ORGANIC
LETTERS
2011
Vol. 13, No. 5
1182–1185
Fluorescent Phosphane Selenide As
Efficient Mercury Chemodosimeter
†
‡
†
,†
ꢀ ꢀ
ꢀ
Issa Samb, Jeremy Bell, Patrick Y. Toullec, Veronique Michelet,* and
Isabelle Leray*,‡
E.N.S.C.P., Chimie ParisTech, UMR 7223, Laboratoire Charles Friedel 11 rue P. et M.
Curie, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France, and PPSM, ENS Cachan, CNRS, 61, avenue du
ꢀ
President Wilson 94230 Cachan, France
veronique-michelet@chimie-paristech.fr; icmleray@ppsm.ens-cachan.fr
Received January 10, 2011
ABSTRACT
The synthesis and photophysical properties of a novel fluorescent sensor are described. The phosphorus-selenium moiety allowed a selective
mercury salt complexation, followed by the formation of phosphane oxide, which leads to a turn-on of the fluorescence. The sensibility and
selectivity toward mercury cations were evaluated (0.18 ppb) and found to be in complete adequation with the targeted level of the World Health
Organization, which makes the dye an efficient dosimeter for mercury cations.
Heavy metal ions such as mercury represent highly toxic
pollutants to the environment and are extremely danger-
ous for human health.1 A wide variety of symptoms
including digestive, cardiac, kidney, and especially neuro-
logical diseases result from a series of biological effects.1,2
Thus, the level of this detrimental ion is the object of
several official norms; the World Health Organization
established in 2004 a guideline for drinking water quality
developed, the development of new, inexpensive, and real-
time monitoring methods for the detection of Hg2þ still
instigates interest. In this context, optical methods based
on chromogenic and fluorogenic molecular chemosen-
sors have attracted ever increasing attention.4 The chalco-
genophilicity of mercury5 has been extensively exploited by
(4) (a) Valeur, B.; Leray, I. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 3–40. (b)
Nolan, E. M.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3443–3480. (c)
deSilva, A. P.; Gunaratne, H. Q. N.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Huxley,
A. J. M.; McCoy, C. P.; Rademacher, J. T.; Rice, T. E. Chem. Rev.
1997, 97, 1515–1566. (d) Nolan, E. M.; Lippard, S. J. Chem. Rev. 2008,
108, 3443–3480. (e) Leray, I.; Valeur, B. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 3525–
3535.
which included a mercury maximal value of 1 μg L-1 3
.
Whereas a wide set of analytical methods including induc-
3
tively coupled plasma spectroscopy, atomic absorption,
atomic emission, and electrochemical detection have been
(5) Melnik, J. G.; Yurkervich, K.; Parkin, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 647–655.
† E.N.S.C.P., Chimie ParisTech.
‡ PPSM, ENS Cachan.
(6) For selected examples of fluorescent chemodosensors exploiting
the thiophilicity of mercury, see: (a) J Ros-Lis, J. V.; Marcos, M. D.;
Martinez-Manez, R.; Rurack, K.; Soto, J. Angew. Chem. 2005, 44, 4405–
4407. (b) Yang, Y.-K.; Yook, K.-J.; Tae J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
16760–16761. (c) Liu, B.; Tian, H. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3156–3158. (d)
Song, K. C.; Kim, J. S.; Park, S. M.; Chung, K. C.; Ahn, S.; Chang, S. K.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3413–3416. (e) Shi, W.; Ma, H. M. Chem. Commun.
2008, 1856–1858. (f) Lee, M. H.; Lee, S. W.; Kim, S. H.; Kang, C.; Kim,
J. S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2101–2104. (g) Tian, M. Q.; Ihmels, H. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 3175–3177. (h) Yoon, S.; Albers, A. E.; Wong, A. P.;
Chang, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16030–16031. Lin, W. Y.; Cao,
X. W.; Ding, Y. D.; Yuan, L.; Long, L. L. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46,
3529–3531.
(1) (a) Hutchinson, T. C.; Meena, K. M. In Lead, Mercury, Cadmium
and Arsenic in the Environment; John Wiley: New York, 1987. (b) Scoullos,
G. H.; Vonkeman, M. J.; Thorton, L.; Makuch, Z. In Mercury, Cadmium,
Lead: Handbook for Sustainable Heavy Metals Policy and Regulation
(Environment and Policy, V. 31); Kluwer Academic: Norwell, MA, 2001.
(c) Koester, C. J.; Moulik, A. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 3737–3754. (d)
Richardson, S. D.; Temes, T. A. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 3807–3838.
(2) (a) Clarkson, T. W.; Magos, L.; Myers, G. J. N. Engl. J. Med.
2003, 349, 1731–1737. (b) Carvalho, C. M. L.; Chew, E.-H.; Hashemy,
S. I.; Lu, J.; Holmgren, A. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 11913.
(3) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 3rd ed.; World Health Orga-
nization: Geneva, 2004; p 188.
r
10.1021/ol200066p
Published on Web 02/09/2011
2011 American Chemical Society