P. McGurk et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 2231–2234
2233
HO
O
HO
O
BnO
O
20g scale
OH
HO
BnO
i,ii
OH
OH
OH
HO
(refs 10,11)
OH
OBn
NH2
(2)
(1)
D-Glucosamine
iii
O
PhO P O
PhO
BnO
BnO
O
O
O
BnO
O
v-vii
BnO
O
BnO
iv
P OEt
OEt
P OEt
OEt
I
OBn
OBn
OBn
(4)
(5)
(3)
vii, ix
O
PhO P O
PhO
O
-O P O
O
O
BnO
O
O
HO
O
O
O-
x
P O P O-
O- O-
P O P OPh
O- O-
OH
OBn
(6)
pACpp
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 5-phospho-a-
D
-arabinosyl-C-phosphonophosphate (pACpp). (i) TrCl, pyr (41%); (ii) NaH, BnBr, DMF;
TsOH, CH2Cl2/MeOH, 5:1 (82%, two steps); (iii) NIS, Ph3P, DMF (76%); (iv) P(OEt)3, D (83%); (v) conc. H2SO4, Ac2O; Na,
MeOH (81%, two steps); (vi) diphenylphosphoryl chloride, pyr (98%); (vii) TMS–Br, CH2Cl2 (quant.); (viii) carbonyldiimidazole,
DMF, phenylphosphate (44%); (ix) H2, Pd–C, AcOH; H2, PtO2, Pt–C, AcOH (46%, two steps).
Unfortunately a first attempt at the Arbuzov reaction,
using refluxing trimethyl phosphite, gave no conversion
of iodide 3 to the corresponding dimethylphosphonate,
ruling out direct comparison of subsequent synthetic
intermediates with McClard’s data.8,9† On switching to
the higher boiling triethyl phosphite, the Arbuzov
chemistry proceeded in good yield. The identity of the
diethylphosphonate 4 was supported by the appearance
of a characteristic signal at 28.2 ppm in the 31P NMR
spectrum and the observed couplings of H-1 and H-1%
(18.9 and 18.4 Hz), C-1 (137.5 Hz) and C-2 (7.5 Hz)
with phosphorus. Subsequent steps in the synthesis
followed the route described by McClard.9 Selective
acetolysis of the 6-O-benzyl group of 4 followed by
deacetylation resulted in the unmasking of the primary
alcohol, which was phosphorylated with diphenylphos-
1
phoryl chloride to give 5. In addition to H and 13C
NMR data, the appearance of a new signal at −13.0
ppm in the 31P NMR spectrum, characteristic of a
phosphate ester,14 confirmed the identity of the
product. Dealkylation of phosphonate 5 with bro-
motrimethylsilane and subsequent formation of the
phosphonophosphate, via activation with carbonyldi-
imidazole and coupling to phenyl phosphate, also pro-
†
Selected data: 2,5-Anhydro-3,4-di-O-benzyl-1-deoxy-1-diethylphos-
phono-6-O-diphenylphosphono-D-mannitol (5).
Amorphous solid (calcd for C36H42O10P2: C, 62.07; H, 6.08; found
C, 61.80; H, 6.35); lH (CDCl3), 1.27 (6H, dt, J 7.06, J 1.54,
ceeded
satisfactorily.
The
resulting
protected
2×CH3
JH,P 18.4, J1%,2 7.85, H-1%), 3.97–4.61 (14H, m, 2×CH3CH2
2×PhCH2 H-2,3,4,5,6,6%), 7.12–7.38 (20H, Ar); lC 16.3
(CH3CH2OP), 16.4 (CH3CH2OP), 61.6 (CH3CH2OP, JC,P 6.54),
61.9 (CH3CH2OP, JC,P 6.54), 68.1 (C-6, JC,P 6.60), 71.6 (PhCH2),
71.8 (PhCH2), 79.0 (C-3 or 4), 81.7 (C-5, JC,P 8.40), 84.3 (C-3 or 4),
6
CH2OP), 2.15 (1H, dd, JH,P 18.9, J1,2 6.4, H-1), 2.20 (1H, dd,
6
OP,
phosphonophosphate 6 gave rise to doublets in its 31P
NMR spectrum at 13.4 and −16.1 ppm, both with a
24.5 Hz P–P coupling, confirming formation of the
phosphonophosphate moiety. The phenyl and benzyl
groups in 6 were removed by catalytic hydrogenation,
which for no obvious reason required the sequential use
of palladium and platinum catalysts for maximum
efficiency.
6
,
6
6
6
6
6
6
85.8 (C-2, JC,P 7.95), 120.0–129.7 (Ar), 137.3 (quat. Ar), 137.5
(quat. Ar), 150.4 (quat. Ar), 150.5 (quat. Ar); lP (decoupled) 26.1
(phosphonyl), −13.0 (phosphoryl). Lit. for dimethylphosphonate,9
lP 30.22, −11.63.
5-Phospho-a-D-arabinosyl-C-phosphonophosphate (pACpp)
The stereospecific synthesis of the pACpp was success-
lH (D2O) 2.25 (2H, dd, J1&1%,P 18.7, J1,1% 7.0, H-1,1%), 3.98 (2H, m,
H-6,6%), 4.00–4.21 (4H, m, H-2,3,4,5); lC 28.9 (C1), 60.9 (C6), 74.0
(C4), 75.6 (C2), 77.3 (C3 or C5), 78.1 (C3 or C5); lP (decoupled)
14.3 (phosphonyl), 0.7 (phosphoryl), −10.6 (phosphoryl anhydride).
NMR data in accord with literature values.9 ES-MS: calcd for
C6H15O13P3: 387.9725, found [M−H]− 386.9650.
fully completed in 11 steps from readily available 2,5-
anhydro-D-mannitol in 3.4% overall yield. For
comparison, McClard’s synthesis9 required only seven
steps, but necessitated a difficult separation of three
polar compounds at the final stage.