JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
ARTICLE
6 L. Ye, S. Zhang, W. Zhao, H. Yao, J. Hou, Chem. Mater. 2014,
26, 3603–3605.
PQx blend film (Fig. 5). A smaller phase separation increases
the total area for charge separation between the donor poly-
mer and the PCBM acceptor, and leads to a higher photocur-
rent and a higher efficiency. Relatively high levels of phase
separation are evident in the PQx:PC70BM blend film, which
is likely to decrease the photocurrent density.
7 J. Hou, Z. Tan, Y. Yan, Y. He, C. Yang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 4911.
8 P. M. Beaujuge, J. M. J. Frechet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011,
133, 20009.
9 E. Perzon, F. Zhang, M. Andersson, W. Mammo, O. A.
Inganas, M. R. Andersson, Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3308–3311.
The EQE values of the PQx and PphQx solar cell devices
were measured to evaluate their photo-responses as a func-
tion of wavelength, and are shown in Figure 6. The PQx and
PphQx devices yield EQE plots that are similar to their UV–
visible absorption spectra, which indicate that their excitons
are mainly generated in the polymer phase (Fig. 1). The Jsc
values calculated by integrating the EQE curves were found
to be within 10% of the corresponding Jsc values obtained
from the J–V curves. The spectral response of the PQx:PCBM
(1:2) device shows that photons with wavelengths in the
range 350–800 nm contribute significantly to the EQE, with
a maximum EQE of 50% at 500 nm. The PphQx:PCBM (1:2)
device exhibits a similar spectral response in the range 350–
800 nm; however, a maximum EQE of 62% was obtained at
400 nm, which results in a much higher Jsc.
10 K. G. Jespersen, W. J. D. Beenken, Y. Zaushitsyn, A.
Yartsev, M. Andersson, T. Pullerits, V. Sundstrom, J. Chem.
Phys. 2004, 121, 12613–12617.
11 R. M. Duan, L. Ye, X. Guo, Y. Huang, P. Wang, S. Q. Zhang,
J. P. Zhang, H. H. Hou, Macromolecules 2012, 45, 3032–3038.
12 L. J. Lindgren, F. L. Zhang, M. Andersson, S. Barrau, S.
Hellstrom, S. W. Mammo, E. Perzon, O. Inganas, M. R.
Andersson, Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 3491.
13 E. J. Zhou, J. Z. Cong, K. Tajima, K. Hashimoto, Chem.
Mater. 2010, 22, 4890.
14 T. Yamamoto, K. Sugiyama, T. Kushida, T. Inoue, T.
Kanbara, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3930–3937.
15 Y. Zhang, J. Zou, H. L. Yip, K. S. Chen, D. F. Zeigler, Y. Sun,
A. K. Y. Jen, Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 2289–2291.
16 Y. J. Cheng, C. H. Chen, T. Y. Lin, C. S. Hsu, Chem. Asian J.
2012, 7, 818–825.
17 X. Zhang, J. W. Shim, S. P. Tiwari, Q. Zhang, J. E. Norton,
P. T. Wu, S. Barlow, S. A. Jenekhe, B. Kippelen, J. L. Bredasa,
S. R. Marder, J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 4971–4982.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, we have synthesized and characterized a new
phQx-based D–A polymer. We found that the soluble phQx
units in the polymer play a crucial role in its absorption
spectra, energy levels, charge transport, blend film morphol-
ogies, and photovoltaic properties. Our preliminary results
indicate that the tetra-alkoxy-substituted phQx acceptor unit
has significant potential as a new building block for conju-
gated polymers for OPVs.
18 Y. Lee, Y. M. Nam, W. H. Jo, J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21,
8583–8590.
19 Q. Bian, B. Zhao, H. Wu, T. Chen, C. Gao, W. Wei, Synth.
Met. 2015, 199, 329–334.
20 M. H. Petersen, O. Hagemann, K. T. Nielsen, M. Jørgensen,
F. C. Krebs, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 996–1009.
21 Y. Sun, C. Zhang, B. Dai, B. Lin, H. Yang, X. Zhang, L. Guo,
Y. Liu, Chemistry 2015, 53, 1915–1926.
22 J. Yang, Q. Hou, W. Yang, C. Zhang, Y. Cao, Macromole-
cules 2005, 38, 244–253.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
23 C. Kanimozhi, P. Balraju, G. D. Sharma, S. Patil, J. Phys.
Chem. B 2010, 114, 3095–3103.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01056899)
24 J. L. Bredas, D. Beljonne, V. Coropceanu, J. Cornil. Chem.
Rev. 2004, 104, 4971–5004.
25 S. Gunes, H. Neugebauer, N. S. Sariciftci, Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 1324–1338.
26 S. R. Amrutha, M. Jayakannan, J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112,
1119–1129.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1 R. R. Søndergaard, M. Hosel, F. C. Krebs, J. Polym. Sci. Part
B: Polym. Phys. 2013, 51, 16.
27 C. L. Gettinger, A. J. Heeger, J. M. Drake, D. J. Pine, Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cyst. 1994, 256, 507–512.
2 F. C. Krebs, Cells 2009, 93–394.
28 J. F. Rusling, S. L. Suib, Adv. Mater. 1994, 6, 922–930.
3 Y. Liu, J. Zhao, Z. Li, C. Mu, W. Ma, H. Hu, K. Jiang, H. Lin,
H. Ade, H. Yan, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5293.
29 R. Peverati, D. G. Truhlar, Phys. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2012,
14, 16187–16191.
4 J.-H. Kim, J. B. Park, I. H. Jung, A. C. Grimsdale, S. C. Yoon,
H. Yang, D.-H. Hwang, Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 2352–2356.
30 K. H. Kim, H. Kang, H. J. Kim, P. S. Kim, S. C. Yoon, B. Kim,
Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 2373.
5 S. Zhang, L. Ye, W. Zhao, D. Liu, H. Yao, J. Hou, Macromole-
cules 2014, 47, 4653–4659.
31 J. J. M. Halls, K. Pichler, R. H. Friend, S. C. Moratti, A. B.
Holmes, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 3120–3122.
WWW.MATERIALSVIEWS.COM
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2016, 00, 000–000
7