Detailed examination of the chirality of these compounds
over the past decade has revealed that these inherently chiral
furanones can be separable by recent chiral GC,5,6a-c CE,6d,7
and HPLC6e techniques. Moreover, it has been shown that
enzymatic reaction can produce enantiomerically enriched
1 followed by spontaneous racemization in only a few hours
depending on their pH conditions.7
Table 1. Specific Optical Rotation Value, Enantiomeric Excess,
and Odor Evaluation of Each Enantiomer
eeb
[%]
a
20
[R]D
odor evaluation
(+)-1
(-)-1
(+)-2
(-)-2
+172
-153
+148
-188
80 obviously strong, sugary, jammy, sweet
82 extremely weak
94 burnt, intensive caramel
However, attempts to determine absolute configurations
of the compounds have not been successful due to rapid
racemization through the keto-enol tautomerism and ex-
traordinary chemical reactivity of the enol and carbonyl
groups obstructing their derivatization toward an X-ray
crystallographic study and a standard Mosher method.
Consequently, we applied the vibrational circular dichroism
(VCD) technique to more stable methyl ether 2 (DMMF).
VCD measures differential absorption of left-versus-right
circularly polarized IR radiation by molecular vibrational
transitions, which have both advantages of CD and IR
features.8 VCD is an emerging reliable technique for
stereochemical analyses in the field of life sciences as well
as material sciences in combination with DFT theoretical
calculation. Herein, we report the absolute configurations of
these unique molecules, which have remained unclear for
the past 40 years since their isolation.9
91 lactone, coumarin like, no caramelic odor
a (+)-1: (c 0.472, CCl4), (-)-1: (c 0.526, CCl4), (+)-2: (c 0.324, CCl4),
(-)-2: (c 0.262, CCl4). b Determined by the chiral GC.
phase HPLC.10 After several trials, efficient optical separation
of 1 and 2 was achieved by the use of CHIRALPAK IA
with chiral stationary phase using 2-propanol (1: R ) 1.12,
2: R ) 1.22).11 Semipreparative scale chromatography with
multiple injections gave approximately 30 mg of each
enantiomer. The afforded enantiomers had specific optical
rotation values shown in Table 1. The enantiomeric ratio
was determined by chiral GC with a Chirasildex CB
column.11 No racemization was observed during the workup
such as collection of fractions and evaporation of solvent.
The IR and VCD spectra of each enantiomer were
measured on a commercial Fourier transform VCD spec-
trometer as CCl4 solution through a 100-µm path length cell
with CaF2 windows.11 Unfortunately, 1 was decomposed
during measurement because of its low stability in CDCl3
and CCl4, whereas enantiomers of its methyl ether (2) showed
entirely opposite VCD signals. An enantiomer (+)-2 showed
a strong positive Cotton effect at around 1300 cm-1 attribut-
able to C-H bending at the chiral center.
The IR and VCD spectra of 2 were theoretically calculated
based on the density functional theory at the B3PW91/
6-31G(d,p) level of theory. Conformational analysis offered
a sole stable conformer for 2 in which the methoxy group
was rotated (Figure 1).
Optical resolution of 1 and 2 was efficiently performed
by an environmental friendly CO2 supercritical fluid chro-
matography (SFC) chiral separation technique with normal-
(6) (a) Dietrich, A.; Maas, B.; Messer, W.; Bruche, G.; Karl, V.;
Kaunzinger, A.; Mosandl, A. J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1992, 15, 590–
593. (b) Bruche, G.; Dietrich, A.; Mosandl, A. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch
1995, 201, 249–252. (c) Fischer, N.; Hammerschmidt, F.-J. Chem. Mikro-
biol. Technol. Lebensm. 1992, 14, 141–148. (d) Raab, T.; Schmitt, U.;
Hauck, T.; Knecht, A.; Holzgrabe, U.; Schwab, W. Chromatographia 2003,
57, 501–504. (e) Bruche, G.; Mosandl, A.; Kinkel, J. N. J. High Resolut.
Chromatogr. 1993, 16, 254–257
(7) Raab, T.; Hauck, T.; Knecht, A.; Schmitt, U.; Holzgrabe, U.; Schwab,
W. Chirality 2003, 15, 573–578
.
.
(8) (a) Keiderling, T. A. In Circular Dichroism: Principles and
Applications; Berova, N., Nakanishi, K., Woody, R. W. Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
New York, 2000; pp 621-666. (b) Freedman, T. B.; Cao, X.; Dukor, R. K.;
Nafie, L. A. Chirality 2003, 15, 743–758. (c) Polavarapu, P. L.; He, J. Anal.
Chem. 2004, 76, 61A–67A. (d) Taniguchi, T.; Miura, N.; Nishimura, S.-I.;
Monde, K. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2004, 48, 246–254. (e) Nafie, L. A.; Dukor,
R. K. In Chiral Analysis; Busch, K. W., Busch, M. A., Eds.; Elsevier:
Amsterdam, 2006; pp 505-544. (f) Taniguchi, T.; Monde, K. Trends
Glycosci. Glycotech. 2007, 19, 149–166. (g) Kellenbach, E. R.; Dukor, R. K.;
Nafie, L. A. Spectrosc. Eur. 2007, 19, 15–17. (h) Polavarapu, P. L. Chem.
Rec. 2007, 7, 125–136. (i) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Pan, J.-J. Chirality
2008, 20, 643–663.
Figure 1. Most stable conformer of (R)-2.
After harmonic vibrational analysis, simulated absorption
and VCD spectra were obtained by using convolution with
Lorentzian functions with 8 cm-1 full width at half-height.
(9) (a) Willhalm, B.; Stoll, M.; Thomas, A. F. Chem. Ind. London 1965,
38, 1629–1630. (b) Rodin, J. O.; Himel, C. M.; Silverstein, R. M.; Leeper,
R. W.; Gortner, W. A. J. Food Sci. 1965, 30, 280–285.
(10) (a) Terfloth, G. J. Chromatogr., A 2001, 906, 301–307. (b) Phinney,
K. W. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2005, 382, 639–645.
(11) See Supporting Information.
4884
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 21, 2008