use stoichiometric amounts of a chiral reagent or auxiliary
to set the absolute stereochemistry of the natural product.
In contrast, asymmetric catalysis has only occasionally
been used to control the absolute configuration in apha-
norphine syntheses.2b,2g,3b,5 In these instances, the stereo-
center was generated via reduction or desymmetrization of
a prochiral starting material.
to that used in three prior aphanorphine syntheses.4b,10 As
shown in Scheme 1, the catalyst-controlled asymmetric
Pd-catalyzed carboamination reaction of racemic sub-
strate 5 could be used to set the C2 stereocenter of
pyrrolidines 6a,b, thereby providing a mixture of enantio-
merically enriched diastereomers. This mixture of diaster-
eomers would then be converted to one product (8) in a
FriedelꢀCrafts alkylation reaction, which would proceed
via intermediate carbocation 7, and would generate the all-
carbon quaternary stereocenter in an enantioconvergent
CꢀC bond-forming step.11 A two-step sequence of reduc-
tion and demethylation could then be employed to trans-
form 8 to aphanorphine.
Scheme 1. Asymmetric Carboamination/FriedelꢀCrafts Alky-
lation Strategy
The enantioconvergent strategy outlined above has
several attractive features: (a) the substrate required for
the asymmetric carboamination reaction could be pre-
pared in a concise, straightforward manner; (b) analogues
of the natural product could potentially be generated
through use of different aryl halides in the carboamination
step; (c) either enantiomer of the natural product should be
accessible, as the absolute stereochemistry in the carboa-
mination reaction would be controlled by the ligand; and
(d) this general strategy could potentially be adapted to
provide access to a broad array of fused- or bridged
bicyclic alkaloids that contain a benzylic all-carbon qua-
ternary stereocenter.
To test the feasibility of this strategy, we elected to
pursue a synthesis of the non-natural (þ)-enantiomer of
aphanorphine; only a few prior studies have targeted (þ)-
aphanorphine,4 and the ligand needed to generate this
compound, (R)-Siphos-PE,12 is commercially available.13
In order to obtain 8 in high ee it would be necessary to
generate a 1:1 mixture of diastereomers in the asymmetric
carboamination of (()-5, as any degree of substrate con-
trol in the reaction of (()-5 would lead to erosion of
enantiomeric purity in the final product. However, prior
studies have illustrated that diastereoselectivities are gen-
erally low in Pd-catalyzed carboamination reactions of
substrates bearing a single homoallylic substituent,14 and
the similarity in size of the homoallylic groups in (()-5
(methyl vs OTMS) suggested that there would be little
We sought to explore an alternative, catalytic enantio-
convergent route to the construction of aphanorphine,
which could also potentially provide access to other inter-
esting bicyclic alkaloids.6 Enantioconvergent transforma-
tions or strategies have significant potential synthetic
utility, as they effect the conversion of both enantiomers
of a racemic starting material to a single enantiomerically
enriched product.7,8 We envisioned that a simple racemic
starting material could be converted to enantiomerically
enriched aphanorphine through use of two key transfor-
mations: an enantioselective Pd-catalyzed carboamination
reaction that was recently developed in our laboratory9
and an intramolecular FriedelꢀCrafts ring closure similar
(6) One prior synthesis of (ꢀ)-aphanorphine employed an enantio-
convergent strategy in which a racemic intermediate was transformed to
an enantiopure intermediate via lipase-catalyzed resolution followed by
a subsequent Wharton rearrangement. This synthesis afforded the
natural product in 23 steps (longest linear sequence) from commercially
available materials. See: Shimizu, M.; Kamikubo, T.; Ogasawara, K.
Heterocycles 1997, 46, 21–26.
(11) For examples of enantioconvergent processes that generate
CꢀC bonds, see: (a) Mohr, J. T.; Behenna, D. C.; Harned, A. M.; Stoltz,
B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6924–6927. (b) Trost, B. M.;
Crawley, M. L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2921–2943.
(12) (R)-Siphos-PE = (11aR)-(þ)-10,11,12,13-tetrahydrodiindeno-
[7,1-de:10,70-fg][1,3,2]dioxaphosphocin-5-bis[(R)-1-phenylethyl]amine:
(7) For recent reviews on enantioconvergent synthesis, see: (a) Turner,
N. J. In Asymmetric Organic Synthesis with Enzymes; Gotor, V., Alfonso, I.,
Garcia-Urdiales, E., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2008; pp 115ꢀ132. (b)
Mohr, J. T.; Ebner, D. C.; Stoltz, B. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5,
€
3571–3576. (c) Huerta, F. F.; Minidis, A. B. E.; Backvall, J.-E. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2001, 30, 321–331. (d) Strauss, U. T.; Felfer, U.; Faber, K. Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 107–117.
(8) For selected recent examples of enantioconvergent strategies in
natural product syntheses, see: (a) Bender, C. F.; Yoshimoto, F. K.;
Paradise, C. L.; De Brabander, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
11350–11352. (b) Petrova, K. V.; Mohr, J. T.; Stoltz, B. M. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 293–295. (c) Ueberbacher, B. J.; Osprian, I.; Mayer, S. F.;
Faber, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1266–1270. (d) Fehr, C.; Galindo, J.;
Etter, O. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 1953–1957. (e) Yoshida, N.;
Ogasawara, K. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1461–1463. (f) Ducray, P.; Rousseau,
B.; Mioskowski, C. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 3800–3801.
(13) The compound sold as (S)-Siphos-PE is not the enantiomer of
(R)-Siphos-PE, but is instead a diastereomer with the opposite config-
uration of the spirocyclic bis-phenoxide moiety but the same configura-
tion of the bis(phenethyl)amide group.
(14) (a) Ney, J. E.; Wolfe, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
3605–3608. (b) Bertrand, M. B.; Wolfe, J. P. Tetrahedron 2005, 61,
6447–6459. (c) Jepsen, T. H.; Larsen, M.; Nielsen, M. B. Tetrahedron
2010, 66, 6133–6137.
(9) Mai, D. N.; Wolfe, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 12157–12159.
(10) (a) Zhai, H.; Luo, S.; Ye, C.; Ma, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
8268–8271. (b) Hu, H.; Zhai, H. Synlett 2003, 2129–2130.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 11, 2011
2933