Journal of the American Chemical Society
ARTICLE
Table 2. Calculated Raman Peak Positions for OrganoꢀHalo Aluminum Anions and Molecules in THF
anion
peak position, cmꢀ1
molecule
peak position, cmꢀ1
Ph4Alꢀ
Ph3AlClꢀ
186
193
614 (E2g)
614 ('E2g')
614 ('E2g')
614 ('E2g')
167 (T2)
638 (E2g)
644 (“E2g”)
652 (“E2g”)
662 (“E2g”)
326 (A1)
Ph3Al THFꢀ
196
272
275
614 ('E2g')
646 (“E2g”)
657 (“E2g”)
672 (“E2g”)
3
ꢀ
Ph2AlCl2
252
Ph2AlCl THF
614 ('E2g')
613 ('E2g')
3
ꢀ
PhAlCl3
276
PhAlCl2 THF
3
ꢀ
AlCl4
107 (E)
The Raman spectra of these crystals, containing tꢀhe unam-
biguously identified Mg2Cl3þ, Ph4Alꢀ, and AlCl4 species
(coordinated by THF), were also used for the Raman spectra
library. Figure 3 displays the Raman spectra of C4 (solid), C2
(solid), and redissolved C4 saturated solution in THF.
wagging ('E2g'), devoid of CꢀAl stretching, and the peaks in the
638ꢀ662 cmꢀ1 region relate, in all cases, to the ring stretching
(“E2g”) mode, combined with CꢀAl stretching. The appearance
of distinct and unique bands for each of the different ions allows
the identification of the aluminum core species in the solutions,
based solely on Raman spectroscopy.
C4 (c) and C2 (d) spectra are very unique, as they exhibit
unambiguously identified components, one for each metal core,
with the addition of crystal-bound THF. The crystal-bound THF
spectral characteristics, as expected, are somewhat different from
those of the free THF. In these spectra the main THF peak at
914 cmꢀ1 splits into two narrow peaks.17 In order to confirm that
these peaks indeed belong to THF, we dissolved ∼1 M THF in
water [see Figure 3b]. In this state the THF molecules are solvated
by water, and thus, presumably, lack THFꢀTHF interactions. This
assisted in identifying and excluding all the crystal-bound THF
peaks appearing in the C4 and C2 solids spectra. The C2 crystal
exhibits only four peaks, neglecting the THF ones: three at 115(E),
180(T2), and 348(A1) cmꢀ1, attributed to AlCl4ꢀ. The very weak
feature at 241 cmꢀ1, pertaining6 to Mg2Cl3þ, is attributed to a minor
residue. As did Sobota et al.17 who also investigated similar
complexes, we did not detect any features attributable to MgClþ.
Due to the low solubility of C2 in THF, no Raman spectrum of its
solution could be obtained.
Several interesting observations and trends may be deduced from
the calculated data and their relation to the measured values
(Table 2). First, as can be seen from the listed values, the calculated
spectra predict a clear trend for the first and third row peak positions
versus Ph:Cl ratio. The higher this ratio, the higher the peak position
in cmꢀ1, although the computed vibrations are consistently lower
than the experimental ones. Additionally, the peaks associated with
the middle column are practically constant, regardless of the Ph:Cl
ratio, both for the measured and the calculated spectra. This result is
expected as the 'E2g' vibration, at 624 cmꢀ1 involved only the
benzene-ring bonds.
Previous multinuclear NMR analysis3 of a homologue series of
compounds containing aliphatic ligands showed clearly that the 27Al
ꢀ
NMR spectra for the anions RyAlCl4ꢀy and the molecules
Ry AlCl3ꢀy THF (y = 1ꢀ4; y0 = 1ꢀ3) are identical whenever
0
3
y = y0; e.g. R2AlCl2ꢀ exhibits the same spectrum as R2AlCl THF.
3
Hence, from 27Al NMR analysis point of view, the Clꢀ ligand has the
same influence on the chemical shift as THF. Interestingly, we
observed a similar trend in the Raman spectra for the Al core anions
and the neutral molecules in the current study. For instance, the
most important features of the calculated and experimental Raman
þ
The C4 (c) spectrum displays clearly the expected Mg2Cl3
peak as a strong feature at 241 cmꢀ1. The other peaks, at 201,
624(”E2g'), 649(“E2g”), 985, 997, and 1152 cmꢀ1 are all attrib-
uted to the symmetrical tetraphenyl aluminate ion. The peak at
624 cmꢀ1 invariably appears whenever a phenyl group is present
in the system.
spectra for Ph3AlClꢀ are very similar to those for Ph3Al THF. The
3
calculated Raman spectra show the same trend for all the vibrations,
ꢀ
Interestingly, as can be seen in spectra (a) and (c) of Figure 3,
there is no difference in the peak positions for C4 as solid crystal or as
THF solution. This later allowed with great certainty the identifica-
tion of the existence of both Mg2Cl3þ and Ph4Alꢀ in solutions.
Spectrum (a) is characterized by five unique peaks, at 201, 649-
(“E2g”), 985, 997, and 1152 cmꢀ1. As gathered from the NMR,
elemental analysis, and the Raman spectra, the peaks in the
1000 cmꢀ1 region pertain solely to phenyl ligands around the
aluminum core. The exact peak positions change very little with the
nature of the aluminum-core molecule or ion, regardless of the Ph:Cl
ratio. The 201 and 649 cmꢀ1 peaks, on the other hand, are exclusive
to Ph4Alꢀ, and exist both for the solid C4 crystal, and its solution,
though with some peak-shape difference for the 201 cmꢀ1 peak.
We calculated the Raman spectra for the five possible
PhyAlCl4ꢀyꢀ ions (y = 0ꢀ4), and their neutral forms, focusing
only on the most significant (intense) peaks. Each molecule has a
single strong peak in the 250 cmꢀ1 region and two strong peaks
in the 650 cmꢀ1 region. Table 2 summarizes the relevant
calculated peaks for these materials:
except for the lowest vibration for Ph2AlCl2 and Ph2AlCl THF
3
(252 and 272 cmꢀ1, respectively). However, careful 13C NMR
analysis of the spectra of a wide range of anionic and neutral species
indicated small but significant and consistent differences that make a
distinction between these species. Based on these results (to be
published soon) we conclude that no detectable levels of aluminum-
based neutral compounds exist in the above solutions.
It is worth mentioning that the peak at 201 cmꢀ1 in the C4
spectrum is very close to the 212 cmꢀ1 peak of MgCl2, and to one
for the calculated Ph3AlClꢀ peak. This, in some cases, hampers
the unambiguous identification of all the components in some of
the more species-rich solutions.
Two important reference solutions provided important spec-
tral information: Ph3Al THF in THF and an APC solution
3
containing PhAlCl3ꢀ as the major anion. The later solution, APC
1:1 (cs), was synthesized by reacting equimolar quantities of
PhMgCl with AlCl3 in THF at 0ꢀ°C. NMR analysis indicated that
this solution contains PhAlCl3 as the major anionic product
plus low concentration of Ph2AlCl2ꢀ (see Figure S6, SI).
Not only these bands are the most intense in the specified
region, but also each column represents the same vibrational
mode, as judged from visualization of the normal vibrational
modes. For instance, the 614 cmꢀ1 band pertains to phenyl ring
Figure 4 displays the Raman spectra of Ph3Al THF/THF and
APC 1:1 (cs) solutions.
3
As can be seen in Figure 4, both Ph3Al THF and APC 1:1 (cs)
3
solutions exhibit the expected peaks at 624, 985, 997, and
6273
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja1098512 |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6270–6278