Table 1. Reaction Optimizationa
Scheme 2. Reaction of N-Tosylhydrazones with Arynes: Dif-
ferent Mechanisms Leading to the Same Indazoles
TEBAC
t
time
(h)
yield
(%)b
entry
Fꢀ
(mol %)
solvent
(°C)
1
CsF
CsF
TBAF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
CsF
0
0
MeCN
MeCN
THF
50
80
rt
16
6
45
51
0
38c
37
0
2
3
0
24
24
10
10
24
6
4
0
THF
70
85
105
90
80
70
90
70
70
5
0
DME
dioxane
THF
6
0
7
0
38
50
61
58
77
87
8
10
10
10
10
25
MeCN
THF
and Cs2CO3,12 are often used, the fluoride used for the in situ
generation of arynes from o-(trimethylsilyl)aryl triflates
should be sufficiently basic to generate diazo compounds
from N-tosylhydrazones in situ (Scheme 2, path A).13
From a mechanistic point of view, even if this in situ
generation of diazo compounds does not occur for what-
ever reasons, the formal [3 þ 2] annulation of arynes
through the conjugate bases of the N-tosylhydrazones
(Scheme 2, path B) looks equally promising.
Thus, we examinedthe reactionof anisaldehydeN-tosyl-
hydrazone (2a) with the benzyne precursor 1a under
various reaction conditions (Table 1). Three equivalents
of fluoride were employed in this reaction to provide suffi-
cient base for generation of the tosylhydrazone anion.
Upon initial screening (entries 1ꢀ4), we found that CsF
was the best fluoride source, and THF and acetonitrile
were both suitable solvents. However, we noticed that the
reaction quickly formed large amounts of a precipitate,
likely the Cs salt of the conjugate base of 2a, that inhibited
efficient stirring of the reaction. Although heating the
reaction mixture to increase the solubility led to a higher
yield in acetonitrile (compare entries 1 and 2), it failed to
improve the yield in ethereal solvents (entries 4ꢀ7). Under
these reaction conditions, the reaction afforded a complex
9
24
24
24
24
10
11d
12d
THF
THF
THF
a All reactions were carried out on 0.4 mmol of 2a in 5 mL of solvent.
TEBAC = [Et3NBn]Cl. b Isolated yield. c Incomplete conversion; 59%
of 2a recovered. d 10 mL of solvent were used.
mixture containing the desired product 3a, the product of
N-arylation of the hydrazone (the “side product” shown in
Scheme2), and phenylp-toluenesulfinatefrom the reaction
of Tsꢀ with benzyne. We next examined the effect of
adding a phase transfer catalyst14 to help dissolve the con-
jugate base of2a. Indeed, although the addition of 10 mol %
of TEBAC ([Et3NBn]þClꢀ) failed to improve the yield in
acetonitrile, itsignificantly increased the yield of3ainTHF
(compare entries 4 and 9, and 7 and 10). Further dilution
brought the yield up to 77% (entry 11), and increasing the
TEBAC to 25 mol % resulted in an 87% yield of 3a.15 To
our pleasant surprise, further N-arylation of 3a was minimal
under these reaction conditions, as opposed to the previous
diazo route.2
Having the optimal conditions in hand, we examined the
scopeand limitationsof thismethod. Different arynes were
tested first (Table 2, entries 1 and 2). The symmetrical
(7) Creary, X. Org. Synth. 1986, 64, 207.
(8) For a comprehensive review of processes generating diazo com-
pounds from N-tosylhydrazones, see: Fulton, J. R.; Aggarwal, V. K.; de
Vicente, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 1479.
(9) For the related BamfordꢀStevensꢀShapiro reaction, see: (a)
Nickon, A.; Zurer, P. S. J. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 4685. (b) Casanova,
J.; Waegell, B. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr. 1975, 922. (c) Nickon, A.;
Bronfenbrenner, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2022.
(10) (a) Taber, D. F.; Guo, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 9479. (b) Wu,
L.; Shi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2296.
(14) In situ generation of diazo compounds from N-tosylhydrazones
is often performed in the presence of phase transfer catalysts; see: (a)
Aggarwal, V. K.; de Vicente, J.; Bonnert, R. V. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
5381. (b) Aggarwal, V. K.; Fulton, J. R.; Sheldon, C. G.; de Vicente, J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6034. (c) Aggarwal, V. K.; Patel, M.;
Studley, J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1514. (d) Aggarwal, V. K.; Alonso, E.;
Bae, I.; Hynd, G.; Lydon, K. M.; Palmer, M. J.; Patel, M.; Porcelloni,
M.; Richardson, J.; Stenson, R. A.; Studley, J. R.; Vasse, J. L.; Winn,
C. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10926. (e) Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ling, L.;
Li, Y.; Dong, Y.; Gong, M.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 4330.
(15) Typical procedure (entry 12, Table 1): to an oven-dried 25 mL
round-bottom flask equipped with a stir bar were added 122 mg of 2a
(0.4 mmol), followed by 143 mg of 1a (0.48 mmol). THF (10 mL) was
added, followed by 23 mg of TEBAC (0.1 mmol) and 182 mg of CsF (1.2
mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 70 °C for 24 h, cooled to
room temperature, poured into brine, and extracted with EtOAc. The
combined extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated. The
residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/
EtOAc = 2:1) to afford 78 mg of 3a (87%) as a white solid.
(11) (a) Zhou, L.; Ye, F.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 13590. (b) Xiao, Q.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.
ꢀ
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4732. (c) Barluenga, J.; Moriel, P.; Valdes, C.; Aznar,
F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5587. (d) Zhao, X.; Lu, K.; Zhang,
Y.; Wang, J. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1724. (e) Zhao, X.; Wu, G.;
Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3296.
(12) (a) Xiao, Q.; Xia, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1114. (b) Zhou, L.; Shi, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ye, F.;
Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 968.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(13) Barluenga, J.; Tomas-Gamasa, M.; Aznar, F.; Valdes, C. Nat.
Chem. 2009, 1, 494.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 13, 2011
3341