privileged ring systems as well as substructures found in
natural products. One such strategy combines a multi-
component assembly process (MCAP) involving three or
more reactants to prepare pivotal intermediates that are
transformed into heterocyclic scaffolds by various ring-
forming reactions that are directed by selective pairing of
functional groups.4ꢀ6 We have now developed a useful
extension of this strategy, wherein tetrahydropyridines,
which are accessed via a MCAP and a subsequent ring-
closing metathesis (RCM), are transformed into a number
of privileged scaffolds. We now present some of the details
of these investigations.
and biarylisoindolinones similar to 5ꢀ7 exhibit KDR
inhibitory activity.12 Indeed, biaryls are privileged scaf-
folds that are present in 4.3% of all known drugs.1,13
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Isoindolinone Scaffold 4 and Subsequent
Suzuki Cross-Coupling
To develop this new approach to scaffold generation, a
suitably functionalized tetrahydropyridine, such as 3, was
needed. Accordingly, reaction of 2-bromo-6-chlorobenzal-
dehyde (1),7 allylamine, CbzꢀCl, and allylzinc bromide in a
Mannich-like MCAP gave diene 2 in 89% yield (Scheme 1).
Cyclization of 2 via a RCM reaction delivered the pivotal
intermediate 3. Tactics for its elaboration into various
heterocyclic scaffolds, especially privileged substructures,
were then explored.
Tetrahydropyridine 3 underwent facile Heck cyclization
under Jeffrey’s conditions14 and microwave irradiation to
provide the enecarbamate 10, a versatile intermediate that
is nicely functionalized for a number of diversification
reactions (Scheme 3). For example, electron-rich enecar-
bamates are excellent inputs in imino DielsꢀAlder reac-
tions, such as the Povarov reaction.15,16 Although Povarov
reactions involving substrates having the structural com-
plexity of 10 are not known, we discovered that the
reaction of 10 with p-toluidine and ethyl glyoxylate in the
presence of Sc(OTf)3 gave a readily separable mixture
(1.2:1.0) of diastereomeric tetrahydroquinolines 11 and
12 in 84% yield. Formation of a mixture of stereoisomers
was not unexpected because Povarov reactions often
proceed with low stereoselectivity. The relative stereo-
chemistry of 11 was verified by single X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis, whereas the structure of 12 was
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Tetrahydropyridine 3
The isoindolinone ring system, which is found in the
potent antiviral natural product stachyflin,8 is one impor-
tant member of the family of privileged scaffolds.9 Intri-
gued by the possibility of preparing isoindolinones from 3
via a Parham cyclization,10 we found that treatment of 3
with n-BuLi at ꢀ100 °C gave isoindolinone 4 in 60% yield
(Scheme 2). To illustrate possible tactics for diversifying 4,
it was subjected to Suzuki cross-coupling reactions with
electron-rich and electron-deficient arylboronic acids to
give biaryls 5 and 6; hydrogenation of 5 provided saturated
amide 7. Relative to possibilities for biological activity, it is
notable that cyclohexyl-fused isoindolinones similar to 4
possess potent urotensin-II receptor antagonist activity,11
tentatively assigned on the basis of a value of JH2ꢀH3
=
3.4 Hz, which is consistent with the proposed stereochem-
istry and not with the trans-diaxial relationship expected
for the C(3)-epimer.17 The indanyl quinoline 14, the
structure of which was secured by X-ray crystallography,
was also isolated in 5ꢀ10% yield; 14 is presumably
(5) For a review of such strategies, see: Sunderhaus, J. D.; Martin,
S. F. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1300–1308.
(6) (a) Sunderhaus, J. D.; Dockendorff, C.; Martin, S. F. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 4223–4226. (b) Sunderhaus, J. D.; Dockendorff, C.; Martin,
S. F. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6454–6469.
(12) Curtin, M. L.; Frey, R. R.; Heyman, R. H.; Sarris, K. A.;
Steinman, D. H.; Holmes, J. H.; Bousquet, P. J.; Cunha, G. A.; Moskey,
M. D.; Ahmed, A. A.; Pease, L. J.; Glaser, K. B.; Stewart, K. D.;
Davidsen, S. K.; Michaelides, M. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14,
4505–4509.
(7) Rawalpally, T.; Ji, Y.; Shankar, A.; Edward, W.; Allen, J.; Jian,
Y.; Cleary, T. P.; Pierce, M. E. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2008, 12, 1293–
1298.
(8) Minagawa, K.; Kouzuki, S.; Kamigauchi, T. J. Antibiot. 2002, 55,
165–171.
(13) Hajduk, P. J.; Bures, M.; Praestgaard, J.; Fesik, S. W. J. Med.
Chem. 2000, 43, 3443–3447.
(14) Jeffrey, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 2667–2670.
(15) For reviews on the Povarov reaction, see: (a) Povarov, L. S.
Russ. Chem. Rev. 1967, 36, 656–670. (b) Glushkov, V. A.; Tolstikov,
A. G. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2008, 77, 137–159. (c) Kouznetsov, V. V.
Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2721–2750.
(9) Zhu, J.; Nueville, L.; Salcido, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3600–
3603.
(10) Parham, W. E.; Bradsher, C. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 300–
305.
(11) Lawson, E. C.; Luci, D. K.; Ghosh, S.; Kinny, W. A.; Reynolds,
C. H.; Qi, J.; Smith, C. E.; Wang, Y.; Minor, L. K.; Haertlein, B. J.;
Parry, T. J.; Damiano, B. P.; Maryanoff, B. E. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52,
7432–7445.
(16) (a) Powell, D. A.; Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2913–2916. (b)
Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V.; Sunitha, V.; Reddy, S. K.; Ramakrishna,
K. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7947–7950. (c) Hu, Y. J.; Tomaszewski,
M.; Walpole, C. PCT Int. Appl. WO 075476 A1 20050818, 2005.
(17) Adduct 12 undergoes spontaneous oxidation to 13 and could not
be isolated in pure form.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 10, 2011
2591