1404
A. A. Kolender et al. / Carbohydrate Research 346 (2011) 1398–1405
1.41 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 3.17 (dd, 1H, J1b,2 6.0, J1a,1b 14.0 Hz, H-1b),
3.31 (dt, 1H, J5,6a–J5,6b 3.7, J4,5 6.2 Hz, H-5), 3.26–3.56 (m, 5H,
H-1a, H-2–H-5), 3.39, 3.45, 3.48, 3.51 (4s, 3H each, CH3O), 3.67
(dd, 1H, J5,6b 3.7, J6a,6b 12.1 Hz, H-6b), 3.85 (dd, 1H, J5,6a 3.6 Hz,
H-6a), 5.01 (br s, 1H, NH); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) d 28.3
(C(CH3)3), 40.5 (C-1), 57.1, 58.7 (CH3O), 59.5 (C-6), 60.3, 60.5
(CH3O), 79.0 (C-4), 79.2 (C(CH3)3), 79.7 (C-3), 81.0 (C-5), 81.5
(C-2), 156.0 (NCO2). ESI-HRMS: calcd for [C15H31NO7+Na]+:
360.1993. Found m/z: 360.2000.
CDCl3) d 28.4 ((CH3)3C), 40.7 (C-1), 57.8, 58.9, 60.4, 60.7 (CH3O),
66.4 (C-6), 71.9, 73.3, 79.8 (C-3–C-5), 79.3 ((CH3)3C), 81.5 (C-2),
121.0, 126.0, 129.5, 151.1 (C-aromatic), 153.7 (OCO2), 156.0
(NCO2). Anal. Calcd for C22H35NO9: C, 57.75; H, 7.71; N, 3.06.
Found: C, 57.49; H, 7.98; N, 3.50.
3.8. 1-Amino-1-deoxy-2,3,4,5-tetra-O-methyl-6-O-
phenyloxycarbonyl-D-sorbitol hydrochloride (12)
Compound 11 (0.264 g, 0.58 mmol) was dissolved in EtOAc sat-
urated with HCl (15 mL). The solution was stirred at rt for 20 h.
After concentration, the residue was washed with EtOAc
(3 ꢃ 4 mL) to give compound 12 (0.223 g, 98%); 1H NMR
(500 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 2.81 (m, 1H, H-1a), 3.04 (m, 1H, H-1b),
3.34, 3.38, 3.41, 3.43 (4s, 3H each, CH3O), 3.43 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.56
(dd, 1H, J3,4 3.1, J2,3 6.1 Hz, H-3), 3.59 (td, 1H, J5,6a 2.3, J4,5–J5,6b
5.7 Hz, H-5), 3.76 (ddd, 1H, J 2.9, J2,3 6.1, J 9.0 Hz, H-2), 4.19 (dd,
1H, J6a,6b 12.0 Hz, H-6b), 4.62 (dd, 1H, H-6a), 7.23–7.46 (m, 5H,
H-aromatic), 8.03 (br s, 3H, NH); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, DMSO-d6)
d 39.2 (C-1), 57.4, 58.6, 59.3, 59.4 (CH3O), 66.9 (C-6), 76.9 (C-2),
78.0 (C-4), 78.6 (C-5), 79.2 (C-3), 121.3, 126.3, 129.7, 150.8 (C-aro-
matic), 153.1 (OCO2). Anal. Calcd for C17H27NO7ꢄ1.5HCl: C, 49.55;
H, 6.97; N, 3.40. Found: C, 49.44; H, 7.34; N, 3.39.
3.6. General procedure for the polymerization of 5 via
isocyanate 7
To a solution of 5 (0.066 g, 0.28 mmol) in THF (0.4 mL) was
added DTBTC27 (0.090 g, 0.34 mmol). The mixture was stirred at
rt, under a static argon atmosphere, for 2 h. In the first occasion,
a small portion was concentrated at rt in order to verify the conver-
sion of 5 into 1-deoxy-1-isocyanate-2,3,4,5-tetra-O-methyl-D-sor-
bitol (7): IR (KBr, film): 3407 (br, OH) and 2263 cmꢀ1 (s, NCO).
To a solution of crude 7 in CHCl3 or THF was added a solution of
the corresponding catalyst [Zr(acac)4, Sn(oct)2 or Et3N] in the same
solvent. When the polymerization was conducted in the presence
of the initiator 6, a solution of the catalyst and the initiator was
prepared and, after 1 h of stirring at rt, the monomer was added.
The final concentrations of monomer and reagents are shown in
Table 1. The polymerization was conducted under Ar atmosphere
at 40 °C for 16 h, with vigorous stirring. Then, it was concentrated
and the residue was redissolved in 2-propanol (0.3 mL). The poly-
mer was isolated by precipitation with hexane (3 mL). This proce-
dure was repeated twice. The results of the polymerization are
summarized in Table 1.
3.9. General procedure for the polymerization of 12
To a solution of 12 (0.2 g, 0.5 mmol) in DMF or THF (0.25 mL)
was added DIPEA (1.5 mmol). The volume of the solution was ad-
justed with the solvent to give 1 M solution of 12. The mixture
was stirred at 40 °C under Ar atmosphere for 3 days. Then, the
upper phase was removed and the lower one was concentrated.
The residue was dissolved in 2-propanol (0.2 mL) and precipitated
with hexane (4 mL). Polyurethane 8 (0.123 g, 99%) isolated by this
procedure was contaminated with DIPEA hydrochloride (according
to the 1H NMR spectrum). Therefore, this material was dissolved in
H2O and passed through a column containing Dowex MR-3C mixed
bed resin. The polymer recovered after this procedure was free of
the ammonium salt (0.107 g, 81%). The results of the polymeriza-
tion are summarized in Table 2. DSC: No thermal transitions were
observed after heating, cooling, and second heating cycles. TG:
From rt to 450 °C, 90% mass loss; the differential curve showed
two minimum peaks at 165.1 and 281.2 °C.
Polyurethane 8: ½a D25
= ꢀ2 (c 1.2, H2O); IR (film): 3366 (br, NH),
ꢂ
1733, 1546 cmꢀ1 (s, NCOO); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 3.20 (m,
1H, H-1b), 3.41–3.60 (m, 5H, H-1a, H-2–H-5), 3.41, 3.48, 3.49,
3.53 (4s, 3H each, CH3O), 4.10 (d, 1H, J6a,6b 11.4 Hz, H-6b), 4.54
(d, 1H, H-6a), 5.41 (br s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, CDCl3) d
41.6 (C-1), 57.4, 59.1, 60.3, 60.6 (CH3O), 61.9 (C-6), 78.8, 78.9,
79.9, 81.0 (C-2–C-5), 156.5 (CO).
N,N0-Disubstituted urea 9: ½a 2D5
ꢂ
= +2 (c 1.7, CHCl3); 1H NMR
(500 MHz, C5D5N) d 3.49, 3.51, 3.59 (3s, 3H each, CH3O), 3.65 (m,
1H, H-1b), 3.67 (s, 3H, CH3O), 3.75 (ddd, 1H, J4,5 6.1, J5,6a 3.2, J5,6b
4.6 Hz, H-5), 3.84 (dd, 1H, J2,3 6.3, J3,4 3.9 Hz, H-3), 3.94 (td, J1a,2
–
J2,3 6.3, J1b,2 4.2 Hz, H-2), 4.04 (dd, 1H, H-4), 4.07 (dd, 1H, J6a,6b
12.0 Hz, H-6b), 4.08 (m, 1H, H-1a), 4.29 (dd, 1H, H-6a), 6.82 (t,
1H, J 5.8 Hz, NH); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz, C5D5N) d 46.6 (C-1), 57.9,
59.2, 60.5 (CH3O), 60.7 (C-6), 60.9 (CH3O), 80.7 (C-4), 82.2 (C-2),
82.7 (C-3), 83.2 (C-5), 160.2 (CO). ESI-HRMS: calcd for
[C21H44N2O11+H]+: 501.3018; [C21H44N2O11+Na]+: 523.2837. Found
m/z: 501.3030 and 523.2856, respectively.
Acknowledgments
Support of this work by the University of Buenos Aires (Project
X227), the National Research Council of Argentina (CONICET, Pro-
ject PIP 2008-0064) and the National Agency for Promotion of Sci-
ence and Technology (ANPCyT, PICT 2007-00291) is gratefully
acknowledged. O.V. and A.A.K. are Research Members from
CONICET.
3.7. 1-(N-tert-Butoxycarbonylamino)-1-deoxy-2,3,4,5-tetra-O-
methyl-6-O-phenyloxycarbonyl-D-sorbitol (11)
References
Crude compound 6, obtained from 5 as described above, was
employed for the next reaction without further purification. After
concentration of the reaction mixture of preparation of 6, the res-
idue was dissolved in dry pyridine (1.2 mL), and phenylchlorofor-
mate (0.070 mL, 0.56 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred
at rt for 24 h. After subsequent addition of MeOH and toluene,
the mixture was concentrated and purified by column chromatog-
raphy (4:1 toluene–EtOAc) to yield 12 (0.181 g, 72% from 5);
1. Van De Manakker, F.; Vermonden, T.; Van Nostrum, C. F.; Hennink, W. E.
Biomacromolecules 2009, 10, 3157–3175.
2. Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Macromol. Biosci. 2007, 7, 999–1009.
3. Okada, M. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2002, 27, 87–133.
4. Varela, O.; Orgueira, H. A. Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1999, 55, 137–174.
5. Galbis, J. A.; García-Martín, M. G. Top. Curr. Chem. 2010, 295, 147–176.
´
6. DwanIsa, J. P.; Mohanty, A. K.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L. T. Biobased Polyurethanes
and Their Composites: Present Status and Future Perspective In Mohanty, A. K.,
Misra, M., Drzal, L. T., Eds.; Natural Fibers, Biopolymers and Biocomposites; CRC
Press: Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, 2005; pp 775–805.
½
a 2D5 = +3 (c 5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) d 1.45 (s, 9H,
ꢂ
7. Garçon, R.; Clerk, C.; Gesson, J.-P.; Bordado, J.; Nunes, T.; Caroço, S.; Gomes, P.
T.; Minas da Piedade, M. E.; Rauter, A. P. Carbohydr. Polym. 2001, 45, 123–127.
8. Hashimoto, K.; Yaginuma, K.; Nara, S.-I.; Okawa, H. Polymer J. 2005, 37, 384–390.
9. Hashimoto, K.; Wibullcksanakul, S.; Okada, M. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem.
1995, 33, 1495–1503.
C(CH3)3), 3.21 (m, 1H, H-1b), 3.42 (m, 1H, H-2), 3.47, 3.49, 3.52,
3.55 (4s, 3H each, CH3O), 3.54–3.57 (m, 4H, H-1a, H-3–H-5), 4.30
(dd, 1H, J5,6a 4.5, J6a,6b 11.7 Hz, H-6b), 4.72 (d, 1H, H-6a), 4.97 (br
s, 1H, NH), 7.18–7.41 (m, 5H, H-aromatic); 13C NMR (125.7 MHz,