Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 648–652.
with the silicon atom, and cleave the silicon–oxygen bond of 7. having no hydrogen at the α-position, such as 1f. Further studies
However, in the present reaction system, intermediate 8 would to elucidate the mechanism of this reaction and to extend the
prefer to act as a base and abstract a proton, Ha, from the α-po- scope of synthetic utility are underway.
sition rather than attack the silyl group as a nucleophile, prob-
References
ably due to steric and electronic reasons. For these reasons,
deprotonation of 7 occurs to give the product 3 together with 4
as a final leaving compound.
3. Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 2063–2192.
On the other hand, in the case of reactions with silyl enol ethers
4. Gawronski, J.; Wascinska, N.; Gajewy, J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108,
having a proton, Hb, at the α’-position, compound 9 might be
produced through the deprotonation of Hb by 8. However, such
products were not obtained in any of the examples studied.
These results imply that isomerism from 9 to 3 would occur
during the reaction. Thus, compound 1e was prepared according
to a known procedure and treated with the gold catalyst at
100 °C for 2 h (Scheme 3). As expected, the isomerization of
the double bond occurred and 3a was obtained in 80% yield.
This result shows that the indirect pathway from 7 to 3 via
deprotonation of Hb is also possible. In addition, it was found
that the reaction of 1f, having no hydrogen at the α-position,
proceeded smoothly and α,α-dialkyl silyl enol ether 3g was
obtained in good yield (Scheme 4). Obviously, this result
supports the possibility of the indirect pathway.
5. Chan, T. H.; Paterson, I.; Pinsonnault, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18,
6. Reetz, M. T.; Maier, W. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1978, 17,
7. Paterson, I.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 995–998.
8. Paterson, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 1519–1520.
9. Takagaki, H.; Yasuda, N.; Asaoka, M.; Takei, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
10.Paterson, I.; Fleming, I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 2179–2182.
11.Reetz, M. T.; Hüttenhain, S.; Walz, P.; Löwe, U. Tetrahedron Lett.
12.Jefford, C. W.; Sledeski, A. W.; Lelandais, P.; Boukouvalas, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 1855–1858.
13.Angers, P.; Canonne, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 367–370.
14.Nishibayashi, Y.; Wakiji, I.; Ishii, Y.; Uemura, S.; Hidai, M.
15.Matsuda, I.; Wakamatsu, S.; Komori, K.-i.; Makino, T.; Itoh, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1043–1046.
16.Zhan, Z.-p.; Cai, X.-b.; Wang, S.-p.; Yu, J.-l.; Liu, H.-j.; Cui, Y.-y.
17.Rubenbauer, P.; Bach, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1305–1309.
Scheme 3: Gold-catalyzed isomerism of silyl enol ether.
18.Asao, N.; Aikawa, H.; Tago, S.; Umetsu, K. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
19.Umetsu, K.; Asao, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7046–7049.
20.Aikawa, H.; Tago, S.; Umetsu, K.; Haginiwa, N.; Asao, N. Tetrahedron
21.Jean, M.; Renault, J.; van de Weghe, P.; Asao, N. Tetrahedron Lett.
22.Wada, M.; Nishihara, Y.; Akiba, K.-y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
23.Magnus, P.; Mugrage, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 462–464.
Scheme 4: Gold-catalyzed alkylation of tetra-substituted silyl enol
ether.
In conclusion, we have developed an unprecedented alkylation
method for silyl enol ethers, using a gold catalyst and ortho-
alkynylbenzoic acid esters as alkylating agents. The reaction
probably proceeds through the gold-induced in situ construc-
tion of a leaving group and subsequent nucleophilic attack on
the silyl enol ether. Unlike ordinary leaving groups, such as
halide ions, the generated leaving compound 8 acts as a base
and abstracts a proton to regenerate the silyl enol ether struc-
ture. The current protocol can also be used with substrates
24.Maruoka, K.; Concepcion, A. B.; Hirayama, N.; Yamamoto, H.
25.Magnus, P.; Coldham, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 672–673.
26.Tanino, K.; Takahashi, M.; Murayama, K.; Kuwajima, I. J. Org. Chem.
27.Mikami, K.; Matsukawa, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7039–7040.
651