L. Aurelio et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 3704–3707
3707
ric enhancers at the A1-AR. As a consequence the assumption that
increasing the cycloalkyl ring size to improve the allosteric effects
did not hold. Also, as evidenced by the AlphaScreen plate-based as-
say, that increased allosterism is accompanied by antagonism. It is
also evident that 3-benzoyl substitution is highly desirably and
that methyl or trifluoromethyl groups on the 3-benzoyl are bene-
ficial for the allosteric activity. All of the 2-aminothiophenes with
amide and hydrazide functionality in the 3-position proved to be
inactive in this functional assay.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Discovery grant DP0877497 of
the Australian Research Council, Program grant 519461 of the Na-
tional Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia.
Arthur Christopoulos is a Senior, and Patrick Sexton a Principal, Re-
search Fellow of the NHMRC. We are grateful to Dr Michael Crouch,
TGR Biosciences, Adelaide, for generously providing the ERK Sure-
Fire Alphascreen kit reagents.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (full experimental procedures including 1H
and 13C NMR data of compounds 5a–f, 7, 9 and 12a–j) associated
with this article can be found, in the online version, at
References and notes
1. Gao, Z.-G.; Kim, S.-K.; IJzerman, A. P.; Jacobson, K. A. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2005,
5, 545.
2. Baraldi, P. G.; Iaconinoto, M. A.; Moorman, A. R.; Carrion, M. D.; Cara, C. L.; Preti,
D.; López, O. C.; Fruttarolo, F.; Tabrizi, M. A.; Romagnoli, R. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem.
2007, 7, 559.
Figure 3. R-PIA mediated stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the absence or
presence of the indicated concentrations of test compounds in intact CHO FlpIn A1-
AR cells. Data represent the mean standard deviation of three experiments
conducted in duplicate. Curves drawn through the points represent the best global
fit of an allosteric model of ligand–receptor interaction.
3. La Motta, C.; Sartini, S.; Morelli, M.; Taliani, S.; Da Settimo, F. Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2010, 10, 976.
4. Bruns, R. F.; Fergus, J. H. Mol. Pharmacol. 1990, 38, 939.
5. Bruns, R. F.; Fergus, J. H.; Coughenour, L. L.; Courtland, G. G.; Pugsley, T. A.;
Dodd, J. H.; Tinney, F. J. Mol. Pharmacol. 1990, 38, 950.
6. Aurelio, L.; Flynn, B. L.; Scammells, P. J. Aust. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 402.
7. Van der Klein, P. A. M.; Kourounakis, A. P.; Ijzerman, A. P. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42,
3629.
8. Baraldi, P. G.; Pavani, M. G.; Leung, E.; Moorman, A. R.; Varani, K.; Vincenzi, F.;
Boreac, P. A.; Romagnoli, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 16, 1402.
9. Tranberg, C. E.; Zickgraf, A.; Giunta, B. N.; Luetjens, H.; Figler, H.; Murphree, L.
J.; Falke, R.; Fleischer, H.; Linden, J.; Scammells, P. J.; Olsson, R. A. J. Med. Chem.
2002, 45, 382.
10. Baraldi, P. G.; Zaid, A. N.; Lampronti, I.; Fruttarolo, F.; Pavani, M. G.; Tabrizi, M.
A.; Shryock, J. C.; Leung, E.; Romagnolia, R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10,
1953.
11. Aurelio, L.; Valant, C.; Flynn, B. L.; Sexton, P. M.; Christopoulos, A.; Scammells,
P. J. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 4543.
12. Aurelio, L.; Valant, C.; Figler, H.; Flynn, B. L.; Linden, J.; Sexton, P. M.;
Christopoulos, A.; Scammells, P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 7353.
13. Gewald, K.; Schinke, E.; Bottcher, H. Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 94.
14. Nikolakopoulos, G.; Figler, H.; Linden, J.; Scammells, P. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2006, 14, 2358.
15. Tormyshev, V. M.; Trukhin, D. V.; Rogozhnikova, O. Y.; Mikhalina, T. V.;
Troitskaya, T. I.; Flinn, A. Synlett 2006, 2559.
16. Lehnert, W. Tetrahedron 1973, 29, 635.
appears as a weak allosteric agonist. To investigate this observa-
tion, we constructed complete R-PIA concentration–response
curves in the absence or presence of increasing concentrations of
two of the compounds. We chose 12c as an allosteric enhancer
with strong agonism and 12h as an allosteric enhancer with weak
agonsim. Increasing concentrations of 12c promoted a leftward
shift of the orthosteric agonist concentration–response curve, with
concomitant strong (allosteric) agonist activity (Fig. 3A). In con-
trast, increasing concentrations of 12h more modestly potentiated
the R-PIA concentration–response curve, while exhibiting minimal
allosteric agonism (Fig. 3B). Application of an operational model of
allosterism17,18 to the data yielded pKB estimates of the affinity of
the compounds 12c and 12h for the allosteric site of 5.10 0.14
and 5.07 0.17, respectively, and estimates of the positive cooper-
ativity factors of the interactions with log
ab = 0.98 0.13 (i.e.,
a
b = 10) and 0.46 0.07 (i.e., b = 3), respectively. It appears, there-
a
fore, that, neither the type of substituent on the 3-benzoyl group
nor the size of the cycloalkyl ring are the key points for engender-
ing affinity to the allosteric site, but rather influence the coopera-
tivity of these compounds exerted on R-PIA.
17. Aurelio, L.; Valant, C.; Flynn, B. L.; Sexton, P. M.; White, J. M.; Christopoulos, A.;
Scammells, P. J. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 6550.
18. Leach, K.; Sexton, P. M.; Christopoulos, A. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 382.
In conclusion, a novel series of 2-amino-4,5,6,7,8,9-hexahydro-
cycloocta[b]thiophenes were synthesised and evaluated as alloste-