2146
D. Yang et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 52 (2011) 2144–2147
Eqs. 2–4, related substrates 15, 17, and 19 could also be converted
to products containing a quaternary center (16, 18, 20) in ca. 50%
yield. Aiming to define a synthetically more useful coupling reac-
tion, 1,4-diols could be prepared from a related reaction of allylic
alcohol 21 with chlorodimethylvinyl silane 22. Here, reductive
cross-coupling was followed by oxidation of the C–Si bond to deli-
ver diol 23 in 49% yield (over two-steps).
R4
H
R4
H
N
N
R4
R3
R3
R3
R4
R3
R2 HN
OH
OH HN
previously
present
*
R1
R1
*
*
described
observations
R2 Me
R1
R2
when R1 = H, aryl, vinyl, or alkyl;
R2 = Me, Et, Cl, Br, I
Coupling reactions that proceed by allylic transposition:
While these observations marked a dramatic shift in regioselec-
tion for reductive cross-coupling reactions of benzylic alcohols,
similar results were obtained for the coupling of the 1,4-diene-
3-ol substrate 24 with 22. After the two-step process of cross-
coupling and oxidation, the 1,4-diol 25 was isolated in 59% yield.
Next, we aimed to realize a version of this coupling reaction
that would be suitable for generating a stereodefined quaternary
center. As depicted in Eq. 7 of Figure 3, these efforts targeted the
coupling of substrate 26 with 22. While the only difference in sub-
strate structure of 26 with respect to substrate 24 was the substi-
tution of a Me- group for an Et-substituent, this coupling reaction
of 26 with 22 delivered diene 27 in 73% yield; no evidence was
found for the production of 28. Overall, this result indicated that
the regioselection associated with coupling reactions of benzylic-
and allylic- alcohols is quite sensitive to subtle perturbation of sub-
strate structure.
In the related coupling reactions of allylic alcohols with imines,
a similar change in regioselection was not observed. As shown in
Eq. 8 of Figure 4, coupling of the benzylic alcohol 11 with imine
29 proceeds in 87% yield, and delivers the homoallylic amine prod-
uct 30. Unlike the coupling reaction of 11 with a vinylsilane, no
evidence could be found for the formation of a product containing
a quaternary center. Similarly, the coupling of allylic alcohol 26
with 29 also delivered homoallylic amine products (Eq. 9).
Interestingly, in this subset of reductive cross-coupling, if the
starting material is a primary allylic alcohol, substantial quantities
of isomeric products result. For example, coupling of 32a with 29
resulted in a 2:1 mixture of products 33a and 34a in 90% combined
yield (Eq. 10). While the product containing a quaternary center
was the minor product of this transformation, a subtle change in
the structure of 32a resulted in a significant perturbation of the
reaction course. As depicted in Eq. 11, coupling of 32b with imine
29 resulted in the preferential formation of the 1,3-aminoalcohol
product 34b over the homoallylic amine 33b (selectivity = 4:1).2f
The stereochemistry of the major product formed was addressed
as illustrated in Eq. 12. Here, coupling of 32b with imine 35 was
followed by formation of the rigid bicyclic heterocycle 37. Subse-
quent NOE analysis indicated that the major product of this cou-
pling reaction is as depicted in 36.
Bn
Ti(Oi-Pr)4
Me HN
30
Bn
H
OH
N
c-C5H9MgCl, Et2O
+
(8)
Ph
then NaHCO3 (sat)
87%
Me
11
29
Bn
Et HN
Ti(Oi-Pr)4
Me OH
c-C5H9MgCl, Et2O
+
(9)
29
Me
Me
then NaHCO3 (sat)
73%
Et
Me
26
31*
* = isolated as a 1:0.7 mixture of alkene isomers
Coupling reactions that proceed with unique regioselection:
Combined influence of TMSCH2- and a 1° allylic alcohol
Ti(Oi-Pr)4
Bn
OH
Bn
OH HN
c-C5H9MgCl, Et2O
R
HN
+
+
29
then NaHCO3 (sat)
R
Me
R
allylic alcohol:
yield:
90%
ratio (33:34):
(10)
(11)
32a; R = Me
2:1
1:4
33a; R = Me
33b; R = CH2TMS
34a; R = Me
32b; R = CH2TMS 94%
34b; R = CH2TMS
Concerning stereochemistry of the 1,3-amino alcohol products:
MeO
MeO
H
OMe
Ti(Oi-Pr)4
OH
(
)
2
MeO
c-C5H9MgCl, Et2O
HO HN
+
(12)
TMS
32b
N
then NaHCO3 (sat)
58%
Me
H
Ph
TMS
35
36
dr = 4:1
Me
O
N
37
TMS
Ph
nOe
O
N
H
H
HCl
H
H
THF
94%
nOe
stereochemistry of major product
Me
TMS
37
Regioselection is influenced by substitution at the allylic position:
Ti(Oi-Pr)4
TMS
Bn
Bn
H
OH
HN
N
c-C5H9MgCl, Et2O
+
(13)
Me
TMS
38
Ph
then NaHCO3 (sat)
70%
Me
29
39
While the reaction of 32b with imines is selective for the forma-
tion of products containing a quaternary center, simple substitu-
tion of this starting material results in a shift of regioselection
back to the preferential formation of homoallylic amine products.
As depicted in Eq. 13, coupling of the secondary allylic alcohol 38
with imine 29 results in the formation of 39 in 70% yield, as a single
olefin isomer. Here, no evidence was found for the production of a
1,3-aminoalcohol-containing product.2f
These studies have identified structural features that lead to
a change in the regiochemical course of Ti(Oi-Pr)4-mediated
reductive cross-coupling reactions between allylic alcohols and
vinylsilanes or imines. The factors that influence each of these
cross-coupling reactions are distinct. With vinylsilane-based cou-
pling reactions, additional unsaturation (in the form of a benzylic
alcohol or a 1,4-diene-3-ol system) shifts the regiochemical course
of coupling. In these cases, substantial quantities of products con-
taining a quaternary carbon are formed. With imine–allylic alcohol
coupling, such additional unsaturation does not affect the regio-
chemical course of reductive cross-coupling. However, a different
structural feature shifts regioselection in these reactions. Specifi-
no evidence found for the
production of a regio- or
stereoisomeric product
Figure 4. Access to quaternary centers by allylic alcohol–imine reductive cross-
coupling.
cally, coupling of primary allylic alcohols with imines results in a
substantial quantity of product containing a 1,3-aminoalcohol
and accompanying quaternary center. This tendency is further en-
hanced with a substrate that contains a TMSCH2-substituent (32b),
indicating a potential role of electronic factors in changing the
regiochemical course of this coupling reaction. A mechanistic
rationale in support of these subtle changes in regioselection as a
function of substrate structure remains to be defined.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge financial support of this work by
the National Institutes of Health (GM80266 and GM80266-S1).