D. J. Rawson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3771–3773
3773
The compounds all showed good absorption. In common with
other 2d ligands these compounds exhibited low flux in Caco-2
cell monolayer model of oral absorption (Caco-2 A–B = 5, B–A <1
at 5 and 25
M for 16) consistent with their physicochemistry,11
however the low MW and polarity are features usually associated
with paracellular absorption. Unlike previous 2d ligands, the pro-
line-derived ligands showed a low affinity for the System amino
acid transporter12 (IC50 >25
M) and the high bioavailability ob-
The clearance of free drug of 16 in dog (0.4 ml/min/kg) was sig-
nificantly lower than glomerular filtration rate suggesting that ac-
tive renal reabsorption is occurring. The predicted human half-life
based on scaling of the dog pharmacokinetic profile was estimated
to be 26 h.
This compound has the potential to be a once daily oral treat-
ment for neuropathic pain with minimal centrally mediated side
effects and has been progressed into the clinic.13
a
l
a
L
l
served suggests that gut wall absorption is indeed paracellular
(although other amino acid transporters were not assessed and
can not be discounted).
Acknowledgment
The modulation of basic pKa (pKa = 8.9 for 4 and 10.1 for
16) appeared to be key to altering both the plasma protein
binding (PPB) and the extent of renal secretion in rat. The 4-
benzyl and 4-benzyloxyprolines (16, 19, and 20) consistently
showed reduced unbound clearance (in rat) compared to the
4-oxyproline derivatives (4 and 17). Within a series, increased
lipophilicity correlated with increased unbound clearance. The
unbound clearance (Clu) of 16 and 19 was consistent with
passive renal elimination resulting in improvements in half-life
(in contrast to 4 where active renal secretion results in a short
half-life).
Compound 16 showed very low CNS exposure in rat (CSF:free
plasma = 0.004) and was predicted to show low incidence of cen-
trally-mediated side effects in man.
The potency and low rat clearance of compound 16 encouraged
us to progress it to dog pharmacokinetic profiling (Fig. 1).
We thank the staff of the Structural and Analytical Services
Department, Sandwich, for analytical data.
References and notes
1. Dworkin, R. H.; Kirkpatrick, P. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2005, 4, 455.
2. Zareba, G. Drugs Today 2005, 41, 509.
3. (a) Rogers, L. C.; Armstrong, D. G. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 5, 14;
(b) Rice, A. S. C.; Maton, S. Pain 2001, 94, 215.
4. Bryans, J. S.; Wustrow, D. J. Med. Res. Rev. 1999, 19, 149.
5. Guay, D. R. P. Am. J. Geriatr. Pharmacother. 2005, 3, 274.
6. Gee, N. S.; Brown, J. P.; Dissanayake, V. U. K.; Offord, J.; Thurlow, R.; Woodruff,
G. N. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 5768.
7. Stahl, S. M. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2004, 65, 1033. and references therein.
8. Carlsen, P. H. J.; Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3936.
9. Determined by 400 MHz 1H NMR.
10. Experimental for Wittig reaction to convert 12 to 13.
To
a solution of m-fluorobenzyl triphenylphosphonium bromide (8.08 g,
0.018 mmol) in anhydrous dichloromethane (200 ml), was added potassium
t-butoxide (1 M in THF, 17.2 ml, 0.017 mmol) dropwise at room temperature
and stirred for 1 h. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C and to this was added a
solution of (2S)-4-oxo-pyrrolidine-1,2-dicarboxylic acid 1-tert butyl ester 2-
methyl ester (3.8 g, 0.016 mmol) in dichloromethane (20 ml) dropwise. The
mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 18 h. The reaction
was quenched with saturated ammonium chloride (100 ml), the aqueous
extracted with dichloromethane (2 Â 100 ml) and the combined organics dried
over magnesium sulfate. The solvent removed by evaporation under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel
eluting with a solvent gradient of heptane/ethyl acetate (4:1) to give the title
compound (3.48 g, 67%) as a colourless oil.
1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) (mixture of geometric isomers, cis and trans):
O = 1.44 (s, 10H), 1.50 (s, 8H), 2.79–2.94 (m, 2H), 3.20–3.37 (m, 2H), 3.66 (d,
3H), 3.72 (d, 3H), 4.20–4.38 (m, 4H), 4.42–4.48 (m, 1H), 4.52–4.60 (m, 1H),
6.42–6.51 (m, 2H), 6.89–7.10 (m, 6H), 7.30–7.40 (m, 2H).
LRMS (APCI): m/z [(M+H)–Boc] 236.
Microanalysis: found: C, 64.46; H, 6.77; N, 4.07. C18H22FN04, requires C, 64.46;
H, 6.61; N, 4.18.
11. Artursson, P. J. Pharm. Sci. 1990, 79, 476.
12. Su, T. Z.; Lunney, E.; Campbell, G.; Oxender, D. L. J. Neurochem. 1995, 64, 2125.
13. Results to be disclosed in future publications.
Figure 1. Dog pharmacokinetic profile following 0.5 mg/kg po dose.