J. Uda et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 40 (2021) 127900
assays (Table 3). These test compounds inhibited URAT1-mediated
transport of uric acid but had almost no inhibitory effect on uric acid
uptake by RPTECs. Thus, our results did not show a correlation between
the URAT1 and RPTEC assays, and these new compounds were not
potent enough to inhibit uptake in the RPTEC assay.
3-Pyrroline derivative 3a and pyrrolidine 4a had moderate URAT1
inhibitory activity, but almost no MIA. Therefore, the aliphatic mono-
cyclic amide-linked structure removed the MIA toxicity of the bis-aryl
ketone structure while maintaining UUI activity. We hypothesized that
the UUI activity in the URAT1 and the RPTEC assay could be enhanced
by structural optimization. We synthesized additional 3-pyrroline and
pyrrolidine derivatives by replacing substituents on the phenyl ring in
compounds 3 and 4.
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathway for 5-membered ring derivatives 2, 3 and 4.
Reagents and conditions: 5-membered ring = 3-pyrroline, pyrrolidine ; (a) X =
OH; EDC, HOBt in DMF and CH2Cl2, or X = Cl; NEt3, CH2Cl2: 5-membered ring
= pyrrole; (a) X = Cl; NaH, THF: (b) R3 = MOM; HCl, AcOEt, R3 = Me; LiCl,
DMF, 21–96% yield over two steps.
The synthetic pathway for 2a, 3 and 4 is shown in Scheme 1. These
amide-linked phenol derivatives were prepared by acylation of 5-
membered amines and following deprotection. Substituted benzoic
acids as intermediates have been prepared earlier,20 and we have
described some new substituted benzoic acids in the supplementary
information. The acylation of 3-pyrroline and pyrrolidine was accom-
plished with 3,5-disubstituted 4-methoxy or 4-methoxymethoxy -ben-
zoic acid and 1-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide
hydrochloride (EDC), or acid chloride and triethylamine. The N-acyla-
tion of pyrrole was accomplished with acid chloride and sodium hydride
as a base. Subsequent deprotection of the hydroxyl group on the phenyl
ring yielded the desired analogs 2a, 3 and 4.
Table 4
UUI and MIA of compounds 3 and 4.
Com-
R1, R2
UUIa
MIAb IC50
pound
URAT1 %
RPTEC IC50
M)
(μM) or %
inhibition at 3
μ
M
(μ
3c
3d
3e
3f
I, CN
79%
58%
49%
83%
66%
25%
69%
70%
92%
69%
> 1000
> 1000
903
8%
6%
CN, SMe
n-Pr, CF3
CF3, CN
Cl, CN
47%
ꢀ 1%
5%
818
3g
3h
3i
> 1000
> 1000
747
Me, CN
Br, CN
ꢀ 10%
0%
Compounds 3 and 4 were assessed in the in vitro uptake assays
(Table 4). Although almost all derivatives inhibited URAT1-mediated
transport of uric acid, they had almost no inhibitory activity against
uric acid uptake by RPTECs, with a few exceptions. Compound 3k
showed potent URAT1 inhibitory activity and moderate inhibition in the
RPTEC assay while having considerably weak MIA. Moreover, although
3f exhibited lower potency than 3k in the URAT1 and RPTEC assays, it is
a promising lead compound due to the absence of MIA.
3j
n-Pr, CN
tert-Bu, CN
cyclopropyl,
CN
> 1000
311
7%
3k
3l
60% (64
μ
M)
> 1000
ꢀ 7%
4b
CF3, CN
66%
> 1000
18%
a
b
UUI: inhibition of urate uptake via URAT1 or by RPTECs.
MIA: mitochondrial respiratory control ratio (RCR), IC50
M.
(μM) or inhibition
(%) at 100
μ
Next, we focused on the core ring structure. Compounds 6 de-
rivatives with various core ring moieties, including azetidine, 3-methyl-
3-pyrroline, thiazolidine and dioxo-thiazolidine were synthesized ac-
cording to the same pathway as compounds 3 and 4 presented in Scheme
1, using 4- or 5-membered ring amines as the starting material. Dioxo-
thiazolidine derivative 6i was prepared by oxidation of thiazolidine
type intermediate 7 using meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA)
and following deprotection of phenol (Scheme 2). The UUI activities of
the derivatives were investigated in the URAT1 and RPTEC assays
(Table 5).
Scheme 2. Synthetic pathway for 6i. Reagents and conditions: (a) m-CPBA,
CH2Cl2, 98.8% yield, (b) LiCl, DMF, 83.5% yield.
We found that almost all compounds had URAT1 inhibitory activ-
ities. However, in the RPTEC assay, some thiazolidine and 3-methyl-3-
pyrroline derivatives, especially 6c, 6d, 6f, and 6g, showed moderate
activity, whereas azetidine derivatives showed no activity. The tert-Bu
derivative 6g had the highest URAT1 inhibitory activity among those
four compounds, but it also had the highest MIA. Thus, we found that the
compounds with higher LogP values tended to have higher UUI and MIA
values, which was the same tendency that we observed among the
bicyclic derivatives, such as the indoline analogs, as previously
described.20 Although compounds 6c, 6d, and 6f showed weaker UUI
activity than BBR or dotinurad, they exhibited almost no MIA. Thus,
these derivatives exhibited a clear divergence between two crucial pa-
rameters for uricosuric agents (UUI and MIA). Therefore, if they have
appropriate pharmacokinetics (PK) profiles, sufficient activity might be
observed in humans.
Next, we investigated the PK profiles of the four most promising
compounds from our inhibition analysis, 3f, 6c, 6d, and 6f. According to
our hypothesis, the presence of active compounds in the urine is
essential for the pharmacological effects because URAT1 is located on
the luminal side of epithelial cells of the renal tubule.20 BBR is consid-
ered to produce its activity, at least in part, by the active metabolite 6-
OH-BBR. This BBR metabolite appears to be involved in the inhibition of
uric acid reabsorption from the luminal side of epithelial cells of the
renal tubule where the urine is present.26–28 Unlike BBR, the compounds
in this study do not require the conversion to active metabolites avoi-
dimg the involvement of metabolizing enzymes, such as CYP2C9.
Therefore, the presence of the parent compounds in the urine (Exc. % of
the dose) was a potential indication of activity in humans.
Table 3
UUI (URAT1 and RPTEC assays) and MIA of 2a, 3a and 4a.
Com-
UUIa
MIAb IC50
%
(μM) or
pound
URAT1 % inhibition at 3
RPTEC IC50
M)
μM
(μ
2a
3a
83%
54%
84%
91%
> 1,000
> 1,000
> 1,000
6.8
6.7
> 100 (17%)
> 100 (22%)
3.1
4a
BBR
a
b
UUI: inhibition of urate uptake via URAT1 or by RPTECs.
MIA: mitochondrial respiratory control ratio (RCR), IC50
M.
The PK profiles of 3f, 6c, 6d, and 6f are shown in Table 6. Compound
3f exhibited the highest excretion in the urine and weak CYP2C9
(μM) or inhibition
(%) at 100
μ
3