In contrast to the former two strategies, the third strategy
is more attractive, owing to the air and moisture stability
of the reagents, their availability, and their low toxicity.
However, the dependenceofthe product on the stereogenic
center and the protecting group at C-3 limits the appli-
cation of this method.7d,8 Hence, it is still necessary to
develop more flexible and efficient strategies.
diverse C-glycosides. Herein, we describe our results for
the preparation of the 2-deoxy-C-aryl glycosides via this
method.
Table 1. Optimization of the Decarboxylative Coupling
Reactiona
temp
time
(h)
yield
(%)b
entry
catalyst
ligand
none
(°C)
1
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
PdCl2
80
80
60
70
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
12
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
50
2
none
59
Figure 1. Biologically active natural products containing C-aryl
glycosides.
3
none
trace
<5
54
4
none
5
none
Currently, transition-metal-catalyzed decarboxylative
cross-coupling reactions offer efficient synthetic methods
for forming carbonÀcarbon bonds. They are attractive
since they use ubiquitous carboxylic acids as alternative
reagents to organometallic compounds.9À11 Pioneering
work by Myers9 and Goossen10 demonstrated that, in a
number of Heck-type reactions, ortho-substituted arene
carboxylic acids could be used as synthetic equivalents of
aryl halides in the presence of palladium catalysts and
stoichiometric amounts of silver or copper additives at
high temperatures. This type of reaction proceeded very
well with different kinds of olefins in air and even with
small amounts of water.9a Inspired by the successful im-
plementation of decarboxylative coupling and our group’s
continuing efforts at extending the synthetic methodolo-
gies of carbohydrates,12 we envisioned that this protocol
could be made to work effectively with glycals to give
6
Pd(TFA)2
Pd(PPh3)2Cl2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
none
<5
<10
79
7
none
8
PPh3
9
R-monophos
X-phos
S-phos
Xantphos
(2-MeOPh)3P
77
10
11
12
13
63
46
28
10
a Reaction conditions: 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal 0.2 mmol, 2,
6-dimethoxybenzoic acid 0.4 mmol (2.0 equiv), Ag2CO3 0.6 mmol
(3.0 equiv), catalyst 0.02 mmol (0.1 equiv), ligand 0.08 mmol (0.4 equiv),
DMF/DMSO = 2 mL/0.1 mL. b Isolated yields.
Our initial aim was to achieve coupling of commer-
cially available 3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-D-glucal (1a) with 2,
6-dimethoxybenzoic acid (2a). Treatment of 1a with 2a at
80 °C in the presence of Ag2CO3 and catalytic Pd(OAc)2 in
DMSO/DMF (1:20) for 12 h afforded the corresponding
C-glycoside product 3a as a single diastereomer in 50%
yield. Encouraged by this result, different reaction times,
temperatures, and a variety of palladium catalysts with
different ligands were screened to optimize the reaction
conditions. As shown in Table 1, when the reaction time
was reduced to 4 h (entry 2) at 80 °C, the reaction did not
complete, and 29% of the starting material was recovered.
However, the yield was improved to 59%, demonstrating
the product’s instability to high temperatures. Attempts to
reduce the temperature were unsuccessful as only trace
amounts of the coupling product at 60 °C and less than 5%
coupling product at 70 °C were isolated (entries 3, 4). Fur-
ther investigations were conducted on the catalysts, and
the results demonstrated that this reaction proceeded when
PdCl2 was employed instead of Pd(OAc)2, albeit in a
slightly lower yield (entry 5). On the other hand, other
palladium catalysts such as Pd(TFA)2 and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2
did not perform well in this reaction (entries 6, 7). Inter-
estingly, subsequent examination of the ligand effect re-
vealed their significant influence on this reaction. Based on
the results, it was observed that while some ligands aid
(8) Cheng, J. C. Y.; Daves, G. D., Jr. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 3083.
(9) (a) Myers, A. G.; Tanaka, D.; Mannion, M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 11250. (b) Tanaka, D.; Myers, A. G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 433.
(c) Tanaka, D.; Romeril, S. P.; Myers, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 10323.
(10) (a) Goossen, L. J.; Deng, G.; Levy, L. M. Science 2006, 313, 662.
(b) Goossen, L. J.; Rodrı
L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4824. (c) Goossen, L. J.; Rudolphi,
F.; Oppel, C.; Rodrıguez, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3043.
´
guez, N.; Melzer, B.; Linder, C.; Deng, J.; Levy,
´
(11) For other recent examples, see: (a) Forgione, P.; Brochu, M. C.;
Miguel, S. O.; Thesen, K. H.; Bailey, M. D.; Bilodeau, F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 11350. (b) Becht, J. M.; Catala, C.; Drian, C. L.; Wagner,
A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1781. (c) Wang, C.-Y.; Piel, I.; Glorius, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4194. (d) Shang, R.; Fu, Y.; Li, J.-B.; Zhang, S.-L.;
Guo, Q.-X.; Liu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5738. (e) Hu, P.; Kan,
J.; Su, W.-P.; Hong, M.-C. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2341. (f) Lindh, J.;
€
Sjoberg, P. J. R.; Larhed, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7733.
(g) Wang, C.-Y.; Rakshit, S.; Glorius, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
14006. (h) Shang, R.; Yang, Z.-W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.-L.; Liu, L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14391.
(12) (a) Lorpitthaya, R.; Xie, Z.-Z.; Kuo, J.-L.; Liu, X.-W. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1561. (b) Sudibya, H. G.; Ma, J.-M.; Dong, X.; Ng, S.;
Li, L.-J.; Liu, X.-W.; Chen, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2723.
(c) Zeng, J.; Vedachalam, S.; Xiang, S.-H.; Liu, X.-W. Org. Lett. 2011,
13, 42. (d) Ding, F.-Q.; William, R.; Wang, F.; Ma, J.-M.; Ji, L.; Liu
X.-W. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 652. (e) Gorityala, B. K.; Ma, J.-M.;
Pasunooti, K. K.; Cai, S.-T.; Liu, X.-W. Green Chem. 2011, 13, 573.
(f) Ding, F.-Q.; William, R.; Wang, S.-M.; Gorityala, B. K.; Liu, X.-W.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3929.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 17, 2011
4609