Communications
Meerwein rearrangement converted the tertiary cation into
the rearranged carbon skeleton of 15,[22] which was confirmed
by single-crystal X-ray analysis.[16]
To gain insight into the diverging behavior of 6-exo and 5-
exo terminated reactions, a computational analysis (DFT
B3LYP/6-31G*)[23] of the key 1,2-shifts was carried out on
simplified model systems (Scheme 3). Revealing was the
efficiently and diastereoselectively activates a single olefin
face.
In summary, we report the results of a platinum(II)-
mediated cyclization method that explores the boundaries of
polyalkene cation-olefin reactions. These data reinforce the
notion that the nucleophilicity/cation stability of the termi-
nating alkene is of paramount importance and the termina-
tion outcomes depend on structure. Electrophilic Pt dications
are also shown to be unique in their ability to activate and
mediate the cascade reactivity of polyene reactants. The
results pave the way to as of yet unknown catalytic
asymmetric cation-olefin cyclizations of polyalkenes.
Scheme 3. A comparison of the 6,5 (a) and 6,6 (b) energies (kcal
molÀ1) along the Wagner–Meerwein reaction coordinate.
differential activation energy for the initiating 1,2-hydride
shift, which was 7.3 kcalmolÀ1 more favorable for the 5-exo
terminated ring systems than for the 6-exo. The subsequent
steps were lower in energy, thus suggesting that it is the slower Experimental Section
Standard cyclization reaction: To 30 mg of [(PPP)PtI2] was added
initiating 1,2-hydrogen transfer in the 6,6 case which diverts
the reaction towards a competitive base-induced elimination.
Compound 1 was additionally investigated for its ability to
cyclize a squalene analogue that lacks the terminal methyl
groups [Eq. (3)]. Although the complexity of the spectra was
15 mg of AgBF4 followed by 0.75 mL of EtNO2. The mixture was then
stirred for 1 h in the dark. The contents were filtered through a 0.2 mm
PTFE syringe filter, washing out the flask and syringe with 0.25 mL
EtNO2, into a flask containing 2 equiv of substrate and 3 equiv of
piperidine resin. The reaction mixture was stirred in the dark until the
reaction was complete (3–48 h, verified by 31P NMR spectroscopy).
The reaction mixture was passed through a 0.2 mm PTFE syringe
filter, washing out the flask and syringe filter with 0.25 mL EtNO2.
Solvent was then removed under a stream of N2. The complex was
twice reconstituted in a minimum amount of CH2Cl2 and force
precipitated with cold tBuOMe. The mixture was centrifuged and the
solvent was decanted off. The crude residue was purified by flash
column chromatography on silica gel.
Received: January 19, 2011
Published online: May 5, 2011
significant and more than one isomer was formed, similarities
to 15 suggested that the cyclization followed a 6,6,5-exo
pathway to give a cation at C14, which nonselectively
rearranged akin to 4. Unlike cyclase enzymes, the environ-
ment of the terminating cation is not conducive to ring
expansion/D-ring annulation.[24,25] van Tamelen made similar
observations in Brønsted acid mediated reactions on squalene
oxide.[26]
The viability of performing an asymmetric cascade
cyclization was investigated using the chiral [P2PPt]2+ com-
plex (P2 = DTBM-SEGPHOS, P = PMe3) 19. The combina-
tion of a chiral P2 ligand and an achiral monodentate
phosphine has been previously shown to catalyze cyclo-
rearrangment reactions with high enantiomeric excess.[27]
When 19 was treated with 8 under the standard conditions
(Table 1), NMR spectroscopy indicated that a single stereo-
isomer was obtained (1H, 31P), i.e. the chiral initiator
Keywords: biomimetic synthesis · cascade cyclization ·
electrophilic activation · platinum
.
[1] a) K. U. Wendt, G. E. Schulz, E. J. Corey, D. R. Liu, Angew.
2812 – 2833; b) W. S. Johnson, Acc. Chem. Res. 1967, 1, 1 – 8;
c) P. A. Bartlett in Asymmetric Synthesis, Vol. 3 (Ed.: J. D.
Morrison), Academic Press, New York, 1984, pp. 341 – 409;
d) P. A. Bartlett in Asymmetric Synthesis, Vol. 3 (Ed.: J. D.
Morrison), Academic Press, New York, 1984, pp. 411 – 454.
[3] a) M. Uyanik, H. Ishibashi, K. Ishihara, H. Yamamoto, Org. Lett.
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5658 –5661