192
E. We˛glarz-Tomczak et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 117 (2016) 187e196
measured Ki values are consistent with the literature data for
compounds 1a-d, 1f, 1h, 1i and 1m [12] and do not differ by more
than 25%, the original number is given; otherwise, both are
included). For SsAPN, a much broader tolerance to different sub-
stitutions is visible. The majority of the studied inhibitors show a
dissociation constant below 10
mM, with the newly synthesized
cycloheptyl derivative 1g being the most potent (Ki ¼ 0.5
m
M).
Far more impressive data in terms of the inhibition constant
value were collected for human alanine aminopeptidase. Several
aliphatic compounds display Ki below 1 m
M, being equally (N0-n-
propyl, 1c, N0-cyclohexyl, 1h, and N0-cycloheptyl, 1i) or more active
(N0-n-hexyl, 1e, Ki ¼ 0.3
mM) than for the highly homologic porcine
APN. Significantly, arylalkyl residues are much better accepted for
human than for pig APN. N0-Benzyl, 1n, N0-(
and N0-(4-methoxybenzyl), 1s, displayed strong inhibition, with Ki
values falling in a submicromolar range (all values below 0.4 M).
a-methylbenzyl), 1o,
m
The higher homolog of the last compound (N0-2-(4-
methoxyphenyl)ethyl, 1u) appeared to be the most potent com-
pound found in this study (Ki ¼ 65 nM). To the best of our knowl-
edge, it is the most active amino acid analogue inhibitor of HsAPN
reported to date. To discuss the presumed binding mode and the
reasons for the potency of selected compounds, molecular
modeling studies were performed. The crystal structure of alanyl
aminopeptidase from H. sapiens [26] was used to dock the ligand
and analyze the interactions. The HsAPN-1u complex (Fig. 3) shows
a typical pattern of contacts of the ligand NeCeP fragment with the
enzyme, similar to those described above for NmAPN, namely, the
involvement of two PeO oxygen atoms in Zn complexation and the
Fig. 3. A model of the complex of N0-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]-1,2-
diaminoalkylphosphonic acid (1u) with HsAPN showing P1eS1 interactions. Intra-
and intermolecular hydrogen bonds and ligand-metal interactions are marked in
green.
for the other two APNs. The much more potent N0-[2-(4-
methoxyphenyl)-ethyl]-1,2-diaminoalkylphosphonic acid (1u) is
also at least 10-fold more active for HsAPN than for the alanyl
aminopeptidase of other organisms.
The selectivity ratio between the APNs and LAP is indeed sig-
nificant.
In
general,
N0-alkyl-
and
N0-cyclo-
alkyldiaminoethylphosphonic acids do not inhibit (up to 800
inhibitor concentration) or poorly inhibit porcine kidney leucine
aminopeptidase, whereas they appear to be quite active for APNs
m
M
ion pairing/hydrogen bonding of the
glutamine (Glu355, Glu414 and Gln213). Interestingly, the
a
-amino with glutamates/
-amino
b
group adapt a conformation similar to that evidenced in the crystal
structure of the N0-benzyl-1,2-diaminoalkylphosphonic acid-
NmAPN complex. The group is exposed externally out of the S1
enzyme cavity and tentatively linked with the solved-aimed oxy-
gen atom via an intramolecular hydrogen bond. The (4-
methoxyphenyl)ethyl fragment fits particularly well to the S1
binding site, filling it very tightly (Fig. 3 and Graphical Abstract).
The aromatic ring is surrounded by the phenyl of Phe348 (edge to
face) and the amide groups of Gln211 and Asn350. The electron-rich
character of the aromatic ring definitely improves the contacts with
the neighboring residues. The ether oxygen atom is in proximity to
the N-terminal amide NeH of Asn350, but the potential hydrogen
bonding can be a vague suggestion because of a not favored ge-
ometry. Suggestion of the interaction between the inhibitor oxygen
atom of OMe and the side-chain amide NH2 group of Asn350 seems
to be more justified for compound 1s, a methylene group shorter
homolog of 1u. The high activity of inhibitor 1s (Ki ¼ 357 nM) can
be attributed to this specific bond (Fig. S3) as the overall P1eS1 fit is
not so perfectly tight as modeled for 1u. The latter statement is also
valid for the N0-2-phenylethyl substituent of 1q, lacking OMe group
compared to 1u (Fig. S4), which gives rise to a moderate inhibitory
potency. To conclude, the length and character of the N0-2-(4-
methoxyphenyl)ethyl portion can be considered optimal to bind
to the S1 pocket of HsAPN.
(Ki ~ 1 mM). The cyclohexyl derivative 1h is the most significant
example. It is a low micromolar inhibitor of three alanyl amino-
peptidases and does not influence the LAP activity at all. In this and
similar instances, the selectivity ratio can be estimated to be three
orders of magnitude. When the effect of LAP inhibition is measur-
able, the ratio is typically 1.5e2 orders of magnitude (compare, for
example, the Ki values found for compound 1e: 1.1
mM for NmAPN,
1.2 M for SsAPN and 0.3 M for HsAPN versus 119 m
m
m
M for LAP).
Only individual compounds (arylalkyl) show somewhat significant
affinity toward LAP. Among them, the N0-4-aminobenzyl analogue
(1k) can be considered a universal inhibitor of aminopeptidases,
with all the Ki values between 2.5 and 7.0 mM.
2.3. Synthesis and activity of 1,2-diaminoethylphosphinic-derived
dipeptides
In continuation, we undertook an effort to adapt the optimized
protocols of obtaining and opening the corresponding aziridine
system for a suitable phosphinic dipeptide precursor. Such a
building block should contain an appropriate P10 fragment. The
aromatic ring of the benzyl-derived portion is favorably bound in a
shallow and hydrophobic S10 cleft [27], so we selected unsaturated
compound 16 and aziridine 18 (Scheme 2) as the target scaffolds.
The synthetic challenge to prepare vinylphosphinate 16 involves a
Discussing the selectivity issues between APNs from different
sources, several interesting discrimination cases can be observed.
For example, unsubstituted derivative 1a clearly favors binding to
NmAPN. The difference in inhibition constants is approximately 5-
fold to porcine and 20-fold to human enzyme. The opposite cases
(mammalian APNs versus the bacterial one) are even more pro-
nounced. For example, compound 1d (N0-isopropyl) exhibits over
an order of magnitude higher potency in favor of SsAPN and HsAPN
than NmAPN. Certain inhibitors preferentially bind to only the
multistep approach starting from methyl
a-benzylacrylate 12
[28,29]. Diethyl phosphite was readily added to the acrylate in a
phospha-Michael reaction under strong base catalysis [30] to
obtain 13. The triester was selectively monodealkylated with NaI in
acetone [31] to the mixed diester 14. Subsequently, the phosphonic
monoacid function was converted into the corresponding chlor-
idate 15 by thionyl chloride [32]. Without preparative separation,
phosphonochloridate was reacted with vinylmagnesium chloride
[33], the Grignard compound, to form the demanded vinyl-to-
phosphorus portion. The following steps of the procedure were
human ortholog. The N0-
guishes human aminopeptidase, with Ki ¼ 0.4
a
-methylbenzyl (1o) derivative distin-
M versus Ki ¼ 15
m
mM