A. Palumbo Piccionello et al.
SHORT COMMUNICATION
tion constant of 4 with the Hg2+ ion (calculated to be
4.07Ϯ0.05ϫ104 –1) is in agreement with the value found
from non-linear fitting (see Supporting Information).
gram. Financial support through the University of Palermo is
gratefully acknowledged.
[1] a) A. W. Czarnik, in Fluorescent Chemosensors for Ion and Mo-
lecule Recognition, American Chemical Society, Washington,
DC, 1993; b) A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugs-
son, A. J. M. Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher, T. E.
Rice, Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1515–1566; c) B. Valeur, I. Leray,
Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 3–40; d) R. Martínez-Máñez, F.
Sancenón, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419–4476; e) J. F. Callan,
A. P. de Silva, D. C. Magri, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 8551–8588;
f) L. Basabe-Desmonts, D. N. Reinhoudt, M. Crego-Calama,
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 993–1017.
Conclusions
A new tren-based sensor with good selectivity toward
Hg2+ has been designed and synthesized in few steps and
high yields. The sensing mechanism of this new fluorogenic
chemosensor, containing for the first time an 1,2,4-oxadia-
zole as luminophore, is based on the inhibition of a photo-
induced electron transfer from tren to oxadiazole, after co-
ordination of the metal ion with a 1:1 stoichiometry. The
activity of this sensor has been investigated also in mixed
aqueous/organic solvents. Moreover, the coordinating abi-
lity of the tripodal nitrogen atoms in the tren seems not to
be affected by the link with the electron-withdrawing fluo-
roaryl moiety. This opens the way to the development of
new sensors based on the easily obtainable fluoroarylated
tren core.
[2] D. W. Boening, Chemosphere 2000, 40, 1335–1351.
[3] For a recent review in the field, see: E. M. Nolan, S. J. Lippard,
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3443–3480.
[4] For example, see: a) A. Ono, H. Togashi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 4300–4302; b) S.-Y. Moon, N. J. Youn, S. M. Park, S.-
K. Chang, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2394–2397; c) M.-H. Ha-
Thi, M. Penhoat, V. Michelet, I. Leray, Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
1133–1136; d) L. Praveen, V. B. Ganga, R. Thirumalai, T.
Sreeja, M. L. P. Reddy, R. L. Varma, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46,
6277–6282; e) N. Wanichacheva, M. Siriprumpoonthum, A.
Kamkaew, K. Grudpan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1783–
1786; f) Y. Wan, W. Niu, W. J. Behof, Y. Wang, P. Boyle, C. B.
Gorman, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 4293–4297.
[5] For example, see: a) R. R. Avirah, K. Jyothish, D. Ramaiah,
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 121–124; b) S. Yoon, E. W. Miller, Q. He,
P. H. Do, C. J. Chang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6658–
6661; c) Y. Shiraishi, H. Maehara, K. Ishizumi, T. Hirai, Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 3125–3128; d) Y. Shiraishi, S. Sumiya, Y. Kohno,
T. Hirai, J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8571–8574; e) X. Chen, S.-W.
Nam, M. J. Jou, Y. Kim, S.-J. Kim, S. Park, J. Yoon, Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 5235–5238; f) V. Bhalla, R. Tejpal, M. Kumar, R.
Kumar Puri, R. K. Mahajan, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2649–
2652; g) J. Fan, K. Guo, X. Peng, J. Du, J. Wang, S. Sun, H.
Li, Sens. Actuators B 2009, 142, 191–196.
[6] a) A. G. Blackman, Polyhedron 2005, 24, 1–39; b) L. Fabbrizzi,
G. Francese, M. Licchelli, A. Perotti, A. Taglietti, Chem. Com-
mun. 1997, 581–582; c) H. Xie, S. Yi, X. Yang, S. Wu, New J.
Chem. 1999, 23, 1105–1110; d) S. L. Tobey, E. V. Anslyn, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 14807–14815; e) A. B. Othman,
J. W. Lee, Y.-D. Huh, R. Abidi, J. S. Kim, J. Vicens, Tetrahedron
2007, 63, 10793–10800.
[7] a) J. Yoon, N. E. Ohler, D. H. Vance, W. D. Aumiller, A. W.
Czarnik, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3845–3848; b) Q. Y. Chen,
C. F. Chen, Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 165–168; c) A. B. Oth-
man, J. W. Lee, J.-S. Wu, J. S. Kim, R. Abidi, P. Thuéry, J. M.
Strub, A. V. Dorsselaer, J. Vicens, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7634–
7640; d) M. H. Lee, J. S. Wu, J. W. Lee, J. H. Jung, J. S. Kim,
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2501–2504; e) M. H. Lee, S. J. Lee, J. H.
Jung, H. Lima, J. S. Kim, Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 12087–12092.
[8] S. Buscemi, A. Pace, A. Palumbo Piccionello, N. Vivona, J. Flu-
orine Chem. 2006, 127, 1601–1605.
Experimental Section
Synthesis of Compound 4: To a stirred solution of tris(2-amino-
ethyl)amine (44.8 µL, 0.3 mmol) in dry DMF (3 mL), K2CO3
(0.138 g, 1 mmol) and compound 3 (0.277 g, 0.9 mmol) were
added, and the suspension was maintained at room temperature
under efficient stirring for 2 h. The reaction mixture was then di-
luted with water (50 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (200 mL). The
organic phase was dried with Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated
in vacuo. The obtained residue was chromatographed to give unre-
acted 3 (28 mg, 10%), compound 4 (233 mg, 77%) and compound
5 (15 mg, 5%).
1
Compound 4: M.p. 161–163 °C (EtOH). H NMR (300 MHz, [D3]-
acetonitrile): δ = 1.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3 H, CH2CH3), 2.84 (t, J =
6.0 Hz, 2 H, NCH2), 3.57–3.63 (m, 2 H, NHCH2), 4.46 (q, J =
7.2 Hz, 2 H, OCH2) 5.46 (br. s, 1 H, exchangable with D2O) ppm.
13C NMR (1H-decoupled, 75 MHz, [D3]acetonitrile, ): δ = 14.2,
43.1, 54.1, 63.8, 133.9, 134.9 (d, JC,F = 128.5 Hz), 146.8 (d, JC,F
=
261.8 Hz), 158.3, 163.0, 170.7 ppm. 19F NMR (283 MHz, [D3]-
acetonitrile): δ = –140.4, –162.7 ppm. UV (CH3CN) λmax = 313 nm
(ε = 79100 –1 cm–1). FT-IR (Nujol): ν = 3379, 1751, 1734,
˜
1655 cm–1. GC–MS: m/z (%) = 1010 (100) [M+]. C39H30F12N10O9
(1010.70): calcd. C 46.35, H 2.99, N 13.86; found C 46.40, H 2.90,
N 13.90.
[9] For a recent review on 1,2,4-oxadiazole reactivity and applica-
tions, see: A. Pace, P. Pierro, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 4337–
4348.
[10] See, for example: a) S. Buscemi, A. Pace, V. Frenna, N. Vivona,
Heterocycles 2002, 57, 811–823; b) S. Buscemi, A. Pace, A. Pal-
umbo Piccionello, I. Pibiri, N. Vivona, G. Giorgi, A. Mazzanti,
D. Spinelli, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 8106–8113.
[11] a) S. Buscemi, A. Pace, A. Palumbo Piccionello, I. Pibiri, N.
Vivona, Heterocycles 2004, 63, 1619; b) A. Pace, I. Pibiri, S.
Buscemi, N. Vivona, L. Malpezzi, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
4108–4115; c) S. Buscemi, A. Pace, I. Pibiri, N. Vivona, T. Ca-
ronna, J. Fluorine Chem. 2004, 125, 165–173.
[12] a) S. Buscemi, A. Pace, R. Calabrese, N. Vivona, P. Metrang-
olo, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 5865–5871; b) S. Buscemi, A. Pace,
A. Palumbo Piccionello, I. Pibiri, N. Vivona, Heterocycles
2004, 63, 1619–1628; c) A. Palumbo Piccionello, A. Pace, I.
Spectroscopic Material and Methods: Stock solutions (0.01 ) of
the metal perchlorate salts were prepared in CH3CN or H2O/
CH3CN. Stock solutions of 4 and 6 were prepared in CH3CN or
H2O/CH3CN. For all fluorescent tests, the excitation wavelength
was 313 nm with excitation and emission slit widths of 3 nm.
Supporting Information (see footnote on the first page of this arti-
cle): Experimental procedures, NMR spectra of compounds 3–6,
and additional spectra and titration data.
Acknowledgments
Prof. Y. Kuroda, Kyoto Institute of Technology, is deeply acknowl-
edged for useful discussions and for the use of the SPANA pro-
4552
www.eurjoc.org
© 2010 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 4549–4553