Please do not adjust margins
Dalton Transactions
Page 5 of 7
DOI: 10.1039/C5DT02405F
Journal Name
ARTICLE
Synthesis of 3-NO2
Acknowledgements
General synthetic scheme followed. 94% Yield (41 mg,
3
ASV thanks the donors of the Petroleum Research Fund
(51715-ND3) for financial support to initiate this project. The
completion of this work was supported by the US Department
of Energy, Materials Sciences Division, under Award No. DE-
0.037 mmol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.59 (d, JHH = 8.5
3
Hz, 2H, C4-H), 8.11 (d, JHH = 8.5 Hz, 2H, C5-H), 7.47 (m, 18H,
aromatic), 7.30 (m, 12H, aromatic). 13C NMR Shifts (indirect
detection through H-13C gHMBC and H-13C gHSQC (500 MHz,
CDCl3)): δ 149.7 (C2), 145.3 (C6), 143.5 (C3), 134.2 (C7, C8,
C11, C12), 131.7 (C10), 131.6 (C14), 129.1 (C9, C13), 125.9
(C4), 123.7 (C5) (Note: C1 is not observed). 31P{1H} NMR (121.4
MHz, CDCl3): δ 44.39 (s, P1). 32.08 (s, P2). Anal. Calcd for
C44H34Au2P2N4O2: C, 47.75; H, 3.10; N, 5.06. Found: C, 47.91;
H, 3.26; N, 5.16.
1
1
SC0010510. KAA thanks UF and the NSF CHE-0821346 for
funding the purchase of X-ray equipment.
References
1
2
3
4
5
6
T. J. Del Castillo, S. Sarkar, K. A. Abboud and A. S. Veige,
Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 8140-8144.
Synthesis of 3-F
General synthetic scheme followed. 89% Yield (38 mg, 0.035
mmol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.34 (dd, 3JHH = 8.6 Hz, 4JHF
=6.1 Hz 2H, C4-H), 7.45 (m, 18H, aromatic), 7.30 (m, 12H,
aromatic), 6.95 (dd, JHF = 8.6 Hz, JHH = 8.6 Hz, 2H, C5-H). 13C
NMR Shifts (indirect detection through H-13C gHMBC and H-
13C gHSQC (500 MHz, CDCl3)): δ 161.4 (C6), 150.6 (C2), 132.9
(C3), 132.4 (C7, C8, C11, C12), 131.6 (C10, C14), 129.1 (C9,
C13), 127.8 (C4), 114.5 (C5), (Note: C1 is not observed). 31P{1H}
NMR (121.4 MHz, CDCl3): δ 44.50 (s, P1), 31.77 (s, P2). 19F{1H}
NMR (282.2 MHz, CDCl3): δ -118.8 (s, F Anal. Calcd for
C44H34Au2P2N3F: C, 48.79; H, 2.97; N, 3.80. Found: C, 48.95; H,
3.17; N, 3.89.
H. C. Kolb, M. G. Finn and K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed., 2001, 40, 2004-2021.
C. W. Tornøe, C. Christensen and M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem.,
2002, 67, 3057-3064.
3
3
1
1
V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 2596-2599.
E. Evangelio, N. P. Rath and L. M. Mirica, Dalton Trans., 2012,
41, 8010-8021.
L. Henry, C. Schneider, B. Mutzel, P. V. Simpson, C. Nagel, K.
Fucke and U. Schatzschneider, Chem. Commun., 2014,
15692-15695.
7
L. Casarrubios, M. C. de la Torre and M. A. Sierra, Chem. Eur.
J., 2013, 19, 3534-3541.
Synthesis of 3-OMe
General synthetic scheme followed. 90% Yield (39 mg,
3
8
9
H. W. Fruhauf, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 523-596.
H. W. Fruhauf, Coord. Chem. Rev., 2002, 230, 79-96.
0.036 mmol). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.32 (d, JHH = 8.2
Hz, 2H, C4-H), 7.46 (m, 18H, aromatic), 7.30 (m, 12H,
3
aromatic), 6.84 (d, JHH = 8.2 Hz, 2H, C5-H), 3.81 (s, 3H, OCH3).
13C NMR Shifts (indirect detection through H-13C gHMBC and
1H-13C gHSQC (500 MHz, CDCl3)): δ 157.8 (C6), 151.2 (C2),
134.2 (C7, C8, C11, C12), 131.6 (C10, C14), 129.6 (C3), 129.1
(C9, C13), 127.6 (C4), 113.4 (C5), 55.3 (OCH3), (Note: C1 is not
observed). 31P{1H} NMR (121.4 MHz, CDCl3): δ 44.58 (s, P1),
31.81 (s, P2). Anal. Calcd for C45H37Au2P2N3O: C, 49.51; H,
3.42; N, 3.85. Found: C, 49.79; H, 3.25; N, 3.65.
10 D. V. Partyka, J. B. Updegraff, M. Zeller, A. D. Hunter and T.
G. Gray, Organometallics, 2007, 26, 183-186.
1
11 S. D. Koster, H. Alborzinia, S. Z. Can, I. Kitanovic, S. Wolfl, R.
Rubbiani, I. Ott, P. Riesterer, A. Prokop, K. Merz and N.
Metzler-Nolte, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, 2062-2072.
12 M. C. Clough, P. D. Zeits, N. Bhuvanesh and J. A. Gladysz,
Organometallics, 2012, 31, 5231-5234.
13 K. S. Singh, V. Svitlyk and Y. Mozharivskyj, Dalton Trans.,
2011, 40, 1020-1023.
General Guidelines for Kinetic Experiments
14 Y. H. Zhou, T. Lecourt and L. Micouin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
2010, 49, 2607-2610.
All kinetic experiments were run using CDCl3 stock
solutions spiked with hexamethyldisiloxane (HMDSO) as an
internal standard (0.005 M) against which the product
integrations could be referenced. For each set of experiments,
a fresh stock solution of azide and acetylide was created. In
order minimize the time a sample was mixed before spectra
15 F. C. Liu, Y. L. Lin, P. S. Yang, G. H. Lee and S. M. Peng,
Organometallics, 2010, 29, 4282-4290.
16 D. V. Partyka, L. Gao, T. S. Teets, J. B. Updegraff, N. Deligonul
and T. G. Gray, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 6171-6182.
17 C. K. Chen, H. C. Tong, C. Y. C. Hsu, C. Y. Lee, Y. H. Fong, Y. S.
Chuang, Y. H. Lo, Y. C. Lin and Y. Wang, Organometallics,
2009, 28, 3358-3368.
began to be collected,
a NMR tube charged with a
premeasured volume of Au(I)-acetylide stock solution was
brought to the NMR instrument, and the azide stock solution
added to the tube directly prior to loading the sample into the
18 C. W. Chang and G. H. Lee, Organometallics, 2003, 22, 3107-
3116.
magnet.
A lock was already established on the NMR
19 S. A. Knott, J. N. Templeton, J. L. Durham, A. M. Howard, R.
McDonald and L. F. Szczepura, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 8132-
8139.
instrument with a similar sample, but to ensure accurate
integrations, a new lock and shims were established for each
sample. Two steady state scans were executed in order to
stabilize the magnetization prior to collection of each
spectrum. If a third stock solution needed to be added to the
tube (triphenylphosphine), it was mixed with the azide
solution directly prior to mixing the azide with the acetylide.
20 T. J. Robilotto, D. S. Alt, H. A. von Recum and T. G. Gray,
Dalton Trans., 2011, 40, 8083-8085.
21 T. Cruchter, K. Harms and E. Meggers, Chem. Eur. J., 2013,
19, 16682-16689.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 5
Please do not adjust margins