7.10–7.14(m, 2H), 7.90 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d
16.3, 17.5, 25.5, 26.3, 39.5, 55.3, 60.2, 66.9, 106.0, 112.1, 114.2, 120.5, 123.9,
124.0, 130.3, 130.4, 131.3, 138.0, 140.5, 160.5, 170.7. 4-[((E)-3,7-dimethylocta-
2,6-dienyloxy)methyl]-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole (5); (ESI, m/z)
364.25 (M+Na+), 342.28 (M+H+), 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 1.59 (s, 3H); 1.66
(brs, 6H); 2.02–2.09 (m, 4H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 4.08 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz’), 4.12 (s, 2H),
5.08 (t, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz), 5.32 (t, 1H, J = 6 Hz), 7.01 (d, 2H, J = 7.0 Hz), 7.61 (d, 2H,
J = 7.0 Hz), 7.91 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 16.4, 17.8, 25.8, 26.5, 39.7,
55.7, 63.5, 67.2, 114.9, 120.4, 122.3, 123.6 (2C), 124.1 (2C), 130.6, 131.8, 139.4,
141.2, 159.9. 3-(4-(((E)-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienyloxy)methyl)-1H-1,2,3-
triazol-1-yl)benzoic acid (10); (ESI, m/z) 377.94 (M+Na+). 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz) d 1.49 (s, 3H), 1.55 (s, 3H), 1.60 (s, 3H), 1.90–2.10 (m, 4H), 4.07 (d,
J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 4.67 (s, 2H), 4.99 (m, 1H), 5.31 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, 2H,
J = 7.8 Hz), 7.98 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8,06 (m, 2H), 8.32 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3,
100 MHz) d 16.8, 17.9, 25.9, 26.5, 39.8, 63.4, 67.4, 120.1, 120.6, 121.8, 124.1,
125.7, 130.3, 130.5, 131.4, 132.0, 137.4, 141.6, 146.8, 170.7. 4-[((2E,6E)-3,7,11-
trimethyldodeca-2,6,10-trienyloxy)methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-1H-1,2,3-
triazole (13); (ESI, m/z) 410.42 (M+H+). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d 1.40 (s, 3H),
1.41 (s, 3H), 1.47 (s, 3H), 1.50 (s, 3H), 1.77–1.97 (m, 8H), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.95 (d,
2H, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.51 (s, 2H), 4.91 (m, 2H), 5.22 (t, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz), 6.74 (m, 1H),
7.05 (m, 1H), 7.13–7.19 (m, 2H), 7.84 (s, 1H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 16.1,
References and notes
1. Hall-Stoodley, L.; Costerton, J. W.; Stoodley, P. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 2, 95–
108.
2. Saint, S.; Chenoweth, C. E. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 2003, 17, 411.
3. Omae, I. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3431; Haras, D. Mater. Technol. 2005, 93, 27.
4. Qian, P. Y.; Lau, S. C. K.; Dahms, H. U.; Dobretsov, S.; Harder, T. Marine Biotech.
2007, 9, 399.
5. Maréchal, J. P.; Culioli, G.; Hellio, C.; Thomas-Guyonc, H.; Callowd, M. E.; Clarea,
A. S.; Ortalo-Magné, A. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Eco. 2004, 313, 47.
6. Culioli, G.; Ortalo-Magne, A.; Valls, A.; Hellio, C.; Clare, S.; Piovetti, L. J. Nat. Prod.
2008, 71, 1121.
7. Bodet, C.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Curini, M.; Grenier, D. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 43, 1612.
8. Praud-Tabariès, A.; Dombrowsky, L.; Bottzek, O.; Briand, J. F.; Blache, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1645.
9. Computational methods: The geometry of a selected molecule was optimized to
an rms (root mean square) gradient of 0.01 in vacuo (Polak–Ribière method). A
periodic box, 15–15–15 Å around the drug was then set up, containing 112
water molecules. The system was optimized in MM+ using switched cut-offs
(outer 10 and inner 14 Å) to an rms gradient of 0.5. Then a molecular dynamics
program was run for 1 ps, with 0.001 ps steps, relaxation time 0.1 ps, to a 30
simulation temperature of 300 K. This was followed by MM+ geometry
optimization to an rms gradient of 0.2. The molecular dynamics run was
repeated and a further MM+ protocol was carried out to a gradient of rms 0.2
on the selected drug. Finally, the geometries were optimized using the
semiempirical AM1 programme in singly excited configuration interaction to
a
gradient of rms 0.01. (RHF [Restricted Hartree–Fock], charge 0, spin
multiplicity 1, lowest state, orbital criterion, five occupied and five
unoccupied orbitals.). Properties (c Log P, hydratation energies) were
obtained from these semiempirical calculations with the QSAR package
implemented in HyperChem Release 8.05 pro for Windows (Hypercube Inc.
Gainesville, Florida.)